Last world tour spot to be decided between Saxo and Shimano?

Page 3 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Mar 31, 2010
18,136
5
0
Pentacycle said:
Greipel has won exactly 6 WT stages, half of which he won Down Under.(the other half are Tour stages ofc) The rest of his victories are just small races just like Kittel's. How impressive is that. :rolleyes:

3 tour stages against top competion >>>>>>> anything kittel or anyone at argos has ever done
 
theyoungest said:
Saxo were better on paper this season as well. However, in the actual races they simply sucked. And to solve that problem they signed some riders who are great on paper, but also sucked (Breschel, Bennati, Kreuziger). For next year I'd definitely expect more in the classics from Degenkolb than Breschel/Bennati.

That leaves a choice between one of the best stage racing teams (built around Contador) vs. one of the best sprinting teams (built around Kittel/Degenkolb). It's a cr.pshoot.

Well to help in this difficult decision: you have on one side the generations greatest stage racer vs. a team with 2 2nd tier (but promising) young sprinters. You have a team that can be a factor in the overall in WT stage races, week long and the grand tours and you have a team that can win a few stages here and there if they're lucky.

If the decision was based solely on performance in WT events it's not hard to decide who should get the call.
 
Mar 17, 2012
1,069
0
0
"From a sportive perspective" (Thanks, Matty Lloyd), I´d prefer Saxo, who´ve a great roster for 2013. Yet, would be glad to see Riis and Tinkov go down to 2nd division.

Normally, Saxo should get the spot. Argos get their wildcards anyways, Tour and Vuelta guaranteed, and their lineup is so much weaker than Saxo´s.

Though, I could imagine UCI wants to punish mainly Tinkov for his sharp critizism towards McQuaid and Verbruggen.
 
RHRH19861986 said:
"From a sportive perspective" (Thanks, Matty Lloyd), I´d prefer Saxo, who´ve a great roster for 2013. Yet, would be glad to see Riis and Tinkov go down to 2nd division.

Normally, Saxo should get the spot. Argos get their wildcards anyways, Tour and Vuelta guaranteed, and their lineup is so much weaker than Saxo´s.

Though, I could imagine UCI wants to punish mainly Tinkov for his sharp critizism towards McQuaid and Verbruggen.

What did Tinkov say?
 
Funny that even in the TDU there's only two Kittel stages next year.

Although his autobus antics from California could really add something to a Dauphine or Suisse.

If only Degenkolb could do 150 days :D

If I wanted to be talking up Argos' squad I'd be looking more at RJvR, Mezgec, Veelers, Dumoulin. These are the guys with potential to add something in WT races behind their two leaders.
 
theyoungest said:
And to solve that problem they signed some riders who are great on paper, but also sucked (Breschel, Bennati, Kreuziger). For next year I'd definitely expect more in the classics from Degenkolb than Breschel/Bennati.

That leaves a choice between one of the best stage racing teams (built around Contador) vs. one of the best sprinting teams (built around Kittel/Degenkolb). It's a cr.pshoot.
Don't worry all those riders will perform well next year. Bennati i think could win SB, Kreuziger could go well at the Ardennes and Breschel could top 5 in one of RVV/ P-R.

I want Saxo to get the spot.
 
Oct 19, 2010
206
0
0
cineteq said:
At what time does this will be announced?

According to a friend who has good contacts with UCI, the final list will be published this week without any surprise regarding teams.