The Tour is going about 2 weeks before any worthwhile stages. Actually that's a bit unfair. Mur-de-Brétagne could be good.
How disappointing that we have to wait for about stage 12 for the first proper mountain stage. That's way later than usual. Also, the flat stages are a tightly-controlled nonsense.
I know what Bavarianrider means about the back-loading of mountain stages. For example in the 2008 Giro the first 'true' mountain stage was stage 14, though we'd already had a couple of very tough intermediate stages (eg stage 7 to Pescocostanzo and stage 11 to Cesena) and some uphill finishes similar to the early Tour stages (stage 1 to Agrigento, stage 5 to Contursi Terme). The Luz Ardiden stage looks similar to the Pampeago stage of the '08 Giro - the Tour stage has an extra climb, but Manghen and Pampeago are tougher than Tourmalet + Luz Ardiden. The Pau-Lourdes stage is a bit of a nothing.
Then I assume that the Plateau de Beille stage:
is a direct comparison to the Passo Fedaia stage:
But obviously the climbs aren't as steep or punishing, though the stage is longer.
From here on in my comparison starts to fall apart. The next Tour mountain stage, to Pinerolo, more resembles a Vuelta stage to Peña Cabarga than a Giro stage, though maybe the similar finish in stage 10 of the 2009 edition matches. Certainly it doesn't match up to its direct comparison in 2008, the Kronplatz ITT. However it doesn't look too dissimilar to the Gavia-Mortirolo-Aprica stage that finished in Tirano - but Sestrières is never going to compete with the Gavia or Mortirolo. Monte Pora is nothing like as hard as the Galibier, but the Galibier finish in the Tour looks mighty... well... very gradual. It had better produce better racing than the depressingly bad Arcalis, that's all I can say.