- Apr 13, 2025
- 3,797
- 4,107
- 10,680
Costiou would like a word.
Teuns, Decomble and Larsen should be good, too. Maybe even Kubiš.
Costiou could be, but stage 3 and the time trial with those percentages rule out the rest.
Costiou would like a word.
Teuns, Decomble and Larsen should be good, too. Maybe even Kubiš.
It rules out Teuns (3rd in this exact time trial last year) and Decomble (5th last year) but not Lapeira who has done one single not sucky TT in his life (27th in Itzulia)?Costiou could be, but stage 3 and the time trial with those percentages rule out the rest.
OK.It rules out Teuns (3rd in this exact time trial last year) and Decomble (5th last year) but not Lapeira who has done one single not sucky TT in his life (27th in Itzulia)?
Proof that there is still a place in the peloton for Flanders-Baloise, however uncertain their future is.Crabbe!
Underrated kid, already insanely impressive in the 6 days of Ghent this winter. He wont be at Flanders for long.
Although tbf Crabbe had already shown enough at the end of last season to make me think he was ready for a bigger team.
I think Crabbe was already good enough to do sprints for a bigger team. Didn't necessarily have to be one of the Belgian ones - the first one that came to mind for me is Q36, who I think could really have done with a rider of his profile.But this mindset is exactly why that team is in trouble imo. The team should be for development of Flemish talent, but they should still be good enough to keep riders as long as they wouldn't be a leader in a WT team. If Crabbe left (without merger between the 2 other struggling Belgian teams he would've probably) he would've been put in a domestique role first, I don't think that's always good. Let him be a leader for 2 or 3 years, at Flanders before going over.
