Consider.What does conwidker mean?
24 consecutive finished stage races with a stage win or overall win doesn't scream ordinary to me.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Consider.What does conwidker mean?
24 consecutive finished stage races with a stage win or overall win doesn't scream ordinary to me.
Definitely not my take: he was in the chasing group of 4 trying to at least staunch the deficit going out further, and then droppped all of his group-mates on the RAF. Strong ride.I have no disrespect for Bardet but his second place is a bit like VdP's third place, i.e. a roll of the dice based on the tactics & movement of others. Carapaz wasted a load of energy chasing Pog & then the others wasted time looking at each other after la Côte de la Roche-aux-Faucons, i.e. which allowed Bardet to build his definitive gap.
It's why IMO it's impossible to extrapolate his performance here into something in the Giro or Tour.
There was basically Pog... & then the rest.
Should be block headwind early on la Redoute and the tailwind at the end of it.
Daaamn they got Red Rick? It’s a dog eat dog worldFell asleep with this being the last post I saw. Wake up and see that Red Rick's been banned. Easy win for Pog it was then.
Bardet was among the ~5 strongest in the race and made the right moves. Van der Poel was among the ~50 strongest in the race and made no moves. So to compare them is quite the stretch.I have no disrespect for Bardet but his second place is a bit like VdP's third place, i.e. a roll of the dice based on the tactics & movement of others. Carapaz wasted a load of energy chasing Pog & then the others wasted time looking at each other after la Côte de la Roche-aux-Faucons, i.e. which allowed Bardet to build his definitive gap.
It's why IMO it's impossible to extrapolate his performance here into something in the Giro or Tour.
There was basically Pog... & then the rest.
If there's a big 5 it's not roglic that drops out it's WvA, his palmares sucks compared to the others and for his talent.For me there are big 5. Roglic is a great rider with a nig palmares, but he has no get any performwnce againt the other 5 at his best where I say: OMG. The big 5 are young talented riders with an special way to race. Roglic is not different of the previous generation...he IS good at stage races, but he has lost Tour againt Pogacar, and this one againts Vingegard...he was close to lose the Giro againts Thomas...you cant conwidker so special...he won Líeja that way, Allaphillipe fail...He woule have been the best in another era, but for me we have big 5.
For me is not a question of palmares. Wout is almost as good as Van der Poel at ciclocroos Pavé and sprint, but he can win at Mont Ventoux, he is better than VDP for the rest of cycling, clearly, not by a little, in the mountains..so for me is better cyclist than MVDP. I remember Rigo saying he is the best cyclist of the world...I am not agree, but I understand his arguments. Wout in fact is the best example of this new supergenerationIf there's a big 5 it's not roglic that drops out it's WvA, his palmares sucks compared to the others and for his talent.
While I agree WVA is a monster talent, I'm not sure there is any meaningful measure beyond palmares, the whole point of racing bikes is to win.For me is not a question of palmares. Wout is almost as good as Van der Poel at ciclocroos Pavé and sprint, but he can win at Mont Ventoux, he is better than VDP for the rest of cycling, clearly, not by a little, in the mountains..so for me is better cyclist than MVDP. I remember Rigo saying he is the best cyclist of the world...I am not agree, but I understand his arguments. Wout in fact is the best example of this new supergeneration
I would have disagreed even as recently as a year ago, but I'm starting to come around to this viewpoint. If you don't win races that you should, by definition you're not realizing your potential. By the same token there are lesser riders who win more often than they should because they are tactically quite good. I'm thinking of Carapaz, although recently he hasn't shown much.While I agree WVA is a monster talent, I'm not sure there is any meaningful measure beyond palmares, the whole point of racing bikes is to win.
I am still hopeful Wout's palmares will grow to better reflect his talent, but it is genuinely hard when others have that little edge at different races. Depending which monument he starts he has to beat pog or remco in their favorite territory or mvdp at his.
Bardet, at 34, ending second (his best result ever in a monument) and VDP (plus 10 kg) third (after never have been in the race) proves Pogacar didn't have strong opposition. So, I'm convinced Evenepoel could have gone with Pogacar on la Redoute. But I agree that Pogacar probably would have won outsprinting Evenepoel at the finish.Pogačar doing what everyone expected of him, a solo from La Redoute while putting lots of time into his rivals and frankly I don't think anyone would have beaten him today, even Remco.
Bardet with a great second place, I wasn't expecting this from him at this point of his career but he showed that he still has it and sharing a monument podium with 6 time winners, Pogačar and Van der Poel has to be one of the highest points of his career.
Van der Poel did a really clever race, apart from the fact that he got caught up on that crash but he managed to use his endurance and sprint to finish ahead of many riders that climbed better than him. I still don't think that he can beat Pogačar or peak shape Remco here but if he peaks for this and Pogačar skips the race, who knows.
Honourable mention to Carapaz that is showing quite good legs while coming back from injury and even though he couldn't follow Pogačar at least he tried. Bernal attack up Roche Aux Faucons was also quite nice to see even though he didn't had much left in the tank.
Tacitcally astute riders' acumen is no longer able to overcome the difference in physical ability between the lesser riders and Pog, Remco and MVDP - the power hammer goes down and everyone else is done.I would have disagreed even as recently as a year ago, but I'm starting to come around to this viewpoint. If you don't win races that you should, by definition you're not realizing your potential. By the same token there are lesser riders who win more often than they should because they are tactically quite good. I'm thinking of Carapaz, although recently he hasn't shown much.
While I agree with this to some extent I think its not necessarily a done dealTacitcally astute riders' acumen is no longer able to overcome the difference in physical ability between the lesser riders and Pog, Remco and MVDP - the power hammer goes down and everyone else is done.
Yeah, he's almost as good as Van Der Poel in cross, but it is 6-3 in WC titles and 160-80 in wins. He's also almost good at cobbles as Van Der Poel, yet it is 5-0 in cobbled monuments, and 7-1 in biggest races.For me is not a question of palmares. Wout is almost as good as Van der Poel at ciclocroos Pavé and sprint, but he can win at Mont Ventoux, he is better than VDP for the rest of cycling, clearly, not by a little, in the mountains..so for me is better cyclist than MVDP. I remember Rigo saying he is the best cyclist of the world...I am not agree, but I understand his arguments. Wout in fact is the best example of this new supergeneration
He actually did. He broke away from the group after RaF bringing couple of guys with him and bridged to that group behind Bardet. That move gave him the podium place.Rick hinted he asked for the ban himself in the other forum.
Bardet was among the ~5 strongest in the race and made the right moves. Van der Poel was among the ~50 strongest in the race and made no moves. So to compare them is quite the stretch.
He was otherworldy among otherworlders that day.Impressive win. But not completely unpreceeded. 1998 Bartoli was kind of equally impressive, for instance.
Remco was equally impressive last two years. Let's not pretend we haven't seen it recently.Impressive win. But not completely unpreceeded. 1998 Bartoli was kind of equally impressive, for instance.
It doesn’t help when only 1 of the dominant riders is present. I think, because of these rider personalities and style, we won’t get as much of the situation where huge favorites are looking at each other and allowing other racers to take advantage (e.g. Carapaz’s Giro win) But it’s still possible if only the top guys suited to a race would all show up at those races.While I agree with this to some extent I think its not necessarily a done deal
Where Pog, Remco MDVP have the advantage is the power they yield in making the gap but maintaining the gap could be put at their rivals feet to some extent.
heads go down, riders give up , no one wants to bring the good sprinter to the line for 2nd and while no rider is unbeatable there is alot of riding in the peloton that makes them seems so
If there was an organised chase with 6 to 8 strong riders of course they could bring Pog and Remco back ...the difference in riding strength is not a big as perceived
The current racing has alot to do with the rest of the peloton that cannot get some better tactics together to bring back a rider after their big attack
They try to match the attack and blow (carapaz) , their team are not strong enough so they dont organise with others, They dont try other things
Everyone knew where Pog was going to attack yesterday so why not shoot some strong riders up the road early on
I put it to you that the strong guys seem invincible because the others have no plan , cohesion or tactics ...no one is unbeatable unless you think so
on top of which, why are we comparing MVDP and Bardet? Bardet is not going to win a la MVDP and MVDP is not going to win a la Bardet. We are better off comparing MVDP and Pidcock. Piddles claims to have had the best legs of his life, but he got impatient and tried to bridge to the front group. That cost him any chance of victory regardless of whether Bahrain and co got to draft the convoy. MVDP was nothing if not patient (for two straight races), and he got the maximum result he could. A podium in Liege can make a lesser rider's entire career! Like Mathieu kept saying in interviews, you have to gamble. Piddles was perhaps a bit too desperate to win; MVDP is becoming wiser; this is a positive takeaway for MVDP fans.He actually did. He broke away from the group after RaF bringing couple of guys with him and bridged to that group behind Bardet. That move gave him the podium place.
haha what? Pog having the strength of 8 (elite) men is not a big enough difference for you?If there was an organised chase with 6 to 8 strong riders of course they could bring Pog and Remco back ...the difference in riding strength is not a big as perceived
A 274 km race with 2800m of crappy-road climbing doesn't usually have 6-8 guys strong enough to chase. That's my point about Tadej and Remco's late ability: it's a simple 30-40km tempo effort against whomever behind you can match your pace. Realistically if Tadej or Remco know their reserves their biggest concern isn't the chasers; it's overcooking a corner. The guys behind might take coordinated turns in an attempt to retrieve those two (or one) out front....for about two turns each if the there isn't a significant drop in the gap.haha what? Pog having the strength of 8 (elite) men is not a big enough difference for you?