Member Suspension Appreciation/Depreciation Thread

Page 88 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Dec 7, 2010
5,507
0
0
ebandit said:
ain't brodeal parma-banned?

Nope....no such thing....don't spread unfounded rumors....

Bro is free to post.......he simply chooses not to.

























NOW ONCE AND FOR ALL, MARK.................

COULD YOU PLEASE EXPLAIN TO USE AS TO JUST WHY-IN-THE-HELL YOU POST IN THE MANNER THAT YOU DO?!?!??!



Seriously. Is this something you use in daily correspondence, with friends, relatives, acquaintances, etc?

Or do you reserve the excessive use of .........................

just for the CN forums?



Seriously.

WTF?!?!
 
May 13, 2011
654
0
9,980
This is, honestly, better than a soap opera. My hope is daotec rises up in the mist to haunt the threads again while mewmew is seen strutting off with another cat hand in hand. Make that paw in paw.
 
bad

Granville57 said:
Nope....no such thing....don't spread unfounded rumors....


NOW ONCE AND FOR ALL, MARK.................
COULD YOU PLEASE EXPLAIN TO USE AS TO JUST WHY-IN-THE-HELL YOU POST IN THE MANNER THAT YOU DO?!?!??!

Seriously. Is this something you use in daily correspondence, with friends, relatives, acquaintances, etc?

!

............my bad ..........last time I spotted brodeal post they were banned

.......we live in a world with choices.................ah well? it's a shame that you don't appreciate....

my pompous 'know it all' attitude

Mark L
 
Jul 21, 2012
9,860
3
0
sniper said:
i'm curious as to what their ulterior motives might be.
Does the trolling emanate from extreme fanboyship or do they at least get paid to troll? (honest question)

Deep down most bots know that sky are doping, otherwise they wouldn't bother to show up to the clinic in the first place.

I think the reason they troll so much is because they are upset that the clinic is almost always right.
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
the sceptic said:
Deep down most bots know that sky are doping, otherwise they wouldn't bother to show up to the clinic in the first place.

I think the reason they troll so much is because they are upset that the clinic is almost always right.

Cant disagree with this. The proof was there with Armstrong's bots.
 
Dec 7, 2010
5,507
0
0
ebandit said:
it's a shame that you don't appreciate....

my pompous 'know it all' attitude

Ehhh, you seem to have missed my point.

Allow me another attempt at the question:

Dude, what's the deal with your technique? Why all the...........dots?

And what's with the random spacing of words, the deliberate misuse of grammar, and the disregard for capitalization?

I'm not talking about the content of your thoughts, but rather your method of delivery.

Do you always type like that, or is it something special that you apply only to this forum?
 
Dec 7, 2010
5,507
0
0
Netserk said:
does....... it

matter? :confused:

Sort of. I'd be willing to bet that I'm not the only one curious about it.

It is curious, no?

The only reason I bring it up at all is that Mark L has landed (placed?) himself right in the middle of the latest little soap opera here. Since that means much of the attention is now directed towards him, I think it's a valid question.

It's annoying to me, but that's not particularly significant in the scheme of things. I am quite comfortable with the Ignore feature. I was just wondering if there was some sort of clever reasoning for it or not, because on the surface, it comes across as mostly idiotic.
 
Sep 29, 2012
12,197
0
0
Granville57 said:
It's annoying to me, but that's not particularly significant in the scheme of things. I am quite comfortable with the Ignore feature. I was just wondering if there was some sort of clever reasoning for it or not, because on the surface, it comes across as mostly idiotic.

+infinity.

In fact I think I mentioned it to him (or someone very similar - now I am seeing socks again) when he first started posting, but was doing that aLtErNaTiNg caps thing. Ugh.
 

thehog

BANNED
Jul 27, 2009
31,285
2
22,485
Granville57 said:
Ehhh, you seem to have missed my point.

Allow me another attempt at the question:

Dude, what's the deal with your technique? Why all the...........dots?

And what's with the random spacing of words, the deliberate misuse of grammar, and the disregard for capitalization?

I'm not talking about the content of your thoughts, but rather your method of delivery.

Do you always type like that, or is it something special that you apply only to this forum?

Known as "Ellipses", when not used correctly, i.e. with the lack of three dots it generally refers to a person who wavers or can't make their mind up.

It's a natural occurrence from the brain to keyboard. Most likely ebandit doesn't actually believe what he is typing.
 
Mar 13, 2009
5,245
2
0
Dear Wiggo said:
+infinity.

In fact I think I mentioned it to him (or someone very similar - now I am seeing socks again) when he first started posting, but was doing that aLtErNaTiNg caps thing. Ugh.

ebandit was banned almost right off the bat when he first joined. He joined in August 2012 and his first ban dates September 20th 2012. He was thought to be a sockpuppet of a returning member - I forgot which one though. I'm sure some people remember though, or you could find it if you searched through a few threads. Though it'd probably be a little more complicated seeing that ebandit deletes his posts. It'd also be interesting to know how he succeeded in proving that he was not a sockpuppet - could be helpful for this case. Unfortunately the mod at the time was palmerq, and he doesn't post here anymore.

Personally I think ebandit is just having a laugh with his posting style... and it sets him apart, which is maybe also part of his goal. There are also some other posters with a distinctive pattern, blutto for example. It's less pronounced but it's still a trademark posting style. People have been suspicious of him right from the start (probably due in big part to his posting style), I personally believe he is harmless.
 
Jun 14, 2010
34,930
60
22,580
sniper said:
i'm curious as to what their ulterior motives might be.
Does the trolling emanate from extreme fanboyship or do they at least get paid to troll? (honest question)

Lol, you think an organization that can't be bothered to check in an encyclopedia what bilharzia is is going to pay people to troll an internet board?

Are you crazy?

Why the **** would anyone get paid to troll an internet forum? It's clearly a delusional nutcase. His posts don't hide the massive anger and hatred behind them.
 
Jun 14, 2010
34,930
60
22,580
That said were our friend's repeated references to Vickers yesterday an attempt to claim he himself was Vickers? My original suspicion of late 2014 ebandit hacker being Vickers stemmed largely from his incessant defense of vickers.
Firstly when I said Vickers was a banned troll he went ape **** saying that I was "dehumanizing" Vickers and laughably claimed that sockpuppetry isn't trolling.

He then went further and clearly took further attacks on mv's reputation very personally culminating in him saying Bickers was 10x the poster I was.

Yesterday he was trying to say he and not the spud where Vickers and therefore hog was wrong.

Whatever the story behind the troll account that mv was, I feel.more confident with every episode that I was right in my original claim that Vickers was neither Irish not a lawyer and both were attempts to lend respect and an illusion of impartiality to the account in the same manner Joachim used when he claimed.not to be British (later turned out he was)
 
Jul 21, 2012
9,860
3
0
I think vickers was a genuine person. His twitter is full of the same ramblings he would post here.

I also think there is no chance he would be able to stop posting once he got permabanned. But luckily for him he figured out how to use different ip so there is no evidence against his newest accounts. :rolleyes:
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
the sceptic said:
I think vickers was a genuine person. His twitter is full of the same ramblings he would post here.

I also think there is no chance he would be able to stop posting once he got permabanned. But luckily for him he figured out how to use different ip so there is no evidence against his newest accounts. :rolleyes:

Vickers was outed in here as to his twitter handle. That twitter handle blocks me on twitter, i registered benotti69 on twitter but dont tweet. Only to avoid sockpuppetry.
 
Dec 7, 2010
5,507
0
0
Christian said:
ebandit was banned almost right off the bat when he first joined. He joined in August 2012 and his first ban dates September 20th 2012. He was thought to be a sockpuppet of a returning member
The initial suspicion was that he was a returning incarnation of "Polish."


thehog said:
Most likely ebandit doesn't actually believe what he is typing.
Well, I think "Mark L's" response to me above should be considered confirmation of that. He's deliberately avoided answering my very simple question, all while injecting obfuscation and feigning defensiveness.

When I pointed the contradictions in his claim that he hadn't had previous, direct interaction with me, he cited my superior memory (or words to that effect) as his excuse.

I find his last response to me, in this thread, to be the most telling.

How anyone could think his posting style is anything other than a silly, little game—albeit a deliberate one—is beyond me.

The fact that he was banned shortly after his arrival here only proves the disruptive nature of his activity.
 
Jul 3, 2014
2,351
15
11,510
the sceptic said:
I think vickers was a genuine person. His twitter is full of the same ramblings he would post here.

I also think there is no chance he would be able to stop posting once he got permabanned. But luckily for him he figured out how to use different ip so there is no evidence against his newest accounts. :rolleyes:

You guys most hold him (martin vickers) in very high regard, the way you continue to post about him is quite remarkable.

Maybe, deep down, laurel was right about you and you know he was.

Anyway, I'm off for a rest - toodle pip!
 

thehog

BANNED
Jul 27, 2009
31,285
2
22,485
the sceptic said:
I think vickers was a genuine person. His twitter is full of the same ramblings he would post here.

I also think there is no chance he would be able to stop posting once he got permabanned. But luckily for him he figured out how to use different ip so there is no evidence against his newest accounts. :rolleyes:

SpudVickers should be Parma Banned! :cool: :p
 
Jul 21, 2012
9,860
3
0
TheSpud said:
You guys most hold him (martin vickers) in very high regard, the way you continue to post about him is quite remarkable.

Maybe, deep down, laurel was right about you and you know he was.

Anyway, I'm off for a rest - toodle pip!

don't forget to log into the correct account when you come back. ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts