Member Suspension Appreciation/Depreciation Thread

Page 90 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Status
Not open for further replies.

thehog

BANNED
Jul 27, 2009
31,285
2
22,485
The Hitch said:
What did Granville and netserk actually do?

Ebandit was doing his usual posts which wound up a couple of posters. Net and G were frustrated. Spud and ebandit started reporting posts & complained to the mods. N & G didn't heed the warning and made another comment.

That's why 3 days would be sufficant.

Whether ebandit is a troll or not is debatable but it's clear he is very annoying and doesn't actually engage in discussion. Considering ebandit just came back from a rather suspicious "hack" I think banning posters who are unsure what transpired is a little unfair.

Alas the mods run the forum so we have to respect their decision.
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
Not sure why MJM got banned. Calling a spade a spade not allowed?:mad:

Granville and Netserk upset Berzin and that gets a ban, jeez :rolleyes:
 
Jul 21, 2012
9,860
3
0
Benotti69 said:
Not sure why MJM got banned. Calling a spade a spade not allowed?:mad:

Granville and Netserk upset Berzin and that gets a ban, jeez :rolleyes:

It seems like a backwards way to run a forum to ban good posters that contribute to the forum, while the newest vickers and joachim accounts are allowed to continue to post :confused:
 
Jul 3, 2014
2,351
15
11,510
thehog said:
Spud and ebandit started reporting posts & complained to the mods.

You know that for a fact do you? Do you have some kind of insider knowledge of who reports which posts? Because if you do I think there would be a lot of people on here who would be keen to hear about it and why you would get such a privilege.
 
Jul 3, 2014
2,351
15
11,510
the sceptic said:
It seems like a backwards way to run a forum to ban good posters that contribute to the forum, while the newest vickers and joachim accounts are allowed to continue to post :confused:

Its amazing to me that you're still allowed to post after the baseless accusations you throw around ...
 

thehog

BANNED
Jul 27, 2009
31,285
2
22,485
ebandit said:
..........it's a fair cop guv'nor..............i'm completely to blame

Mark L

No one is blaming you. You know that. But you certainly contributed.

Considering the support given to you after the "hack" you should be a little more appreciative to your fellow forum members. By all means enter into discussion but if several posters adopted a posting style to yours the place would shut down!

Think about it and be good if you could show a little consideration to those who gave you the benefit of doubt.
 
Jul 21, 2012
9,860
3
0
TheSpud said:
Its amazing to me that you're still allowed to post after the baseless accusations you throw around ...

ball, not man.

how can it be baseless when I'm always right? I knew laurel was a sockpuppet long before the "hack". And I'm right this time too.
 
Jun 9, 2014
3,967
1,836
16,680
the sceptic said:
ball, not man.

how can it be baseless when I'm always right? I knew laurel was a sockpuppet long before the "hack". And I'm right this time too.

Always right? Pffttt....yesterday you responded to one of my posts by saying. 'Thanks Martin'

I think your sockpuppet detector is on the fritz.
 
Jul 21, 2012
9,860
3
0
djpbaltimore said:
Always right? Pffttt....yesterday you responded to one of my posts by saying. 'Thanks Martin'

I think your sockpuppet detector is on the fritz.

lol! posted from the wrong account now? hurry up and delete the post. ;)
 
Jul 3, 2014
2,351
15
11,510
djpbaltimore said:
Always right? Pffttt....yesterday you responded to one of my posts by saying. 'Thanks Martin'

I think your sockpuppet detector is on the fritz.

He seems obsessed with him to me. And he accused samhocking of being a sockpuppet - he just cant help himself (and before you ask for the link, you know as well as I do that it was removed by the mods).
 
Jun 9, 2014
3,967
1,836
16,680
the sceptic said:
lol! posted from the wrong account now? hurry up and delete the post. ;)

I thank whichever mod deleted your false accusation. If you were intellectually honest, you would just admit that you were wrong and let it go. The ironic thing is that I've actually posted my real world identity on this forum.
 
Jul 3, 2014
2,351
15
11,510
the sceptic said:
do I have to quote theste posts again?

You can quote those posts as often as you like if you feel the need to make a comparison again, it proves nothing.

Hang on, I just used three words you used there - I must be a sockpuppet of you. Which means you / me / martin vickers must be one and the same person - now that is a surprising twist.
 
Jul 21, 2012
9,860
3
0
TheSpud said:
You can quote those posts as often as you like if you feel the need to make a comparison again, it proves nothing.

Hang on, I just used three words you used there - I must be a sockpuppet of you. Which means you / me / martin vickers must be one and the same person - now that is a surprising twist.

Well, in that case maybe you could quote me a post of another poster using the "nothing, nada, zilch" line, since it's so common?
 
Jul 21, 2012
9,860
3
0
TheSpud said:
You'll find a lot of people use those words, and its not for me to justify why your vocabulary isn't as broad as theirs. But then again maybe it is ...

http://forum.cyclingnews.com/showpost.php?p=1446986&postcount=58

That post is of course a parody on the classic vickers troll bot style but you knew that so my point still stands.

For someone who only posted in the clinic for his own amusement and didn't even care about the forum you sure come back a lot. :rolleyes:
 
Jul 25, 2012
12,967
1,970
25,680
thehog said:
I think Sceptic was actually being ironic rather than using the phrase per se.

Sceptic is a big boy, he can deal with his own blunders without "the guys" showing up.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.