http://www.competitivecyclist.com/whats-new/what-s-going-on-with-merlin-an-update.433.html
So the original plan for buying Merlin, aside from the BS that CC was slinging when they bought the brand, was to market other makers' goods under the brand of Merlin because, you know, making your own sh!t would be staring into the abyss. Somebody should tell Moots before they fall in.
NAHBS seemed like the perfect place for our kickoff. It's a show that celebrates craft while simultaneously extending a big middle finger to the bike industry. There's an appealing lack of retailer politics and the tedium of distribution and market talk. Like nearly all the brands present at NAHBS, Merlin would put the customer first, not the bike shop.
We contacted the show about reserving booth space. But its reply was heartbreaking. Registration was limited to brands conforming to, among other things, these regulations:
"FRAME BUILDERS: PRIMARY DISPLAY BIKES ONLY (YOU BUILT THESE IN YOUR WORKSHOP).
No bicycles are permitted in any frame builder’s booth other than those built by the exhibitor, and if branded, bearing the exhibitor’s brand.
No sub-contracted bicycles are permitted. Not even those by a current-year NAHBS exhibitor."
Given the vast untapped capacity for titanium bike production in the US, we never gave a moment's thought to anything except subcontracting Merlin's production. Doing otherwise would be staring into the economic abyss.
So the original plan for buying Merlin, aside from the BS that CC was slinging when they bought the brand, was to market other makers' goods under the brand of Merlin because, you know, making your own sh!t would be staring into the abyss. Somebody should tell Moots before they fall in.