Mikel Landa Discussion Thread

Page 79 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
I am in agreement with Lance Armstrong (of all people). Kwiatkowski wasn't dropped today before making contact. Brailsford/Portal told him to wait for Froome. If they had allowed him to join the group Landa would be in yellow tonight with a minute lead over Nairo. Instead Kaiatkowski dropped back and worked with froome. Otherwise he would've been no help to Froome.
 
Re:

perico said:
I am in agreement with Lance Armstrong (of all people). Kwiatkowski wasn't dropped today before making contact. Brailsford/Portal told him to wait for Froome. If they had allowed him to join the group Landa would be in yellow tonight with a minute lead over Nairo. Instead Kaiatkowski dropped back and worked with froome. Otherwise he would've been no help to Froome.

I don't think that Kwiatkowski would have made that big of a difference (The Froome group didn't work all that well together with him in it anyway, so the difference would have just been the extra speed in the breakaway group). Still, Landa, Quintana (and Contador!) would probably be around 40-50 seconds better off on GC imo.
 
Re: Re:

gregrowlerson said:
perico said:
I am in agreement with Lance Armstrong (of all people). Kwiatkowski wasn't dropped today before making contact. Brailsford/Portal told him to wait for Froome. If they had allowed him to join the group Landa would be in yellow tonight with a minute lead over Nairo. Instead Kaiatkowski dropped back and worked with froome. Otherwise he would've been no help to Froome.

I don't think that Kwiatkowski would have made that big of a difference (The Froome group didn't work all that well together with him in it anyway, so the difference would have just been the extra speed in the breakaway group). Still, Landa, Quintana (and Contador!) would probably be around 40-50 seconds better off on GC imo.
Had he worked for Landa on that descent and Froome had no one to work with I think he would've made a much bigger difference. Maybe not a minute lead, but enough. An extra 40-50 seconds would've put him within 20 seconds of the lead.
 
Re: Re:

rick james said:
elfed68 said:
lenric said:
I want Landa to go rogue. But that wouldn't be smart of him, since if it went south, he'd have a hard time finding a good team next year.

Is his next team not already signed and sealed? Trek Segafredo would be good.
why? because he went on one attack with Bertie?
Because Bertie has one foot out the door already, and because anyone would pick Landa over Mollema.

Only issue could be if Contador and Landa both want sole Giro leadership, which is probably the case.

I don't see it happening though. Landa should have a decent number of teams who want him, depending on his salary demands. If he does great in the other two mountain stages and shows one of the best climbers in the Tour after riding the Giro, he's gonna drown in offers.
 
The obvious tactic from sky from here on in would be to send Landa off the front and on the attack, have the others chase him down with Froome wheel sucking and then counter attacking. This will only work if the other teams are short of dom's to lead the chase which is likely to be the case in the big stages on the Alps. Deep down I don't think sky will want Landa to win the race since he is leaving at the end of the season. Therefore if he attacks I think the other teams should give him a bit of rope as it will play with Froome's head seeing his team mate go up the road and very likely into yellow. If Landa went into yellow with a small lead of < 30 seconds it wouldn't be the worst result in the world for the other teams as it will create more friction within sky.

The other dynamic is for Froome to wheel suck all the way to the penultimate stage knowing that he will likely have enough in the tank to win it in the TT. Aru and Bardet know that they need to attack Froome at some stage to stand a chance of winning the race. Aru seems up for the fight and played clever tactics yesterday considering how isolated he was. However now he has 2 sky riders to worry about.
 
I really doubt Brailsford likes Froome enough to risk Sky's chances at winning by ruining Landa's race. I would rather take him as somebody who'd just unemotionally drop Froome if necessary and look for a new Tour contender next year, maybe a French one as he's suggested in the past.

If Landa's actually strong enough, he'll still get his shot imo.
 
Back to the train...till Wednesday when he follows Contador's wheel along Quintana in the Telegraphe.

Now, being serious I thing it may depend on what team has he signed with. If he has already signed with Movistar or any other team, he will go rogue. If he still has the option to resign with Sky, maybe not.

Apparently the informations that confirm him signing with Movistar are incorrect. There is no compromise, his caché is going up and up this past weeks.
 
Also, if Sky thinks that Landa will be a conventional domestique to burn himself before some km's to go, they are wrong.

Team leader is Froome, but Mikel it's not stupid: he is top-5 in the Tour de France with a minute time to the leader and this occassions may well happen once in a lifetime.
 
Re:

KyoGrey said:
Also, if Sky thinks that Landa will be a conventional domestique to burn himself before some km's to go, they are wrong.

Team leader is Froome, but Mikel it's not stupid: he is top-5 in the Tour de France with a minute time to the leader and this occassions may well happen once in a lifetime.
...like Vino thought, and Ulle/Kloden did the chasing. Remember?

He's not stupid, but he's stuck in a deal that spells: you're a dom. He signed up with Sky...there was an understanding. Like De Las Cuevas with Banesto in a way. Foreigner in a team, sponsors don't want you sharing the headlines. Shut up and pedal...sad but true.
 
Re: Re:

Tonton said:
KyoGrey said:
Also, if Sky thinks that Landa will be a conventional domestique to burn himself before some km's to go, they are wrong.

Team leader is Froome, but Mikel it's not stupid: he is top-5 in the Tour de France with a minute time to the leader and this occassions may well happen once in a lifetime.
...like Vino thought, and Ulle/Kloden did the chasing. Remember?

He's not stupid, but he's stuck in a deal that spells: you're a dom. He signed up with Sky...there was an understanding. Like De Las Cuevas with Banesto in a way. Foreigner in a team, sponsors don't want you sharing the headlines. Shut up and pedal...sad but true.

Yes, like with Kloden having to ride for Vino at Astana when he was better placed in the gc and had better legs. But we don't even know if the latter will be true for Landa and Froome in the alps.
 
Re: Re:

Tonton said:
KyoGrey said:
Also, if Sky thinks that Landa will be a conventional domestique to burn himself before some km's to go, they are wrong.

Team leader is Froome, but Mikel it's not stupid: he is top-5 in the Tour de France with a minute time to the leader and this occassions may well happen once in a lifetime.
...like Vino thought, and Ulle/Kloden did the chasing. Remember?

He's not stupid, but he's stuck in a deal that spells: you're a dom. He signed up with Sky...there was an understanding. Like De Las Cuevas with Banesto in a way. Foreigner in a team, sponsors don't want you sharing the headlines. Shut up and pedal...sad but true.

We'll see. I not saying is a given that he will look also for himself in the Alps, but if race circumstances deal him good cards in his hands, he can take the chance for sure.

And to be honest, given the stellar form that Kwiatkowski is in (wasted by Sky stage after stage, of course), Froome may even never need Landa to pace himself to victory.

Not sure if the De las Cuevas - Banesto is the best example of loyal domestique. :D