- Aug 6, 2015
- 4,139
- 2
- 0
hfer07 said:I just learnt the bvullsh!t rift on Landa for not "waiting" for Froome....in the last 100 mts going uphill? WTF is wrong with the SKY management? WTF?![]()
Landa: we love you- just get the fvck out of that team ASAP!!!
hfer07 said:I just learnt the bvullsh!t rift on Landa for not "waiting" for Froome....in the last 100 mts going uphill? WTF is wrong with the SKY management? WTF?![]()
Landa: we love you- just get the fvck out of that team ASAP!!!
KyoGrey said:If Mikel Landa was called Geraint Thomas or Peter Kennaugh or any of the other pets and sported a Union Jack in his maillot, there would't be any problem for not nursing Froome for 100 m.
Portal freaked out because they knew that Landa is a real danger to Froome if he goes rogue.
Red Rick said:Man, Landa's sprint looked great from the overhead vieuw in replay. Crazy how he flew straight by Froome.
portugal11 said:Will sky do a 2007 rabobank and get landa out of the race? (I know very different situations but I can't remember other situation when a team banned a rider on a gt)
A silly question.lenric said:https://twitter.com/Manufs90/status/885524665741045761
Zinoviev Letter said:KyoGrey said:If Mikel Landa was called Geraint Thomas or Peter Kennaugh or any of the other pets and sported a Union Jack in his maillot, there would't be any problem for not nursing Froome for 100 m.
Portal freaked out because they knew that Landa is a real danger to Froome if he goes rogue.
Landa is three minutes down with a TT still to come and is not a threat to win the Tour outside of the fantasies of a few on this forum. What Sky would be worried about if they thought he was actually going to go rogue - which they don't because he won't - would be team division and chaos handing the race to one of the actual threats. Like the guy who is currently in yellow and 3 mins ahead of Landa.
As for the Brits thing, it's certainly an advantage to be a Brit on Sky, just as it's an advantage to be from the right country on any of the quasi national teams. But those advantages do not extend to being allowed to abandon your role helping their team leader at the Tour to pursue your own ambitions. As we saw previously with Froome himself.
I don't like Sky's way of doing things. I'd love it if Landa went full Gadret. It would be hilarious. But please let's not confuse forlorn hopes for race analysis.
KyoGrey said:Zinoviev Letter said:KyoGrey said:If Mikel Landa was called Geraint Thomas or Peter Kennaugh or any of the other pets and sported a Union Jack in his maillot, there would't be any problem for not nursing Froome for 100 m.
Portal freaked out because they knew that Landa is a real danger to Froome if he goes rogue.
Landa is three minutes down with a TT still to come and is not a threat to win the Tour outside of the fantasies of a few on this forum. What Sky would be worried about if they thought he was actually going to go rogue - which they don't because he won't - would be team division and chaos handing the race to one of the actual threats. Like the guy who is currently in yellow and 3 mins ahead of Landa.
As for the Brits thing, it's certainly an advantage to be a Brit on Sky, just as it's an advantage to be from the right country on any of the quasi national teams. But those advantages do not extend to being allowed to abandon your role helping their team leader at the Tour to pursue your own ambitions. As we saw previously with Froome himself.
I don't like Sky's way of doing things. I'd love it if Landa went full Gadret. It would be hilarious. But please let's not confuse forlorn hopes for race analysis.
Yeah, of course, Landa winning the Tour is very fantastic.
But Landa riding for his own and abandoning team work at key occasions in the event of Froome not feeling good can perfectly happen given his character. That is why Portal went on him, to cut him short.
Meh, it all depends on Froome and if he cracks today for team cohesion to be mantained.
Landa has almost never disobeyed team orders. In the Giro 2015, he stuck with Aru for a long time, and only really dropped him on Madonna Di Campiglio, in the last 200m. On the Mortirolo he was allowed by Aru and Astana to go up and drop him, and take the stage. Then on the Sestriere stage he obeyed, in tears, the seemingly stupid instructions to drop and wait for Aru, so Aru could take 2nd in the race. The only time when he went against it was in the 2015 Vuelta, when he stayed up the road instead of dropping back and pacing Aru on the Andorra stage, but that was pretty minor.KyoGrey said:Zinoviev Letter said:KyoGrey said:If Mikel Landa was called Geraint Thomas or Peter Kennaugh or any of the other pets and sported a Union Jack in his maillot, there would't be any problem for not nursing Froome for 100 m.
Portal freaked out because they knew that Landa is a real danger to Froome if he goes rogue.
Landa is three minutes down with a TT still to come and is not a threat to win the Tour outside of the fantasies of a few on this forum. What Sky would be worried about if they thought he was actually going to go rogue - which they don't because he won't - would be team division and chaos handing the race to one of the actual threats. Like the guy who is currently in yellow and 3 mins ahead of Landa.
As for the Brits thing, it's certainly an advantage to be a Brit on Sky, just as it's an advantage to be from the right country on any of the quasi national teams. But those advantages do not extend to being allowed to abandon your role helping their team leader at the Tour to pursue your own ambitions. As we saw previously with Froome himself.
I don't like Sky's way of doing things. I'd love it if Landa went full Gadret. It would be hilarious. But please let's not confuse forlorn hopes for race analysis.
Yeah, of course, Landa winning the Tour is very fantastic.
But Landa riding for his own and abandoning team work at key occasions in the event of Froome not feeling good can perfectly happen given his character. That is why Portal went on him, to cut him short.
Meh, it all depends on Froome and if he cracks today for team cohesion to be mantained.
Matteo. said:A silly question.lenric said:https://twitter.com/Manufs90/status/885524665741045761
It is true that in logical rigor, he would have to wait and help froome but ... in 300m @ 15% what could he do? Load the dawg on shoulders and bring him to the finish line? Not to mention that he could take away the bonuses