Kokoso said:
King Boonen said:
Irondan said:
Kokoso said:
[quote="
It’s both, along with flaming, baiting and being disrespectful to another forum member.
Perhaps a quick read through the forum rules will help you to not cross the line again, if that’s what you hope to avoid.
To expand a bit. Question the post, not the poster. It's fine to disagree with a post, as long as you back it up, but just accusing a poster of being stupid is always going to result in action, no matter what the circumstances.
But I was not accusing poster of being stupid.
Edit:
there is a difference between saying someone is stupid and saying someone is acting stupid, isn't it?
Not really, no. But there's a big difference in saying someone is acting stupid or saying that they're stupid and
saying that a post is stupid. By calling a post stupid it still is a poor choice of words but it's not making the comment personal. Anytime you make a derogatory remark and you make it personal you'll run into problems. Am I saying that you should call everyone's post "stupid" when you don't agree with it? Absolutely not, you should always think about a better choice of words to describe a post that you think is stupid.
We're here to discuss each other's comments, not the poster personally. Which is exactly what King Boonen alluded to above in pointing out the "Post, Not Poster" policy.
Not really, no. But there's a big difference in saying someone is acting stupid or saying that they're stupid and saying that a post is stupid. By calling a post stupid it still is a poor choice of words but it's not making the comment personal.
I have hard time to agree. To me to call post stupid seems closer to say someone is acting stupid than to say someone is stupid. By saying someone is acting stupid you don't say he is stupid at all, you say he's manipulating things (and probably cleverly, but I admit it is not neccesary part of it). Now I know that to say someone he's manipulating things you would not like either, but what if it's spot on?
We're here to discuss each other's comments, not the poster personally. Which is exactly what King Boonen alluded to above in pointing out the "Post, Not Poster" policy.
To say "someone is acting stupid" in reaction to post is not discussing poster personally, it is discussing his/her way of reaction. Still I agree it is poor choice of words, I agree, but what if it's spot on? Anyway, I disagree on the basis.