Moderators

Page 195 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Aug 12, 2012
6,996
1,011
20,680
King Boonen said:
I've never said it doesn't, as long as it's consistent performance above what is humanly possible, not isolated events.


Are you allowed to mention doping in here? I would assume not.

So I will answer you in the clinic
 
Apr 30, 2011
47,145
29,774
28,180
Taxus4a said:
Del 1962 said something that is true and that must not be allowed in a moderator. Moderators has his rules as well, hasnt they?

A moderator should not trolling

:)

Where did I troll?
 
Aug 5, 2010
11,027
89
22,580
I also heard Netserk doesn't pull up the toilet seat when he pees!!!! That kind of behaviour is simply unacceptable from an internet forum administrator!!!!

Honestly, of all the complains about the mods the skyfans have come up with, this is by far the most desperate and honestly is just plain idiotic.
 
May 15, 2011
45,171
617
24,680
Lol what a funny discussion.

Imo who cares what mods say on twitter. They are normal people on twitter. Not mods.
 
Apr 30, 2011
47,145
29,774
28,180
darwin553 said:
You're in a position to pass it on but then again it is about you so I can't see you being that inclined to do so :rolleyes:
What can I do that others can't? His E-mail is public. The same with his twitter profile. Every member here can PM him.
 
Jun 25, 2013
1,442
0
0
Netserk said:
What can I do that others can't? His E-mail is public. The same with his twitter profile. Every member here can PM him.

A message from you will carry more weight than from a regular member ;)
 
Aug 12, 2012
6,996
1,011
20,680
Netserk said:
Where did I troll?

You are traying to compare a situation about you with other of Froome that has no any possible comparative, and you know are trolling.

You are always trying to put as conspirative things or proofs things that are not evidence or proof, and trying to hide the evidence or differents about now and the dark era and try to compare things.

For example to say Leinders in SKy means doping is trolling.

The story of froome has a clear explication, you can believe or you can not, but there is a clear explication. You are not the man in Twitter, has not a clear explication...
anyway you can say in twitter what you want, but what i dont like it is that I have been banned for something a lot of people do here, and I ask the same for me.
 
Apr 30, 2011
47,145
29,774
28,180
Taxus4a said:
You are traying to compare a situation about you with other of Froome that has no any possible comparative, and you know are trolling.

You are always trying to put as conspirative things or proofs things that are not evidence or proof, and trying to hide the evidence or differents about now and the dark era and try to compare things.

For example to say Leinders in SKy means doping is trolling.

The story of froome has a clear explication, you can believe or you can not, but there is a clear explication. You are not the man in Twitter, has not a clear explication...
anyway you can say in twitter what you want, but what i dont like it is that I have been banned for something a lot of people do here, and I ask the same for me.
:confused:
 
Aug 16, 2011
10,819
2
0
Ah, there's the good ol forum discussions. Sky fans trying to make the mods appear bad for what they do outside the forum...members hurling trolling accusations as each other...and members just taking small comments way to seriously. It's good to be back. :D
 
Jul 5, 2012
2,878
1
11,485
Taxus4a said:
... First of all:
I didnt read anything about stop...I dont read all the forum, and there is not a warning when you are quoted, so, please, before been banned, send a private if something is wrong. :)

Second tihing: I dont Know what is rabbiting, but if I talk about that fact it is becouse is a fact I can prove, and it is an important fact, wind is always an important fact in cycling. If we are in the clinic is a very important fact, becouse there are a lot of people repiting always the same things without any evidence or fact.

So, this is very amazing for me, if you try to stop the arguments and the facts, and let the emply opinions.

No censure!!.

1) maybe you should read "anything" before you post. Others managed it just fine.

2) you are rabbiting on again. Capiche?

3) correct. no censure.
 
Mar 12, 2010
545
0
0
LaFlorecita said:
Lol what a funny discussion.

Imo who cares what mods say on twitter. They are normal people on twitter. Not mods.

I think describing Netty as normal either here or on twitter is extremely generous ;) 27 followers, that's 27 people in the entire world who even give a flying **** what Netserk says on twitter anyway. And most of those are forum members. If he had 10,000 followers then maybe he has to behave himself on twitter, but 27, **** me, there's more people in my yoga class.
 
Apr 30, 2011
47,145
29,774
28,180
TheGame said:
I think describing Netty as normal either here or on twitter is extremely generous ;) 27 followers, that's 27 people in the entire world who even give a flying **** what Netserk says on twitter anyway. And most of those are forum members. If he had 10,000 followers then maybe he has to behave himself on twitter, but 27, **** me, there's more people in my yoga class.
Who gives a **** about the amount of followers one has?

Bieber has 42 million.
Mauro Vegni has ~1000
 
Mar 12, 2010
545
0
0
Netserk said:
Who gives a **** about the amount of followers one has?

Bieber has 42 million.
Mauro Vegni has ~1000

The point being, while you only have 27 followers it really isn't a big deal what the hell you say on twitter. It's not like you are bringing the forum into widespread disrepute.

Now if Bieber was a moderator here, and started trolling to his 42 million followers about Sky fanboys, Daniel Benson would probably have an entirely different opinion.
 
Mar 18, 2009
14,644
81
22,580
sittingbison said:
Quality not quantity ;)

Being one of Netserk's followers, I can confirm that each one of us is worth at least two million followers of Bieber, probably three or four.
 
Jul 10, 2010
2,906
1
0
del1962 said:
. . .
Yopu (sic, you) are also allowed to discuss moderators in this thread, so it is not a personal attack, . . .

Not necessarily true - keep reading:

thirteen said:
you are allowed to discuss moderators in this thread as it pertains to their moderating skills, not what they may or may not think or say, especially away from the actual forum constraints.
. . .

Just like the rules we apply in the other areas of the forum - don't attack the messenger, attack the message. In other words - be specific, point to a specific action or post - and get your reasoning in line. No using false logic as shown in that great infographic here:
http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/visualizations/rhetological-fallacies/

Thirteen put it exceedingly well.
 
Sep 14, 2009
6,300
3,561
23,180
Taxus4a said:
You are traying to compare a situation about you with other of Froome that has no any possible comparative, and you know are trolling.

You are always trying to put as conspirative things or proofs things that are not evidence or proof, and trying to hide the evidence or differents about now and the dark era and try to compare things.

For example to say Leinders in SKy means doping is trolling.

The story of froome has a clear explication, you can believe or you can not, but there is a clear explication. You are not the man in Twitter, has not a clear explication...
anyway you can say in twitter what you want, but what i dont like it is that I have been banned for something a lot of people do here, and I ask the same for me.

WTH are you talking 'bout Willis?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.