- Feb 23, 2014
- 8,827
- 254
- 17,880
Granville57 said:I won the internets tonight!
![]()
I was trying to understand what your were doing....At one point someone nearly ruined it for you - congratulations.
Granville57 said:I won the internets tonight!
![]()
Ventoux Boar said:The casual racial slurs, misogyny (how can adults tolerate the bile spewed at Michelle Cound?), and neanderthal references to sexuality in The Clinic are completely out of order.
Why has self-policing failed so dismally?
Ventoux Boar said:The casual racial slurs, misogyny (how can adults tolerate the bile spewed at Michelle Cound?), and neanderthal references to sexuality in The Clinic are completely out of order.
Why has self-policing failed so dismally?
martinvickers said:There certainly appears to be a somewhat less strict moderation of long time posters, especially of the more 'sceptical' kind. Some sort of founders effect, I assume. It is only a forum at the end of the day, and it's reputation is, apparently, well known, so while it may be off-putting to those outside that group, I'm not convinced any real harm can be caused.
I doubt any reasonable person, for example, will take their cues on sensitive issues of sexuality from a short bout of unfortunate sneering buried in a forum topic.
Mellow Velo said:Got it in one.
Hardly surprising given several of the more recent mods come from the same faction.
Leave any expectancy of equanimity at the door.
Ferminal said:Just like all those Lance hater mods.
Mellow Velo said:Got it in one.
Hardly surprising given several of the more recent mods come from the same faction.
Leave any expectancy of equanimity at the door.
Mellow Velo said:LOL
Kind of redundant, now the poster who brought up mod inconsistency has
been permanently retired.
sittingbison said:complete BS
not surprising coming from someone quoting martinvickers
sittingbison said:complete BS
not surprising coming from someone quoting martinvickers
del1962 said:The relentless powertrip of the mods continuues![]()
Mellow Velo said:That's cheap, even by your standards.
We aren't all blessed with your powers to change posting history.
As for the BS, we both know it isn't since I too read that twitter exchange about getting a certain poster banned.
Plus, the proof is in the forum posting. (and banning history)
But hey, if everybody is happy, I'm happy.
It was time to bail out again, since there's no real opportunity to debate nowadays.
Enjoy your Tour.
sittingbison said:complete BS
not surprising coming from someone quoting martinvickers
thehog said:Mellow your one of the best posters here. I much prefer you stay. I'm not sure why you feel things are so unjust here. It's not like your getting banned a lot.
My preference would be you keep posting and not get drawn into any great conspiracy that the mods are biased.
Mellow Velo said:That's cheap, even by your standards.
We aren't all blessed with your powers to change posting history.
As for the BS, we both know it isn't since I too read that twitter exchange about getting a certain poster banned.
Plus, the proof is in the forum posting. (and banning history)
But hey, if everybody is happy, I'm happy.
It was time to bail out again, since there's no real opportunity to debate nowadays.
Enjoy your Tour.
Mellow Velo said:Thanks for the vote of confidence, hog.
Good to see that you had to ask who Martin's sockpuppet account was.
Read my post above the one you quoted and you will see it is now accredited to MartinV.
My reply was originally posted to Packfodder, Martin's SP.
Bison felt it was perfectly fine to alter this post to make his point.
(but, in doing so, made my point)
Which would be a ban offence for us, I believe?
I've never fancied p*ssing into the wind. Better things to do with my time.
Besides, I'm sure there will be plenty to talk about in the coming three weeks and some new *pack fodder* for the Clinic to chew up!
del1962 said:Question for mods
is it acceptable to use a swear word with one asterix in it
like when used in this post http://forum.cyclingnews.com/showpost.php?p=1509157&postcount=584
RedheadDane said:This is just a test. Please don't ban me.
f*ck
So, if you apply the censoring yourself it accepts it as such.
Netserk said:Much better would be to update the word filter so people actually respect it. Can I link to http://www.****iociclismo.it/ ? Can I write ****stan? Oh but surely it'll censor ***...
Yeah seems weird. There's two level of censoring: only when the word is alone (*** and *** vs. xyid and xass) and always censored (f*ck and $lut vs. x**** and x****). Doesn't really make sense why P-A-K-I is in the second category.Libertine Seguros said:The thing that's frustrating is, this type of selective censorship, where it recognizes particular contexts where a word is not offensive, but does not apply it consistently.
For example, I can discuss the language of Yiddish, however if I were to use the word for 'Jew' in that language, ***, it is often used by gentiles as a racial slur and is censored.
But if this is okay, then why is it not ok to discuss the country of which Islamabad is the capital city, because the first part of its name has similarly become a racial epithet?
Why does the censor recognise that Y I D is not offensive when followed by -dish, but not that P A K I is not offensive when followed by -stan?
del1962 said:Question for mods
is it acceptable to use a swear word with one asterix in it
like when used in this post http://forum.cyclingnews.com/showpost.php?p=1509157&postcount=584
