Moderators

Page 344 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Jul 21, 2012
9,860
3
0
del1962 said:
Ever thought about not allowing new members to post without pre-moderation, I am sure you could set the software up to do this

But how would skybots on new accounts be able to jump straight into discussions then?
 
Apr 30, 2011
47,071
29,679
28,180
del1962 said:
Ever thought about not allowing new members to post without pre-moderation, I am sure you could set the software up to do this
Sounds like fun in July.
 
Dec 30, 2009
3,801
1
13,485
del1962 said:
Ever thought about not allowing new members to post without pre-moderation, I am sure you could set the software up to do this

I doubt that would ever happen but we are keeping an eye on 'suspect' new joiners by user name given current spam attacks..
 
Dec 7, 2010
5,507
0
0
Oh jesus! Here we go again!!!!!

:eek:

Spam-Attack-on-Scottish-Association-of-Landlords.jpg




[edit]
Well that was dealt with swiftly.

Excellent Mod superiority on display. :cool:
 
Jul 11, 2013
3,340
0
0
Afrank said:
Not on my watch. :cool:

Is it allowed to open a counter-spam thread?

A thread to place all the excellent counter-spamming posted recently?

Maybe it could ease some of the frustration -and apply some fun when they come and attack us...?

Most of the clever re-trollling gets lost when they are banned...

We can call it "The official counter-spam thread"...

And once you've solved the problem we can close it...

What do you say?
 
Aug 16, 2011
10,819
2
0
mrhender said:
Is it allowed to open a counter-spam thread?

A thread to place all the excellent counter-spamming posted recently?

Maybe it could ease some of the frustration -and apply some fun when they come and attack us...?

Most of the clever re-trollling gets lost when they are banned...

We can call it "The official counter-spam thread"...

And once you've solved the problem we can close it...

What do you say?

Not entirely sure what kind of posts such a thread would be made up of...but sure, why not. Doesn't sound like it would violate the rules.
 
Jul 11, 2013
3,340
0
0
Afrank said:
Not entirely sure what kind of posts such a thread would be made up of...but sure, why not. Doesn't sound like it would violate the rules.

Thanks!! wait a few moments and you will see :p
 
Dec 7, 2010
5,507
0
0
This is just getting stupid now.

Korean BMW spam attacks have swamped the place.

Anyone from Benson's side of the fence working on this?

[edit]

LOL

That was fast. The Mod Squad rules. :cool:
 
Aug 16, 2011
10,819
2
0
Granville57 said:
This is just getting stupid now.

Korean BMW spam attacks have swamped the place.

Anyone from Benson's side of the fence working on this?

[edit]

LOL

That was fast. The Mod Squad rules. :cool:

IT is working on putting up better spam filters.
 

thehog

BANNED
Jul 27, 2009
31,285
2
22,485
ebandit said:
Skeppy...may I call you Skeppy?....it appears you have no clue about what the CIRC is for.....no wonder you keep thinking I am wrong.......

Mark L

ebandit said:
.........you've made another mistake Hoggie....just because you can't see something doesn't mean it isn't there.....you've lost your sharpness Hoggie.....making mistakes all over the place

Mark L

ebandit said:
Ah Hoggie's little echo is back......its a pity you don't scrutinise your Master's theories a little more closely.....it doesn't take much to notice the inconsistency.....before Hoggie's last last-chance ban, or was it the last-chance ban before, I forget, Hoggie was desperately trying to make JTL's doping a Sky issue....unfortunately those dots go off in different directions

Mark L

ebandit said:
.....really Hoggie, you've gone soft during your last ban......lost your troll-fu......:D

Mark L

ebandit said:
You've lost your touch Hoggie........your trolling is now so amateurish and illogical its like watching a p155-trousered tramp shouting nonsense at passers-by.........that the forum's once great master troll is reduced to this........

Mark L

Some fairly serious bait and name calling been thrown here.

Could this at least be addressed? Changing users names, labelling users trolls and drunk tramps?

p155-trousered tramp

Which means "drunk trousered tramp"

Is this appropriate?
 

thehog

BANNED
Jul 27, 2009
31,285
2
22,485
Dear Wiggo said:
I think more he is actually insinuating you are wetting your pants. Urine not alcohol.

Possibly. I'm not sure what he is insinuating but clear its personal and its bait.

It also is deriding homeless people whom are less fortunate than ourselves. It's a very disappointing statement to make.

Not sure what else can said.

I've removed myself from the thread as it's going nowhere now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.