Most Suspicious Performance Of The Last 5 Years

Page 17 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Mar 13, 2009
29,413
3,482
28,180
Re: Re:

kingjr said:
Benotti69 said:
kingjr said:
Not even close

Domoulin has ridden 7 GTs before this Giro and only finished 3. Not a great record or a showing of potential for GTs.
With the Vuelta in mind, this is not even close.
Seeing Dumoulin literally crashed out in 2 of those GT's and got ill in the other 2, the DNF's don't tell us something.
The fact that he was already 41th, without riding for GC, as 23(could be 22, dont remember) year old does. And obv vuelta 2015
 
Apr 30, 2011
47,181
29,825
28,180
Erik Zabel was 40th in his last Tour at the age of 38, obviously not riding for GC. It doesn't really mean much.
 
Sep 9, 2012
5,276
2,490
20,680
Re:

Netserk said:
Erik Zabel was 40th in his last Tour at the age of 38, obviously not riding for GC. It doesn't really mean much.
Came in before Nibali on L'Alpe d'Huez :cool:
 
Jul 15, 2013
896
0
4,580
Re: Re:

kingjr said:
Netserk said:
Erik Zabel was 40th in his last Tour at the age of 38, obviously not riding for GC. It doesn't really mean much.
Came in before Nibali on L'Alpe d'Huez :cool:
Came in before Nibali and Hesjedal; only 9 places down on another future multiple GT winner. Who would've guessed back then, with Andy Schleck finishing 3rd and Contador winning 2 GTs that season.
 
Mar 13, 2009
29,413
3,482
28,180
I'm just saying, Dumoulin was never a bad climber. He was instantly good on hills (because he lives in the region were Amstel gold is held..), but just wasn't used to the longer efforts on long climbs. It took some time to learn to pace himself on longer climbs, and he found it especially hard when he was forced to follow somebody else's pace. (slower or faster).
 
May 3, 2015
4,833
4,404
21,180
Re:

Dekker_Tifosi said:
I'm just saying, Dumoulin was never a bad climber. He was instantly good on hills (because he lives in the region were Amstel gold is held..), but just wasn't used to the longer efforts on long climbs. It took some time to learn to pace himself on longer climbs, and he found it especially hard when he was forced to follow somebody else's pace. (slower or faster).

Fully agree. Looking at his amateur results it was alwaysclear he could climb. Iam sure he does what it takes to win, but compared to Wiggins, for example, his performance doesn't really qualify for "most suspicous performance of the last 5 years".
 
Jul 14, 2015
708
0
0
I humbly submit Fuglsang and Aru dropping everyone on a hellish >10% climb while having shown exactly nothing, zero all year.
 
May 4, 2011
4,285
783
17,680
Re:

hazaran said:
I humbly submit Fuglsang and Aru dropping everyone on a hellish >10% climb while having shown exactly nothing, zero all year.
And unlike Aru, Fuglsang has never shown this climbing level before.

I half expected Fuglsang to go full-*** this year, back when he was supposed to be Astana's only GC guy for the Tour. (With Lopez a maybe, not likely to be in decent enough shape, if selected).
 
Jun 27, 2013
5,217
9
17,495
Re: Re:

18-Valve. (pithy) said:
hazaran said:
I humbly submit Fuglsang and Aru dropping everyone on a hellish >10% climb while having shown exactly nothing, zero all year.
And unlike Aru, Fuglsang has never shown this climbing level before.

Yes he has. At this very race he's even showed better climbing. When he first showed up.
Then he spent years being mediocre and now he's back at that level for whatever reason.
 
Jul 9, 2014
419
138
9,480
Re:

hazaran said:
I humbly submit Fuglsang and Aru dropping everyone on a hellish >10% climb while having shown exactly nothing, zero all year.
Every victory in cycling should be considred as suspicious really, but Fuglsang doesn't belong up there with the nuclear Froome on Mont Ventoux and - let's say - Gilbert in the cobbled classics.

Since his first year as a pro, Fuglsang did some good climbing, especially in Dauphine, as far I remember. In the Tour, he will eventually fade, like he always do.
 
Jul 15, 2016
2,152
192
6,680
Let's see if Richie Porte can get to the top of the list with his Tour de France performance.

Keeping my fingers crossed...
 
May 4, 2011
4,285
783
17,680
Re: Re:

GuyIncognito said:
18-Valve. (pithy) said:
hazaran said:
I humbly submit Fuglsang and Aru dropping everyone on a hellish >10% climb while having shown exactly nothing, zero all year.
And unlike Aru, Fuglsang has never shown this climbing level before.

Yes he has. At this very race he's even showed better climbing. When he first showed up.
If you're referring to the 2009 Dauphine, nah. He's clearly climbing at a higher level now. So far, anyway.
 

Singer01

BANNED
Nov 18, 2013
2,043
2
5,485
DanielSong39 said:
86TDFWinner said:
Nibali(who's since fallen off the face of the earth since his fluke TDF win)

You misspelled Wiggins.

Yep, nobody in cycling would like to have WCTT champion, hour record and olympic gold medal on their palmares.
 
May 3, 2015
4,833
4,404
21,180
Re:

fmk_RoI said:
A Tweet from a journalist with the Comic

Chris Marshall-Bell
@cmbell310

I never thought I'd see the day Ben Swift - a sprinter - came second on Alpe d'Huez. Bit tougher than @monsalhillclimb.

5:54 pm - 10 Jun 2017

Swift was never a pure sprinter and it was from a break. Wouldn't count that as too extraordinary.

Regarding Fuglsang, he finished 4th, 6th and 10th at Dauphine the years before and 3rd and 4th when riding Suisse. I have no doubt he will fade comes July and finish in his usual Top 20 range (lower end of Top 10 if all is going perfect for him).
 
Jul 10, 2009
918
0
0
Re:

portugal11 said:
Fulgsang at dauphine...
A lot of pressure from Vino? yes, where did fulsang come from? he looked strong, even at the end of race, he remined me of Landa at Astana after the Giro races, it was like nothing
 
Jul 15, 2016
2,152
192
6,680
If Fuglsang wins the Tour the forum would blow up for sure. It would surpass Wiggins for sure and maybe even Froome.
 
One word: Fuglesang...

Okay, maybe I have more to say than one word. If any performance over the past five years fit the OP perfectly it was Fuglesang and this years Dauphine. He looks like the best climber in the world at the moment, an attribute that has never ever been something associated with the Birdsong.

Astana strikes again, making a mockery of anti-doping efforts by putting a perennial also-ran into the Tour de France contender conversation. :eek:
 
Jul 15, 2016
2,152
192
6,680
Fuglsang hasn't won yet though. So far he's Iban Mayo 2.0 for all we know. If he smashes the Tour, that's a different story.

Aru, not even close since he's a GT winner and the hype machine has been persistent since at least 2014.
 
Jul 15, 2016
2,152
192
6,680
Also Talansky won the 2014 Dauphine and he didn't even register on the radar. Did nothing in the Tour that year and has only recently rounded back into decent form. Fuglsang was the shocker of the Dauphine but let's hold our horses for the time being.
 
Nov 7, 2010
8,820
246
17,880
Re:

DanielSong39 said:
Also Talansky won the 2014 Dauphine and he didn't even register on the radar. Did nothing in the Tour that year and has only recently rounded back into decent form. Fuglsang was the shocker of the Dauphine but let's hold our horses for the time being.
To be fair, Talansky only won because Contador was obsessed only with Froome and let him miles up the road before realising Froome wasn't bluffing. Fuglsang outclimbed everyone with ease.