• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Tour de France Motogate-Stage 14 of the 2023 Tour de France

I didn't say or imply anything. I just hate how people bring other situations into a discussion to justify another situation. So you can pretend or argue all you like, I'll comment on what I saw, which is a motard getting in the way of an attacking rider.
But it's the exact same problem, namely that moto bikes are too close to the riders.
 
But it's the exact same problem, namely that moto bikes are too close to the riders. But apparently sabotaging it one way is enough to start a heap of threads while for others it's just implicitly tolerated if it favors the right riders.
Not that it has anything to do with this, but fine, if you wish to go off-topic to drive home a non-existent point, I'll play. Name me any fan who tolerates motards in front of the riders and thereby influencing the outcome of a race.
 
He lost the sprint right afterwards. Are we really gonna pretend he would have dropped Vingegaard there?
I think that if you try to think a little bit about that sprint you’ll see Pogacar lost that sprint because he was ridiculously stupid and kept waiting and waiting and just after Vingegaard started the sprint and passes him they crossed the line.

Vingegaard won that sprint because he paid attention and Pogacar did not, not because he was physically supreme.
 
Absolutely, it is high time we rid of these morons. Should've been done after Charlet Reynard in 2015(?). Covid was a blessing in disguise.
Puy de Dome felt whack in my opinion. Soulless.

Rick: You seriously believe Pogacar got beat by Vingegaard on the top? It was a matter of Tadej forgetting, I think thats obvious to anyone bar you to drive some weird point home.
 
It's one of the most important Grand Tour traditions. A favourite must either crash out, withdraw, get barred, or blocked, have an ill-timed mechanical, a relegation or disqualification, an altercation with a fan, a contentious debate over upholding or not upholding unwritten rules, or something similar. Once it has happened, everything is OK with the world, because then it doesn't matter what happens or how negative racing becomes, the forum can entertain itself by arguing over what their favourite rider would have done if it hadn't been for it.
 
Sport without fans in attendance is like rock without guitars... if that's the solution, then count me out.

That being said, the difference in time, energy, effort and material spent on safeguarding between the climb and the descent of Joux-Plane is laughable. Surely having barriers along the road in the final kilometre of the climb is both easier to accomplish and more important than having audiovisual warnings for every last curve on the descent?
 
Sport without fans in attendance is like rock without guitars... if that's the solution, then count me out.

That being said, the difference in time, energy, effort and material spent on safeguarding between the climb and the descent of Joux-Plane is laughable. Surely having barriers along the road in the final kilometre of the climb is both easier to accomplish and more important than having audiovisual warnings for every last curve on the descent?
I agree, sports needs fans to add a special element of emotion to them. The organizers clearly overnighted the need for barriers on the top, but surely they should’ve known spectators would’ve shown out for a stage like this.