Mr X Revealed

Page 3 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Lexman said:
Yeah indeed if you take a look back at that list and delete everyone who was suspended in his career... not much left...
Goes to show that everyone who thinks that the "big fish" are never caught ultimately are completely wrong. I often think that the anti-doping work doesn't work at all, but looking at lists like that, it makes me realize that eventually, almost every doper is caught.
 
Merckx index said:
Yes, and insulin also increases muscle mass (helping recovery) by inhibiting breakdown of protein and by increasing uptake of amino acids into muscle cells. There have been some attempts to develop a test for insulin (like EPO, it’s a natural substance but doping involves a synthetic version that is slightly different) by detection of degradation products in the urine. Pantani used it apparently.

This link is rather old but still useful: http://velonews.competitor.com/2003/03/news/ask-the-doctor_3657

Thanks for that link. Very informative. I was curious about why someone would take it, and was thinking it was purely about glyogen replenishment.
 
42x16ss said:
There would have to be some kind of limit though, otherwise Team Type One would be dominating the WT...

Only in a clean peloton this would be an issue. And, they're fishing from a smaller gene pool which until a supertalent comes along, will prevent them from dominating.
But I agree, a limit should exist, but I can't offer a solution for that. Diabetics are free to shoot up as they please for all I know.
 
May 7, 2009
1,282
0
0
LaFlorecita said:
.... okay that comes out of nowhere. Where in this thread have I defended Alberto? Seems to me like you couldn't let this chance to take a dig at me slip.

Maybe you should look at your posts from the past year or so, or your signature for that matter, or jumping down a mod's throat for doing her job... that attitude may seem cute and harmless, but it's also part of what lets these guys get away with it.

Also, I didn't take a dig at YOU but rather YOUR BEHAVIOR
 
Mar 10, 2009
7,268
1
0
LaFlorecita said:
.... okay that comes out of nowhere. Where in this thread have I defended Alberto? Seems to me like you couldn't let this chance to take a dig at me slip.

Deagol said:
Maybe you should look at your posts from the past year or so, or your signature for that matter, or jumping down a mod's throat for doing her job... that attitude may seem cute and harmless, but it's also part of what lets these guys get away with it.

Also, I didn't take a dig at YOU but rather YOUR BEHAVIOR

And please let it rest here before we are a mile down in bickering again. Back on topic please. :)
 
hrotha said:
Well I was expecting something a bit more spectacular (a pro rider! That would have been interesting), but this'll do.

Why would a pro rider be more interesting? All of them that doped are liars, rode while doped, and many came out later to then admit usage?

They had no problem doping while riding professionally and making money. But now years later, they all become saints.

Pity...I would rely more on this guy's word that most cyclist.
 
zigmeister said:
Why would a pro rider be more interesting? All of them that doped are liars, rode while doped, and many came out later to then admit usage?

They had no problem doping while riding professionally and making money. But now years later, they all become saints.

Pity...I would rely more on this guy's word that most cyclist.
Who said anything about ex-riders? I was thinking of someone like De la Fuente, who had some weird things to say about Contador's positive back in 2010. Of course it's more interesting when the whistleblower is someone we already know and who normally we wouldn't expect to be it. That's basic storytelling.
 
hrotha said:
Who said anything about ex-riders? I was thinking of someone like De la Fuente, who had some weird things to say about Contador's positive back in 2010. Of course it's more interesting when the whistleblower is someone we already know and who normally we wouldn't expect to be it. That's basic storytelling.

What did he say?
 

Dr. Maserati

BANNED
Jun 19, 2009
13,250
1
0
maltiv said:
Goes to show that everyone who thinks that the "big fish" are never caught ultimately are completely wrong. I often think that the anti-doping work doesn't work at all, but looking at lists like that, it makes me realize that eventually, almost every doper is caught.

Sorry to rain on your parade but a quick look at the top 10 from that GC show 4 riders who have never even been sanctioned.

Add to that the reason we know most of that top 30 doped is through police investigations or admissions it actuallys says little about "anti doping" efforts.
 
Nov 26, 2010
82
0
0
gilbertador said:
This is rubbish you would have to get it spectacularly wrong to have this affect, trust me with this drug i know what im talking about, a single unit will have a proportionally larger effect than 2 units, so a small amount is all that is really unit and a single unit drops your blood sugar by 3% with any sugar at all say half a SIS shake this effect will be covered. What your saying is extremely unlikely and would take a significant amount of the drug. blood sugar down to 1.8 and your still conscious and able to sort it out.

I was just quoting the doctor that MI linked. To try and answer the question why not everybody is using insulin to cycle faster.
 
Jun 29, 2009
127
0
0
Red Rick said:
I know what insulin does, but how is it beneficial for a rider, i'd sooner think that glucagon would be beneficial.
Maybe he has secretly got diabetes

insulin is what carries glucose into the cell (it will also push amino acids into the cell if they are present in sufficiently large quantity)

insulin’s other major role is to then stimulate the cell to transform this glucose into glycogen (glycogen synthesis)

in the end, the equation is plain simple: the greater your reserves of glycogen, the longer you can ride before getting tired

in Victor Conte’s own words:

<<insulin is used after strenuous training sessions. 3 units immediately after the workout, administered together with intravenous glucose, proteins and creatine because insulin is a “shuttle” for glucose and amino acids to gain entry into the cells. The purpose of that is to replenish the glycogen, and to kick start protein synthesis. >>


also, giving insulin concurrently with nutrients “loads” the cell: it starts swelling like a balloon. its walls are stretched. the cell’s response to that is to increase the thickness of its walls so it can more comfortably accommodate a larger amount of content. now this actual thickening of the wall is stimulated by the mechano growth factor

but insulin has many other effects. several people in the thread were mentioning a synergy with anabolics and growth hormone.

CORTISOL (human body’s natural glucocorticoid)
--reduces cell’s responsivity to insulin (e.g. you can get diabetes as a side-effect of prolonged treatment with oral glucocorticoid tablets)

ANDROGENIC ANABOLICS STEROIDS
--they block the action of cortisol -> preserve cell’s responsivity to insulin -> help insulin do its job better, as it were
--problem with anabolic steroids: there is often a rapid loss of muscle “growth” upon stopping the anabolic treatment. One role of insulin in the body is to prevent the breakdown of protein (and even to synthesise protein if amino acids are present in sufficiently large quantity)-> insulin preserves the new “growth”

GROWTH HORMONE
--increases cell’s responsivity to insulin
--both growth hormone and insulin create a favorable anabolic environment in the cell in their own way -> 2 complementary ways to help the cell grow

(but hgh and insulin are totally opposed as far as lipid, and carbohydrate metabolism are concerned)

(example of the anabolic effects of insulin as a medication: type 2 diabetic patients with badly controlled glycemia and who are not on insulin lose weight. they regain it when they are put on insulin, but then they keep on gaining a little bit more additional weight with continued insulin treatment. that additional weight, a non-negligible portion of which is fat-free mass, is due to the anabolic effects of insulin)



Fetisoff said:
Hypoglycemia leads to an elevation in growth hormone, and insulin causes hypoglycemia. But as far as I know nobody dopes with just insulin, it's used together with roids or HGH

Growth hormone is a stress hormone, so there are a lot of things that lead to an elevation of it (exercise, fear, hunger...) and if it was just for the surge in growth hormone i can think of 1 million things to try before having to inject insulin.

but for a surge of growth hormone i would simply suggest to use growth hormone, really.

Hypoglycaemia is not always very safe to play with. And hypoglycaemia is not what people should be after when they inject insulin. Insulin should always be injected to non-diabetics with plenty of glucose (or glucose + protein + whatever else, as per Victor Conte’s technique above). This technique is called a hyperinsulinemic clamp and it is perfectly safe, it is routinely used in the pharmaceutical industry on new drugs in order to test if they interfere with insulin metabolism.

A typical clamp would be: constant-rate infusion of insulin for 2 hours at 1mu/kg/min + infusion of 20% dextrose at variable rate to maintain the target blood glucose level during these 2 hours. And you can even get a software to make all the calculations for you of how often and how fast you should run the dextrose. The more professional doping doctors will have access to this type of equipment or they will rent it as a one-off to get a baseline for their athlete(s).


Lanark said:
Apparently didn't stop Bjarne Riis in giving his riders insulin (by Jaksche's testimony).
Stefan Matschiner says in his book (page 81) that he always refused to give insulin to his clients, except in cycling, “and even then only after the hardest stages in 3-week long races”.
From the book i get the impression that in general he had concerns about the health risks to his athletes and, because insulin is cheap and easily available, he was scared that they might go buy some and inject it to themselves (he does tell about a few non-cycling clients who always tended to use more of everything than he had told them).

I guess Bjarne Riis is just as concerned for his riders but he has the “benefit” of the experience: he can come along and say “i’ve used insulin and this and that when i was a rider, i didn’t get any side effect from those, so don’t worry”. and probably his riders rely very much on him for that


Talking about Jaksche: he had his big confession just as Alberto Contador was becoming a grand tour winner and around that time german television asked him what he thought of Contador’s win(s) of the tour de France, and his reply was: “that’s some big cinema” (“großes Kino”). So we can also count Jaksche among those who don’t believe in Alberto Contador’s performance
 
Jun 29, 2009
127
0
0
6 international units of insulin given to someone who weighs 60kg increases their glucose uptake by 12
 
Equivalent bio-availability as ~35 ug of pure insulin.

Some insulin forms are long acting and slow release, others are closer to the pure peptide.

The IU is the standard way of referring to doseage for this drug.