National Football League

Page 393 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Alpe d'Huez said:
Congratulations to Rob Gronkowski on retiring at the right time. Plus, saving what appears to be his entire salary, living only off endorsements, and a fairly frugal lifestyle. His agent, Drew Rosenhaus, said don't be too shocked if he changes his mind, a la Jason Whitten. Or just comes back to fill in a roll later this season if the Pats need him. I don't know, he seemed pretty resolute to me.

The AAF rules may be having a small impact on the NFL. The rules committee just voted nearly unanimous, to have an alternative to the onsides kick. That is, if you don't want to try it, you can try a 4th and 15 from your own 35 yard line. Giants owner John Mara was the only one to vote against it, thinking it was like the Arena Football League. But the numbers show more players are hurt on kickoffs than any other play, so this is one step to eliminating the kickoff entirely.
on3m@n@rmy said:
As for numbers, it's odd they now post velocity for right and left arm...
I wondered that too at first, thinking it was the strangest thing. I mean, who throws a football well with their weak arm? How often do they? And how can some do so the same speed with both arms, when they only work on mechanics with the dominant arm? I knew that couldn't be right, so I looked into it. Both throws are with the dominant arm, it's the step and direction they are throwing the ball that they measure. The throws are to the left, and to the right.
Ohhhhhhh! Well, Sheet! Or Duh. Anyway, thanks for that bit of enlightenment.
_________
As for that AAF rule allowing a team the 4th & 15 try instead of the onside kick, it sounds a little bit like make-it take-it in gym rat hoops. :lol: It seems like the percentage of successful conversions vs attempts would be greater via the 4th & 15 method than would the traditional onside kick. One study (actually discussed in this thread quite some time ago, probably over a year/2 years ago?) showed the % success of a 4th & 15 to be about 19%. If that rate of success SEEMS greater than the % of successful onside kick recoveries, keep reading.

For example, a 4th down and 3 at the 50 yd line could be converted 56% of the time.
...that from http://advancedfootballanalytics.com/index.php/home/research/game-strategy/120-4th-down-study
Further, from that article, such a successful conversion (after starting with a 4th & 15 from the 35 yd line) would put the ball on at least the 50 yard line, which would result in 1.8 "expected points" (based on data from 2,400 NFL games from the 2000-2008 seasons). But expected points increases the closer to the endzone a team gets. So, lets say the 4th & 15 conversion nets a 30-yard gain, putting the ball on the defenses 35 yard line. The expected points from that ball spot would be close to 3 points. One could go through lots of mental gyrations over this.


The same analytics group did a study of onside kicks. http://archive.advancedfootballanalytics.com/2009/09/onside-kicks.html
The effect of surprise on the success of an onside kick is pretty big. The chart below plots success rate by WP. The less a team is expecting an onside kick, the more successful it is. When teams are expecting it, when WP is about 0.15 and below, the success rate is about 20%. But when teams aren’t expecting it, the success rate averages 60%. (There are 103 onside kicks classified as 'surprise' in the data, which results in a standard error of +/- 4.8%.)

So, maybe the 4th & 15 to go spotted at the 35 option is a really good alternative to the onside kick.

And then as to normal kickoffs, what it seems teams have done with the ball spotted at the 35 yardline is to kick the ball higher for the obvious reason, to give an offense poorer starting field position. And we know from stats that poorer the field position has lower success rates for scoring. Plus, it seems the number of runback attempts with the ball spotted at the 35 is just about equal to what it was when the ball was spotted at the 30. So, the NFL may actually have to eliminate kickoffs altogether. But I did not research the facts on this.
_________
Yup, good on Gronk. Hope he can find peace and passion for something else outside of playing the game.
 
Re:

Alpe d'Huez said:
Disappointed the Raiders signed Burfict. His career is also on the wanes, more than Matthews maybe, and he's a head case.
Wasn't too wild about it either, but it's a cheap, 1-year deal, and he knows Guenther's defense inside and out. And he's a significant upgrade to the Raiders horrible LB corps.

I do still worry about him in the locker room.
 
Alpe d'Huez said:
Congratulations to Rob Gronkowski on retiring at the right time. Plus, saving what appears to be his entire salary, living only off endorsements, and a fairly frugal lifestyle. His agent, Drew Rosenhaus, said don't be too shocked if he changes his mind, a la Jason Whitten. Or just comes back to fill in a roll later this season if the Pats need him. I don't know, he seemed pretty resolute to me.

The AAF rules may be having a small impact on the NFL. The rules committee just voted nearly unanimous, to have an alternative to the onsides kick. That is, if you don't want to try it, you can try a 4th and 15 from your own 35 yard line. Giants owner John Mara was the only one to vote against it, thinking it was like the Arena Football League. But the numbers show more players are hurt on kickoffs than any other play, so this is one step to eliminating the kickoff entirely.
on3m@n@rmy said:
As for numbers, it's odd they now post velocity for right and left arm...
I wondered that too at first, thinking it was the strangest thing. I mean, who throws a football well with their weak arm? How often do they? And how can some do so the same speed with both arms, when they only work on mechanics with the dominant arm? I knew that couldn't be right, so I looked into it. Both throws are with the dominant arm, it's the step and direction they are throwing the ball that they measure. The throws are to the left, and to the right.
I like the onside kick, it can add some excitement especially when a team has made a comeback. I guess that most of the kick return injuries are when small players meet immovable objects ! Like the hips, knees, helmets etc of much larger players. From an injury point of view it makes sense but I think the kicking in all facets of the game hase some value and some players are kick specialists either returning or kicking. Good kick returners are fun to watch.
 
movingtarget said:
Alpe d'Huez said:
Congratulations to Rob Gronkowski on retiring at the right time. Plus, saving what appears to be his entire salary, living only off endorsements, and a fairly frugal lifestyle. His agent, Drew Rosenhaus, said don't be too shocked if he changes his mind, a la Jason Whitten. Or just comes back to fill in a roll later this season if the Pats need him. I don't know, he seemed pretty resolute to me.

The AAF rules may be having a small impact on the NFL. The rules committee just voted nearly unanimous, to have an alternative to the onsides kick. That is, if you don't want to try it, you can try a 4th and 15 from your own 35 yard line. Giants owner John Mara was the only one to vote against it, thinking it was like the Arena Football League. But the numbers show more players are hurt on kickoffs than any other play, so this is one step to eliminating the kickoff entirely.
on3m@n@rmy said:
As for numbers, it's odd they now post velocity for right and left arm...
I wondered that too at first, thinking it was the strangest thing. I mean, who throws a football well with their weak arm? How often do they? And how can some do so the same speed with both arms, when they only work on mechanics with the dominant arm? I knew that couldn't be right, so I looked into it. Both throws are with the dominant arm, it's the step and direction they are throwing the ball that they measure. The throws are to the left, and to the right.
I like the onside kick, it can add some excitement especially when a team has made a comeback. I guess that most of the kick return injuries are when small players meet immovable objects ! Like the hips, knees, helmets etc of much larger players. From an injury point of view it makes sense but I think the kicking in all facets of the game hase some value and some players are kick specialists either returning or kicking. Good kick returners are fun to watch.

Well the new rules for kicks last year made the on-side kick almost impossible for the kicking team to recover.
 
I can't say I'm surprised, other than it was so sudden. Still, when they couldn't make payroll, and had one single person (Tom Dundon) basically bail the league out, the writing was really on the wall in hindsight. One person in near total control at that point. And when it appears the NFLPA wasn't interested in partnering with him, over what seems almost trivial - allowing practice squad players to play in the AAF - he pulled the plug. It seems in his eyes, this was the one single pipeline for having the AAF operate as a feeder league to the NFL, and that was key to their success.

What makes this more troubling is that Charlie Ebersol said the AAF had a financial system in place to allow the league to last several seasons, though he didn't point out what that was, or why. It lead me (and likely others) to think he had enough diverse backers who were willing to take a large loss leader, and plan for long-term, patiently. But apparently that was not the case, and never the case, hence the need to get Dundon's help.

Right now it appears the league is in suspension, not dead. But I'll be surprised if they come back. They in theory could broker some sort of deal, play another week, and have a championship and call it done. Or someone else could show up with some cash, I just don't see it.

To me this is really a shame, just another league that had good ideas, but was never on secure financial footing or any long term planning in this regard. It will be interesting to see what players show up in NFL camps from the AAF, also what lessons the XFL learns from the AAF. In theory they'll be in a better position, as Vince McMahon is a very savvy man, financially wise, and arguably the best promoter in the world. So we'll see...
 
San Diego news channels reporting that small AAF staff to remain for possible restructuring...? Blew in and out like the wind..we have too many half sports..major league soccer can't get stadium support..Clippers out,Chargers out..lacrosse..shaky.hockey is back after leaving.not sure this is a sports town..
Padres just spent some money but...the downtown shopping mall area that the stadium was built near is failed..
 
I did not think the AAF would have failed so soon, but reviewing the February 19 article below I guess I am not surprised either. I think what surprises me a little more is the NFL did not pitch in to help the AAF out financially, as the AAF could have become a legit developmental league. Maybe the owners were afraid the AAF might become a legit competitor to the NFL like the old USFL (remember Hershel Walker right out of college spurned the NFL and instead opted for the USFL's New Jersey Generals).
on3m@n@rmy said:
 
on3m@n@rmy said:
I did not think the AAF would have failed so soon, but reviewing the February 19 article below I guess I am not surprised either. I think what surprises me a little more is the NFL did not pitch in to help the AAF out financially, as the AAF could have become a legit developmental league. Maybe the owners were afraid the AAF might become a legit competitor to the NFL like the old USFL (remember Hershel Walker right out of college spurned the NFL and instead opted for the USFL's New Jersey Generals).
on3m@n@rmy said:
I agree.

Maybe the NFL is OK with their NCAA development league because they don't have to deal with it?
 
jmdirt said:
on3m@n@rmy said:
I did not think the AAF would have failed so soon, but reviewing the February 19 article below I guess I am not surprised either. I think what surprises me a little more is the NFL did not pitch in to help the AAF out financially, as the AAF could have become a legit developmental league. Maybe the owners were afraid the AAF might become a legit competitor to the NFL like the old USFL (remember Hershel Walker right out of college spurned the NFL and instead opted for the USFL's New Jersey Generals).
on3m@n@rmy said:
I agree.

Maybe the NFL is OK with their NCAA development league because they don't have to deal with it?
that is probly very true. & don't have to fund it, which really is not having to deal with it.

How short-sighted the NFL can be. I mean, I've felt for some time that there is someone at home sitting on the couch who could be playing in the NFL. All that some, even if a small portion, of those guys need after their college playing days are over is to strengthen their weaknesses, hone their skills, and get an opportunity. The AAF could have done that.

At least so far there is still the startup Pac-Pro Football league (PPFL) (http://www.pacificprofootball.com/league/principles/). From that website:
...is the first professional football league ever created to provide developing football players with a choice to play professionally directly from high school – a league where emerging players can hone their craft, play football, and be compensated for it.
edit: I should have added that the PPFL would never compete against the NFL in the marketplace (& I don't mean PPFL teams playing NFL teams, right. I mean the PPFL would never take away any of the NFL's market value or revenue.)
 
on3m@n@rmy said:
At least so far there is still the startup Pac-Pro Football league (PPFL) (http://www.pacificprofootball.com/league/principles/).
Add them to the list, along with the XFL, and Freedom Football League. I'll say what I did before, whomever starts a league is going to have to have a large supply of cash from a variety of sources, and those sources are going to need patience, and have to accept a very likely loss leader of more than one full season. If I were to start any league, I'd ask every single investor, "Can you handle us standing here in a year, knowing you're $10-20m in the red, and tell me you're still in it for the long run?"

I do agree though that almost any league that survives, would be very beneficial to have some sort of support from the NFL, whether that's financial backing, or some sort of integration of players.
jmdirt said:
Maybe the NFL is OK with their NCAA development league because they don't have to deal with it?
Bingo!

Of course, the NCAA has it's own share of problems. Plenty of them that people don't want to talk about. But it's already the feeder league into the NFL. One could also say that post-college, there are players in the CFL and Arena Football League that operate as a feeder to the NFL. They just have different rules. Quite different than the AAF even.
 
Alpe d'Huez said:
on3m@n@rmy said:
At least so far there is still the startup Pac-Pro Football league (PPFL) (http://www.pacificprofootball.com/league/principles/).
Add them to the list, along with the XFL, and Freedom Football League. I'll say what I did before, whomever starts a league is going to have to have a large supply of cash from a variety of sources, and those sources are going to need patience, and have to accept a very likely loss leader of more than one full season. If I were to start any league, I'd ask every single investor, "Can you handle us standing here in a year, knowing you're $10-20m in the red, and tell me you're still in it for the long run?"

I do agree though that almost any league that survives, would be very beneficial to have some sort of support from the NFL, whether that's financial backing, or some sort of integration of players.
jmdirt said:
Maybe the NFL is OK with their NCAA development league because they don't have to deal with it?
Bingo!

Of course, the NCAA has it's own share of problems. Plenty of them that people don't want to talk about. But it's already the feeder league into the NFL. One could also say that post-college, there are players in the CFL and Arena Football League that operate as a feeder to the NFL. They just have different rules. Quite different than the AAF even.
Good points all. As to the PPFL, I'm not sure how deep their pocket$ go. At least they have some compelling reasons to kick the PPFL into gear, which now should happen in 2020. Here is a podcast link well worth listening to, where John Clayton discusses the PPFL with founder Don Yee (Brady's agent). There are several points that made me say "yeah, but" (e.g. when Yee says recruiting players to the PPFL will be very competitive with NCAA college recruiting), then I recalled yeahbutts have long ears (bad joke). The one thing the PPFL has over the NCAA (so far) is players will earn an average salary, with benefits, of about $50,000 for a 2 month period of play (how deep are those pockets again?). It was very interesting to hear their philosophy for transitioning players to the NFL, even to the point of limiting blitzing to get more 1 on 1 matchups to evaluate OL blockers, and limiting no-huddle series to 1 no-huddle series per half to force QBs to learn more quickly how to make play calls instead of relying on calls from the sideline (as we see with many college no-huddle offenses). Anyway, here it is:
http://sports.mynorthwest.com/category/podcast_player/?a=e66a5d0f-1de7-4c86-aff9-a9fb0165e340&sid=1145&n=SCHOOLED+with+The+Professor
It sounds like the NFL will not be involved at this point in running the PPFL, but some NFL coaches and GMs are having some input on what they'd like the PPFL's purpose and focus to be.
 
If you listen to morning sports radio, what do you listen to? I have a radio preset for my commute because the afternoon is local sports. That same preset was Tiki and Tierney, then Mike and Mike, but now the DA Show. I like both of the previous shows (Tierney and Greeny less), but DA is horrible. I can't imagine that he has much of an audience so I keep hoping that he will go away, but until then...
 
Re:

jmdirt said:
If you listen to morning sports radio, what do you listen to? I have a radio preset for my commute because the afternoon is local sports. That same preset was Tiki and Tierney, then Mike and Mike, but now the DA Show. I like both of the previous shows (Tierney and Greeny less), but DA is horrible. I can't imagine that he has much of an audience so I keep hoping that he will go away, but until then...
I used to listen to Mike & Mike on the commute when I could, but got away from it the past couple years (vanpooling). I get most of my info from Twitter by following our local talk radio (710ESPN Seattle), and a couple other media guys (John Clayton, Ian Rapoport, & a couple teams). For instance, it was a 710ESPN tweet about Clayton's interview with Don Lee to discuss the Pac Pro Football league that led me to that podcast I posted earlier. You mentioned DA. I thought who the H is DA? So up to now I never listened to Damon Amendolara. I have to agree with you, it was awful. But I happened to pick a topic he discussed that hit close to home for me, that he and I are polar opposites on.
His take: https://cbssportsradio.radio.com/articles/da-aaf-reminds-us-what-were-missing-football
The hit he loved: https://twitter.com/TheAAF/status/1094413521490632704
Listening to his take you can figure out where I stand as the polar opposite.
 
That podcast by Damon Amendolara came out 2 months ago (Feb 11). So, yesterday, 2 months after DA's comments (indicating he is not concerned by players ending up with the CTE brain disease, which is why I'm a polar opposite to him), Boston University researchers are reported to be making big progress in detecting the Tau protein that is responsible for the CTE disease in LIVING human tissue by a process involving injecting a Tau-seeking tracer into a patient and using a PET scan to detect the Tau protein. Currently, CTE is only able to be determined by POSTMORTEM autopsy. Researchers say they are still about 5 years away for the method to be ready to be used for individual diagnosis in the clinic. Here are SOME of the researcher's findings:
The (PET) scans found that:

■ As a group, the former players had much more abnormal tau than the control group.

■ No one in the control group had levels of tau as high as those found among some of the players.

Those who played the most years of football had the highest levels of tau.

The scans provided an overall finding for the group but were less revealing when it came to individuals, limiting their utility as a diagnostic tool. Some of the former players had the same levels of tau as some people in the control group, for example.

And there was no correlation between the amount of tau and the severity of symptoms.

“That was a very interesting finding,” Sabbagh of the Cleveland Clinic said. “In other brain conditions, the amount of tau correlates well with symptoms.”
I'd summarize the two findings in red as follows:
- The longer a player plays football, the more Tau that player's brain will develop.
- A player cannot trust in symptoms as an indicator he (his brain) is in trouble. In other words, a player can have CTE without having symptoms.
Those bits of information should be concerning to players, all football institutions in general (youth thru pro), and the public.

This is also why I'm intolerant of comments by doofs like Amendolara who love seeing seeing a player's head "like it's not connected to his body anymore" (that's an exact quote), and that hits to the head (like the one posted above from the AAF that went viral) should be allowed in the NFL. BECAUSE that kind of hit is allowed in the AAF, the AAF deserved to die.

Links to the reseacher's findings:
https://www.nbcboston.com/news/health/Brain-Scans-May-Reveal-Concussion-Damage-in-Living-Athletes-508394621.html ...Good NBC video.

https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2019/04/10/boston-university-study-suggests-pathway-diagnosing-cte-living/d8CnSj32291dQCtLuRH6jJ/story.html?event=event25 ...and then hit "Continued Reading".
 
Even though I have always has sympathy/empathy for players with turf toe, I am reminded of the agony this week because my MPJ is **** angry as ****!

I can't imagine being a 325 pound guy exploding off of that toe or a speedster cutting off of that toe!
 
Re:

jmdirt said:
SEA and Wilson agree to 4 year $140 MIL (65 up front!) according to sources! :eek: I was actually thinking that they SEA had decided to move on, but holy *****!
Nice payday but when you see what Cousins and Jimmy G are getting it's not undeserved. How will it impact on the Hawks playoff chances re building their squad ? Maybe some trades on the way ? Some good draft picks will help.
 
Re: Re:

movingtarget said:
jmdirt said:
SEA and Wilson agree to 4 year $140 MIL (65 up front!) according to sources! :eek: I was actually thinking that they SEA had decided to move on, but holy *****!
Nice payday but when you see what Cousins and Jimmy G are getting it's not undeserved. How will it impact on the Hawks playoff chances re building their squad ? Maybe some trades on the way ? Some good draft picks will help.

Just more shows how insane some sports contracts in general are. However, the teams have the money to pay.
 
Re: Re:

Just watched an interview with Luck, and read another. If there's one thing they do have, is Vince McMahon is getting older, seems to really want the league to last. And he's worth over $3b, while it seems he's still going to look for external financial investment. This makes me think he could probably, probably eat upwards of $50m and keep going without blinking. Luck also seems to mentally understand and focus on finances, which is smart. I like the way Luck doesn't trash the AAF, and instead sees them as something to learn from.

Koronin said:
Just more shows how insane some sports contracts in general are. However, the teams have the money to pay.
Either that or the owner keeps it all. As I see it, the players are the ones doing the actual work. Though yes, the numbers are very high, no matter who is keeping it.

As to Rivers and Eli. Not sure what to say. I don't think Eli belongs in the hall, but being in NY, and his name, may get him there. Rivers, who knows. Crazy trade day though.
 
This "I told you so" is only aimed at Colin Cowherd, and some in the NYC media and blogosphere who said more than once he saw Russell Wilson heading to NYC, as his wife was from there, and it had all the big lights and all. I called BS on that, pretty loudly if I recall. Wilson himself addressed this recently saying it wasn't likely, and he wanted to play for Seattle. Some still called that a smokescreen.

If you missed it, Wilson just inked a deal with Seattle paying him $140m over four years, $107 of that guaranteed (what he wanted last contract, but didn't really get. This is where the real money is, obviously), and a no-trade clause. He seemed pretty happy about it, as did Ciara.

I'll save you the math, that's $35m a year, or $26.75 guaranteed.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000001026538/article/russell-wilson-seahawks-agree-to-4year-140m-deal
 

ASK THE COMMUNITY