National Football League

Page 333 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Dec 6, 2013
8,518
7,795
23,180
This is a great day! Great trails this morning, early football, too much food, afternoon football, evening football, and beer!

Troy was talking about the Viking's QB "situation": All three of their QBs would start for at least half of the other teams...half of the league doesn't have a QB who is better than the three at MIN! That's crazy! A few teams also have guys who are their franchise guy, but isn't as good as these three (ie: Rivers, Flacco, Bortles, and even Palmer, Luck (not sure he'll ever be the same) and Dalton).

That was a terrible last minute of the half for the MIN D!

HAPPY THANKSGIVING EVERYONE!
 
Aug 5, 2009
15,733
8,139
28,180
Re:

jmdirt said:
This is a great day! Great trails this morning, early football, too much food, afternoon football, evening football, and beer!

Troy was talking about the Viking's QB "situation": All three of their QBs would start for at least half of the other teams...half of the league doesn't have a QB who is better than the three at MIN! That's crazy! A few teams also have guys who are their franchise guy, but isn't as good as these three (ie: Rivers, Flacco, Bortles, and even Palmer, Luck (not sure he'll ever be the same) and Dalton).

That was a terrible last minute of the half for the MIN D!

HAPPY THANKSGIVING EVERYONE!

Funny how things turn out. This is a different Keenum to last year. QB position is not an issue and a lot of teams can't say that.
 
Jun 15, 2009
3,404
17
13,510
Re: Re:

movingtarget said:
jmdirt said:
This is a great day! Great trails this morning, early football, too much food, afternoon football, evening football, and beer!

Troy was talking about the Viking's QB "situation": All three of their QBs would start for at least half of the other teams...half of the league doesn't have a QB who is better than the three at MIN! That's crazy! A few teams also have guys who are their franchise guy, but isn't as good as these three (ie: Rivers, Flacco, Bortles, and even Palmer, Luck (not sure he'll ever be the same) and Dalton).

That was a terrible last minute of the half for the MIN D!

HAPPY THANKSGIVING EVERYONE!

Funny how things turn out. This is a different Keenum to last year. QB position is not an issue and a lot of teams can't say that.
One wonders how Keenum would have gone under McVay n Co...
 
Dec 6, 2013
8,518
7,795
23,180
Kind of funny, I put Rivers on my list of "lesser" QBs, and then he goes off for 400+ yards. He's inconsistent, erratic, and long in the tooth, but he can still lock in once in a while.

Keenum hasn't really ever been given a chance to succeed until this year (LA was just playing through last year). Its not like he had a huge transformation since last season. Actually, through 10 games this year his numbers are similar to his 10 games last year, but the glaring improvement is his TD/INT ratio ('16- 9/11, '17- 14/5), he also had five fumble last year to zero this year (that's 11 less TOs this year!). Obviously he isn't playing in a bubble, MIN is a better team than LA was last year plus they are planning/calling to his strengths. I know that "mathematically" there is no such thing as "momentum" in sports, but because things are rolling well for he and the team, good things happen.
 
Aug 5, 2009
15,733
8,139
28,180
Re:

jmdirt said:
Kind of funny, I put Rivers on my list of "lesser" QBs, and then he goes off for 400+ yards. He's inconsistent, erratic, and long in the tooth, but he can still lock in once in a while.

Keenum hasn't really ever been given a chance to succeed until this year (LA was just playing through last year). Its not like he had a huge transformation since last season. Actually, through 10 games this year his numbers are similar to his 10 games last year, but the glaring improvement is his TD/INT ratio ('16- 9/11, '17- 14/5), he also had five fumble last year to zero this year (that's 11 less TOs this year!). Obviously he isn't playing in a bubble, MIN is a better team than LA was last year plus they are planning/calling to his strengths. I know that "mathematically" there is no such thing as "momentum" in sports, but because things are rolling well for he and the team, good things happen.

Yeah Keenum looks more confident and McVey is usually good for QBs. As for Rivers, every so often he has a game like this one and everyone gets impressed again. As for the Cowboys, they look like a team that is tanking but they aren't. Their defense was terrible and Prescott was mediocre. The Cowboys have been given a 2% chance of making the playoffs. Not happening.
 
Re:

movingtarget said:
I suppose any little bit helps, but the action is a PR con job IMO. Eliminating full contact for regular season practices, when full contact during practice may only amount to about 15 minutes per week, and only on one day of the week. Players will love it though.
 
Jun 15, 2009
3,404
17
13,510
Re: Re:

movingtarget said:
Archibald said:
movingtarget said:
Of those last 4 teams, Rams (7-2) have hard schedule. They are at the Vikings (7-2), vs. Saints (7-2), at Cardinals (4-5), vs. Eagles (8-1), at Seahawks (6-3), at Titans (6-3), vs. 49ers (1-9). They could end up 9-7!

With easier schedule, Panthers (7-3) could make a run. They are at Jets (4-6), at Saints (7-2), vs. Vikings (7-2), vs. Packers (5-4), vs. Buccaneers (3-6), at Falcons (5-4). So could end up at 10-5 or 11-4.

Likewise, the 7-2 Saints could also make a push. Are vs. Redskins (4-5), at Rams (7-2), vs. Panthers (7-3), at Falcons (5-4), vs. Jets (4-6), vs. Falcons (5-4), at Buccaneers (3-6). At this point I like the Saints over Panthers.

Seattle (6-3) with relatively easier schedule than some, will be hard for them with all the players out wih injury or having to play nicked up. Too many to list, but they are lucky to still have CB Lane (failed physical at Houston in the trade for LT Duane Brown), lucky to get LT Brown, & lucky DE Dion Jordan is back in the absense of DE Cliff Avril. So Seattle are at Falcons (5-4), at 49ers (1-9), vs. Eagles (8-1), at Jaguars (6-3), vs. Rams (7-2), at Cowboys (5-4), vs. Cardinals (4-5). Seattle could win all but one of those and end up 12-4. But Seattle is a bit of an enigma and could lose all but one of those, ending up 7-9. S Earl Thomas could be back this week, but any more key injuries and they could easily end up 7-9.

Saints up last night, while the Rams got trounced. Seattle's chance to join them at 7-3 against Atlanta tonight?
Thought the Rams offence would have done better than that. Perhaps a good grounding for them not to get carried away with the recent hype? Not like their opponents have been A-grade... Keenum must be having a giggle...
Saints v Rams next week will be interesting, before they face the Panthers - get over those two and it's pretty much downhill from there for the Saints...

Vikings looking pretty good. The Chiefs are showing who they really are, God knows how they lost to the Giants. The Raiders and Cowboys are done for the season.
Chiefs just got downed by the Bills too...

Rams keep on rolling, as they accounted for the saints, and fairly well if I'm reading things right.
Hawks n Panthers still in it after both winning against poor opposition.
Next week's Saints/Panthers matchup will be interesting in the follow up to this...
I'd expect the Rams to handle the Cards without much trouble (despite the win over the Jaguars), while seahawks will likely get a pasting from the eagles, giving the rams more divisional advantage
 
Aug 5, 2009
15,733
8,139
28,180
Re: Re:

Archibald said:
movingtarget said:
Archibald said:
movingtarget said:
Of those last 4 teams, Rams (7-2) have hard schedule. They are at the Vikings (7-2), vs. Saints (7-2), at Cardinals (4-5), vs. Eagles (8-1), at Seahawks (6-3), at Titans (6-3), vs. 49ers (1-9). They could end up 9-7!

With easier schedule, Panthers (7-3) could make a run. They are at Jets (4-6), at Saints (7-2), vs. Vikings (7-2), vs. Packers (5-4), vs. Buccaneers (3-6), at Falcons (5-4). So could end up at 10-5 or 11-4.

Likewise, the 7-2 Saints could also make a push. Are vs. Redskins (4-5), at Rams (7-2), vs. Panthers (7-3), at Falcons (5-4), vs. Jets (4-6), vs. Falcons (5-4), at Buccaneers (3-6). At this point I like the Saints over Panthers.

Seattle (6-3) with relatively easier schedule than some, will be hard for them with all the players out wih injury or having to play nicked up. Too many to list, but they are lucky to still have CB Lane (failed physical at Houston in the trade for LT Duane Brown), lucky to get LT Brown, & lucky DE Dion Jordan is back in the absense of DE Cliff Avril. So Seattle are at Falcons (5-4), at 49ers (1-9), vs. Eagles (8-1), at Jaguars (6-3), vs. Rams (7-2), at Cowboys (5-4), vs. Cardinals (4-5). Seattle could win all but one of those and end up 12-4. But Seattle is a bit of an enigma and could lose all but one of those, ending up 7-9. S Earl Thomas could be back this week, but any more key injuries and they could easily end up 7-9.

Saints up last night, while the Rams got trounced. Seattle's chance to join them at 7-3 against Atlanta tonight?
Thought the Rams offence would have done better than that. Perhaps a good grounding for them not to get carried away with the recent hype? Not like their opponents have been A-grade... Keenum must be having a giggle...
Saints v Rams next week will be interesting, before they face the Panthers - get over those two and it's pretty much downhill from there for the Saints...

Vikings looking pretty good. The Chiefs are showing who they really are, God knows how they lost to the Giants. The Raiders and Cowboys are done for the season.
Chiefs just got downed by the Bills too...

Rams keep on rolling, as they accounted for the saints, and fairly well if I'm reading things right.
Hawks n Panthers still in it after both winning against poor opposition.
Next week's Saints/Panthers matchup will be interesting in the follow up to this...
I'd expect the Rams to handle the Cards without much trouble (despite the win over the Jaguars), while seahawks will likely get a pasting from the eagles, giving the rams more divisional advantage

McVey looks like a shoe in for the coach of the season. Panthers have surprised me and the Falcons are looking much better. Seahawks were none too convincing against the 49ers especially in the first half which doesn't look good for them leading into the playoffs but both teams have been decimated by injuries. If the Seahawks make the playoffs they might have some injured players back in time.
 
Jun 22, 2010
5,017
1,106
20,680
Re: Re:

movingtarget said:
Archibald said:
movingtarget said:
Archibald said:
movingtarget said:
Of those last 4 teams, Rams (7-2) have hard schedule. They are at the Vikings (7-2), vs. Saints (7-2), at Cardinals (4-5), vs. Eagles (8-1), at Seahawks (6-3), at Titans (6-3), vs. 49ers (1-9). They could end up 9-7!

With easier schedule, Panthers (7-3) could make a run. They are at Jets (4-6), at Saints (7-2), vs. Vikings (7-2), vs. Packers (5-4), vs. Buccaneers (3-6), at Falcons (5-4). So could end up at 10-5 or 11-4.

Likewise, the 7-2 Saints could also make a push. Are vs. Redskins (4-5), at Rams (7-2), vs. Panthers (7-3), at Falcons (5-4), vs. Jets (4-6), vs. Falcons (5-4), at Buccaneers (3-6). At this point I like the Saints over Panthers.

Seattle (6-3) with relatively easier schedule than some, will be hard for them with all the players out wih injury or having to play nicked up. Too many to list, but they are lucky to still have CB Lane (failed physical at Houston in the trade for LT Duane Brown), lucky to get LT Brown, & lucky DE Dion Jordan is back in the absense of DE Cliff Avril. So Seattle are at Falcons (5-4), at 49ers (1-9), vs. Eagles (8-1), at Jaguars (6-3), vs. Rams (7-2), at Cowboys (5-4), vs. Cardinals (4-5). Seattle could win all but one of those and end up 12-4. But Seattle is a bit of an enigma and could lose all but one of those, ending up 7-9. S Earl Thomas could be back this week, but any more key injuries and they could easily end up 7-9.

Saints up last night, while the Rams got trounced. Seattle's chance to join them at 7-3 against Atlanta tonight?
Thought the Rams offence would have done better than that. Perhaps a good grounding for them not to get carried away with the recent hype? Not like their opponents have been A-grade... Keenum must be having a giggle...
Saints v Rams next week will be interesting, before they face the Panthers - get over those two and it's pretty much downhill from there for the Saints...

Vikings looking pretty good. The Chiefs are showing who they really are, God knows how they lost to the Giants. The Raiders and Cowboys are done for the season.
Chiefs just got downed by the Bills too...

Rams keep on rolling, as they accounted for the saints, and fairly well if I'm reading things right.
Hawks n Panthers still in it after both winning against poor opposition.
Next week's Saints/Panthers matchup will be interesting in the follow up to this...
I'd expect the Rams to handle the Cards without much trouble (despite the win over the Jaguars), while seahawks will likely get a pasting from the eagles, giving the rams more divisional advantage

McVey looks like a shoe in for the coach of the season. Panthers have surprised me and the Falcons are looking much better. Seahawks were none too convincing against the 49ers especially in the first half which doesn't look good for them leading into the playoffs but both teams have been decimated by injuries. If the Seahawks make the playoffs they might have some injured players back in time.

Seahawks played better in this game than they did in the first meeting between the two teams in September, and that was when they were more healthy and fresh. I think they can draw some positives, even if it's against a one win 49er team. The next game against the Eagles will be their biggest test of the season. Actually it'll be Philly's biggest test of the season so far as well, because they haven't played many winning teams yet.
 
Re: Re:

BullsFan22 said:
movingtarget said:
Archibald said:
movingtarget said:
Archibald said:
Saints up last night, while the Rams got trounced. Seattle's chance to join them at 7-3 against Atlanta tonight?
Thought the Rams offence would have done better than that. Perhaps a good grounding for them not to get carried away with the recent hype? Not like their opponents have been A-grade... Keenum must be having a giggle...
Saints v Rams next week will be interesting, before they face the Panthers - get over those two and it's pretty much downhill from there for the Saints...
Vikings looking pretty good. The Chiefs are showing who they really are, God knows how they lost to the Giants. The Raiders and Cowboys are done for the season.
Chiefs just got downed by the Bills too...

Rams keep on rolling, as they accounted for the saints, and fairly well if I'm reading things right.
Hawks n Panthers still in it after both winning against poor opposition.
Next week's Saints/Panthers matchup will be interesting in the follow up to this...
I'd expect the Rams to handle the Cards without much trouble (despite the win over the Jaguars), while seahawks will likely get a pasting from the eagles, giving the rams more divisional advantage

McVey looks like a shoe in for the coach of the season. Panthers have surprised me and the Falcons are looking much better. Seahawks were none too convincing against the 49ers especially in the first half which doesn't look good for them leading into the playoffs but both teams have been decimated by injuries. If the Seahawks make the playoffs they might have some injured players back in time.

Seahawks played better in this game than they did in the first meeting between the two teams in September, and that was when they were more healthy and fresh. I think they can draw some positives, even if it's against a one win 49er team. The next game against the Eagles will be their biggest test of the season. Actually it'll be Philly's biggest test of the season so far as well, because they haven't played many winning teams yet.
Two positives I can think of are:
1) defense is playing okay (despite missing 3 of 4 starting DBs, of whom Sherman and Chancellor are out for the season). The front 7 are playing lights out. Dion Jordan made Dwight Freeney expendable (cut). And if there is a MLB in the league playing better than Bobby Wagner I'd like to know.
2) Tinkering with starters on the offensive line has appeared to settled down (FINALLY at 10 games into the season) now that LG Joekel is back and LT Dwayne Brown's injury was minor. Brown by the way is also playing lights out. Last week was the first time all 5 of these starters (LT-Brown, LG-Joekel, C-Britt, RG-Posic, RT-Ifedi) have played a whole game together at those positions. So they will get better, but so will every other OL unit of their opponents. OC Bevell is getting creative using heavy sets, running left more (Brown's side), passing out of heavy sets, and finally finding ways to get Jimmy Graham more involved in the passing game.
Trouble is, defensively for Seattle, who did SF have to test the Seattle backup secondary, and it will be a different story when the Eagles and Wentz come to town.
 
movingtarget said:
Nomad said:
Big brawl at the Broncos - Raiders game. Crabtree vs Talib...who would have thought. Lol.

https://youtu.be/Kv0BNG0RDgk

Oh well no surprise. Clowns.
Right, there are always a few. And for quite some time. When asked about the altercation on Cowherd, Terry Bradshaw brought up an incident that occurred when he played with the Steelers in the 70's. He said, Mean Joe Green removed his helmet during a game and used it as a club, taking on the entire offensive line of the Steelers opponents. He probably got a 15-yd PF. Usually linemen don't get into it like that, but then they also don't do near as much trash talking as WRs and DBs do.

I'd like to know what Marshawn Lynch told Talib on the sideline when Talib was exiting the field. It looked like Lynch was being a good sport about it.
 
Apr 20, 2016
778
2,726
15,680
Wow!...a "Manning" benched for performance? I don't think Archie or Peyton were ever benched for performance issues during their careers.

What about that stiff over at KC? Are they ever going to bench him in favor of the young buck and 10th OA pick, Patrick Mahomes? KC is melting down losing 5 out of it's last 6 six games and looked dreadful offensively against the Bills last week. And guess what? Smith throws a crucial pick past midfield on their last possession late in the 4th quarter where they needed just a TD to tie the game. I'm going to LMAO if KC doesn't win the division or make a WC and Reid still insists that Smith is "their guy" for next year.
 
Aug 5, 2009
15,733
8,139
28,180
Nomad said:
Wow!...a "Manning" benched for performance? I don't think Archie or Peyton were ever benched for performance issues during their careers.

What about that stiff over at KC? Are they ever going to bench him in favor of the young buck and 10th OA pick, Patrick Mahomes? KC is melting down losing 5 out of it's last 6 six games and looked dreadful offensively against the Bills last week. And guess what? Smith throws a crucial pick at midfield on their last possession late in the 4th quarter where they needed just a TD to tie the game. I'm going to LMAO if KC doesn't win the division or make a WC and Reid still insists that Smith is "their guy" for next year.

Kansas seem to be melting down. Surely they have to try Mahomes this week.
 
Aug 5, 2009
15,733
8,139
28,180
Re: Re:

on3m@n@rmy said:
BullsFan22 said:
movingtarget said:
movingtarget said:
Archibald said:
Saints up last night, while the Rams got trounced. Seattle's chance to join them at 7-3 against Atlanta tonight?
Thought the Rams offence would have done better than that. Perhaps a good grounding for them not to get carried away with the recent hype? Not like their opponents have been A-grade... Keenum must be having a giggle...
Saints v Rams next week will be interesting, before they face the Panthers - get over those two and it's pretty much downhill from there for the Saints...
Vikings looking pretty good. The Chiefs are showing who they really are, God knows how they lost to the Giants. The Raiders and Cowboys are done for the season.
Chiefs just got downed by the Bills too...
McVey looks like a shoe in for the coach of the season. Panthers have surprised me and the Falcons are looking much better. Seahawks were none too convincing against the 49ers especially in the first half which doesn't look good for them leading into the playoffs but both teams have been decimated by injuries. If the Seahawks make the playoffs they might have some injured players back in time.

Seahawks played better in this game than they did in the first meeting between the two teams in September, and that was when they were more healthy and fresh. I think they can draw some positives, even if it's against a one win 49er team. The next game against the Eagles will be their biggest test of the season. Actually it'll be Philly's biggest test of the season so far as well, because they haven't played many winning teams yet.
Two positives I can think of are:
1) defense is playing okay (despite missing 3 of 4 starting DBs, of whom Sherman and Chancellor are out for the season). The front 7 are playing lights out. Dion Jordan made Dwight Freeney expendable (cut). And if there is a MLB in the league playing better than Bobby Wagner I'd like to know.
2) Tinkering with starters on the offensive line has appeared to settled down (FINALLY at 10 games into the season) now that LG Joekel is back and LT Dwayne Brown's injury was minor. Brown by the way is also playing lights out. Last week was the first time all 5 of these starters (LT-Brown, LG-Joekel, C-Britt, RG-Posic, RT-Ifedi) have played a whole game together at those positions. So they will get better, but so will every other OL unit of their opponents. OC Bevell is getting creative using heavy sets, running left more (Brown's side), passing out of heavy sets, and finally finding ways to get Jimmy Graham more involved in the passing game.
Trouble is, defensively for Seattle, who did SF have to test the Seattle backup secondary, and it will be a different story when the Eagles and Wentz come to town.


The 49ers are playing a rookie QB and were without their two best corners, their best receiver, their best O Line player, their best tight end and they have some injuries on defense and Bowman went to the Raiders. Seattle will take the win but the real test will be with the Eagles of course.
 
Dec 6, 2013
8,518
7,795
23,180
Nomad said:
Wow!...a "Manning" benched for performance? I don't think Archie or Peyton were ever benched for performance issues during their careers.

What about that stiff over at KC? Are they ever going to bench him in favor of the young buck and 10th OA pick, Patrick Mahomes? KC is melting down losing 5 out of it's last 6 six games and looked dreadful offensively against the Bills last week. And guess what? Smith throws a crucial pick past midfield on their last possession late in the 4th quarter where they needed just a TD to tie the game. I'm going to LMAO if KC doesn't win the division or make a WC and Reid still insists that Smith is "their guy" for next year.
IMO KC imploded. Some of it is on Smith, but there is plenty of blame to go around, starting wit the coaching staff and working out from there. IMO the receivers are ruining soft routes which doesn't help AS, and the D seems to be playing prevent for 58 minutes. They are still leading their division so a QB change doesn't look likely, but if they are floundering in their next game it doesn't seem like it could hurt to put the gun-slinger in to fire things up. If they change QBs and still run the same plays, they will still struggle.
 
Jul 27, 2010
5,121
884
19,680
Nomad said:
Wow!...a "Manning" benched for performance? I don't think Archie or Peyton were ever benched for performance issues during their careers.

Big bro was benched for most of the last half dozen games in his final season. The initial reason, and ongoing official explanation, was for a plantar problem, but as time went on, it became more and more obvious that his performance, or lack of, also contributed. He returned to practice eventually and still did not start. When he was finally activated for the final game of the RS, it was as a backup--a first in his pro career--and he didn't get in the game until the second half. Don't forget that during this period there was a lot of speculation that he might not start the SB, if the Broncos got that far. His performance that year was quite a bit worse than Eli's has been this year.

Quote of the week: "Three quarters of the NFC South is better than 7/8 of the AFC."
 
Merckx index said:
Nomad said:
Wow!...a "Manning" benched for performance? I don't think Archie or Peyton were ever benched for performance issues during their careers.

Big bro was benched for most of the last half dozen games in his final season. The initial reason, and ongoing official explanation, was for a plantar problem, but as time went on, it became more and more obvious that his performance, or lack of, also contributed. He returned to practice eventually and still did not start. When he was finally activated for the final game of the RS, it was as a backup--a first in his pro career--and he didn't get in the game until the second half. Don't forget that during this period there was a lot of speculation that he might not start the SB, if the Broncos got that far. His performance that year was quite a bit worse than Eli's has been this year.

Quote of the week: "Three quarters of the NFC South is better than 7/8 of the AFC."
Man, opinions are all over the charts on this from fully supporting Eli to it's about time. OFC former coach Tom Coughlin supports Eli and thinks it is a terrible move. Former player and HOFer Tony Gonzalez also supports Eli saying he's been dissed, has all this experience and 2 SB rings, etc. I don't buy all that. I go with what Colin Cowherd said, that the Giants have every right to try something new since they are not going anywhere in the playoffs and need to see what Gino Smith can do; that way giving them an idea what they need to do in the draft (where they will have the #3 overall pick - at this moment) about drafting a QB or not (when they will likely have a number of teams willing to trade up to get one of the top 3 QBs).
 
May 17, 2013
7,559
2,414
20,680
jmdirt said:
Nomad said:
Wow!...a "Manning" benched for performance? I don't think Archie or Peyton were ever benched for performance issues during their careers.

What about that stiff over at KC? Are they ever going to bench him in favor of the young buck and 10th OA pick, Patrick Mahomes? KC is melting down losing 5 out of it's last 6 six games and looked dreadful offensively against the Bills last week. And guess what? Smith throws a crucial pick past midfield on their last possession late in the 4th quarter where they needed just a TD to tie the game. I'm going to LMAO if KC doesn't win the division or make a WC and Reid still insists that Smith is "their guy" for next year.
IMO KC imploded. Some of it is on Smith, but there is plenty of blame to go around, starting wit the coaching staff and working out from there. IMO the receivers are ruining soft routes which doesn't help AS, and the D seems to be playing prevent for 58 minutes. They are still leading their division so a QB change doesn't look likely, but if they are floundering in their next game it doesn't seem like it could hurt to put the gun-slinger in to fire things up. If they change QBs and still run the same plays, they will still struggle.
True. I believe in Mahomes, but I don't think that he is the solution right now. Unless you go no-huddle, use his college scheme effectively...Hill can outrun anyone...but he needs time to throw and the O-line sucks. Sucks. The gimmicks don't work anymore. Alex lost his cool, makes mistakes. And the defense lost many pieces, or loses players every other week (Berry -huge- Ford, Ali, even JH) that the offense doesn't tire the opponent's defense and get them late. Time of possession. Still, the Chiefs have enough to win the west. Not enough to win a playoff game in Pittsburg or in Foxboro. Maybe that's when you get Pat Mahomes in the 4th quarter and throw it all over. He's good, great..biggest ceiling of all the young QBs. The Gruden piece on YouTube shows it, pre-season showed it, heck, if a guy can throw 60 yards on his knees, nobody's safe...
 
Mar 11, 2009
10,526
3,558
28,180
Haven't posted in a while. Some thoughts.

In the NFL no one deserves much respect simply for longevity. Just because your last name is Manning may mean a lot to some people, but now when your team is 2-9 it doesn't mean squat. By the numbers, Eli is 24th in QBR, and 15th in passer rating. That puts him on par with Jacoby Brissette. Having said that, it wouldn't shock me to see Eli back starting in a week or two, or in Jacksonville next year, as a transition QB.

As to the Chiefs, I've seen most of their games, and the biggest mistake they have made in my eyes is that they are no longer throwing the ball down the field with any consistency. On many 3rd and long plays, or even 2nd and long plays, instead of doing what worked so well for the first few games in the season, they have gone back to doing things like quick slants, and short WR screens that are almost laterals, even a wildcat on one play. And they're not rolling him out, or moving the pocket much anymore either. Even Tony Dungee said similar, that what they really need to do is put the ball in Alex Smith's hands. If he fails at that, then he really is done in KC. But he wasn't the one who gave up on plays last week.

Historically young QB's don't lead their teams deep in the playoffs. There are exceptions. Marino, Montana, Brady and Roethlesberger. But these QBs are often on veteran teams with an established coach. As powerful as the Eagles look now, can Carson Wentz and Doug Pederson take them all the way?

What happens in Minnesota if, or when, they are in a tight, important game, and Case Keenum blows it, or can't deliver? What happens if they get to the playoffs, and he barely wins a game and looks iffy doing so? As good of a story Bridgewater is, he was still on the rise with room to improve when he got hurt. He's not quite as good (yet) as people remember. But Bradford is on IR and out for the remainder of the regular season. I don't think any coach would bring him back, first game, in the playoffs as a starter.

Are the Chargers for real? I think so. Rivers by the numbers isn't doing great, but he's made some clutch throws, plays and drives this year. That would be something to see a playoff game in lowly Stub Hub stadium, with some 27,000 people crammed in there.

The Patriots keep on winning while no one notices. But their defense still gives up way too many yards. Can the Steelers, or someone else upend them? Maybe, if their defense is enough to at least slow down Brady and co. or in key drives.

Despite the loss to LA and a close win over Washington I still believe in New Orleans. They have the best YPP in the NFL, by far. A number that has actually increased in recent weeks. Upcoming games against Carolina and Atlanta should be fun to watch.

Atlanta is playing very well, and 2nd in YPP, with a decent defense. But they play Minnesota, Carolina, Tampa, and the Saints twice. An acid test for sure.
 

Latest posts