JayZee said:
The big teams will come. Maybe not their A squads, but the U.S. (at least for the time being) is just too big of a market to ignore.
Except for those teams for whom it's irrelevant - Caisse, Katyusha, Euskaltel, FdJ, Lotto, Lampre, what reason do those teams have for racing in the US?
Coming to the US will be pretty much the same squads as raced Cali. Again, the US-based teams and teams with sponsors with US interests (Rabo, QS) might send some A-ish squads, but you'll be missing half the ProTour, the Vuelta will continue to be far more prestigious for any serious stage racers and Worlds prep, but a few top names will come to the US to roll around just like the Tour of California, where they tried to sell us something they were never going to be able to give us (it was so prestigious that great climbers rolled in with the autobus and over 100 riders pulled out). The rest of the roster will be filled with US domestic teams, and it will be a good race - better racing than Cali - but it's not going to displace the Vuelta in a month of Sundays.
It may well benefit from being close to the Canadian ProTour races, if they don't fail. As a result you'll have a fair few PT teams in North America already, and it makes sense to get the races done together, just like Qatar and Oman. But again, I don't expect the crême de la crême to come because the Vuelta is more prestigious and seen as better Worlds prep.
Weirdly though, I think that that will help the race rather than hinder it. It's much better to build the prestige of a race up from below than to superimpose imagined prestige and top names over a race without the history or tradition like in Cali. The loss of Lance and Levi may expose how little most of the péloton cares about it, while having fewer big names but a good race status could mean better racing and harder fought wins, which will then make them seem like they mean more.