yeah, probably. Nice catch.gregrowlerson said:Armstrong vs. Ullrich, alp 'duez '01?
yeah, probably. Nice catch.gregrowlerson said:Armstrong vs. Ullrich, alp 'duez '01?
Eshnar said:when is the last time anyone of them gained two minutes on their strongest opponent in a single climb?
edit> when is the last time anybody at all did it.
icefire said:Sastre. Alpe d'Huez 2008.
well, they let him go... but you're right. Totally forgot about that.icefire said:Sastre. Alpe d'Huez 2008.
Eshnar said:when is the last time anyone of them gained two minutes on their strongest opponent in a single climb?
edit> when is the last time anybody at all did it.
whittashau said:""My condition's been very good, but I've never looked to push right to the end, I think that you can see this from my face," Nibali said. "When I get to the finish, I've never given everything because there hasn't been the need. You need to think of the following day's stage, where you never know when you could have a crisis or something. So I've never had to push too much.""
Telling quote, and if indeed true it makes a lot of the arguments in this thread defunct
alin.constantin89 said:he's a very calculated man.
whittashau said:""My condition's been very good, but I've never looked to push right to the end, I think that you can see this from my face," Nibali said. "When I get to the finish, I've never given everything because there hasn't been the need. You need to think of the following day's stage, where you never know when you could have a crisis or something. So I've never had to push too much.""
Telling quote, and if indeed true it makes a lot of the arguments in this thread defunct
Cookster15 said:Spot on. Its about time the doubters acknowledged Nibali is the worthy champion with or without AC and Froome.
Publicus said:The last part is just trying to stir the pot. He's a worthy champion, full stop. Just as we can't know whether Froome or AC could have recouped the time they lost before they both exited the race, we also can't know that they wouldn't have buried Nibali in the later stages.
whittashau said:""My condition's been very good, but I've never looked to push right to the end, I think that you can see this from my face," Nibali said. "When I get to the finish, I've never given everything because there hasn't been the need. You need to think of the following day's stage, where you never know when you could have a crisis or something. So I've never had to push too much.""
Telling quote, and if indeed true it makes a lot of the arguments in this thread defunct
SeriousSam said:With all the (deserved) questions about CONTADOR AND FROOME he's been getting, I think he now feels the need to pretend that he isn't even trying hard when, clearly, he's been on the limit a few times. He was close to cracking when Pinot put in that devastating acceleration and has repeatedly been unable to shake noted elite climber Peraud.
Very smart riding though, and certainly a worthy winner amongst those that still compete for the Tour.
whittashau said:If everything he has been saying are lies he's by far one of the most committed actors in cycling history.
whittashau said:If everything he has been saying are lies he's by far one of the most committed actors in cycling history. Because that means he deliberately in a split second decided to take a bottle to cover up his bonk, and he's deliberately gone to great lengths to make it look like he wasn't breathing hard on multiple uphill finishes.
rzombie1988 said:Tier 2
Quintana
Evans
Nibali
Wiggins
Afrank said:Evans and Wiggins don't deserve to be anywhere near Quintana and Nibali. Evans and Wiggins are in decline and Quintana and Nibali on the rise and head and shoulders above.
rzombie1988 said:These are mostly opinion, so who knows.
We don't know about Wiggins. It's impossible to say about him since he hasn't done any GT's. I don't really count the 2013 Giro because it was obvious he did not want to be there. If he had been in this race though, he would have been an instant favorite and may have been able to pull it off with Porte.
Evans is on his way down for sure and I'm not a big fan of his, but I do think he would have made the most out of the situation in this tour and certainly wouldn't have lost that much on the cobbles.
For sure Quintana is on his way up but I don't see him quite up to Froome/AC's level yet. The Giro he won didn't have a great field and he did get owned by Froome in last year's Tour.
As I said, I can't put Nibali up there with Froome and Contador. He got sandblasted and destroyed in the 2012 Giro by AC and last year he was still 3 minutes down on Froome. He was also 7 minutes down on Contador at the 09 Tour. He's never beaten either 1 on 1 in a GT.
Uran still hasn't won a GT. There's no way he wins at the Vuelta if he competes, and I wouldn't favor him over Nibali at this point, who I assumed would be his main Giro 2015 competitor. I guess the Vuelta 2015 is a possibility, but that's a long way off.lenric said:Evans would be 15 minutes down at least so far. He wasn't capable of handling Rolland or even Majka 2 months ago. So no, it's not an opinion, it's a fact.
Wiggins may be or may not be declining, but he's nowhere near Quintana nor Nibali. And since this year's tour only has 1 TT, he wouldn't be able to gain the time lost to them in the mountain stages.
And I can't understand how Evans may be placed above Uran, when Uran was 2nd in this year's Giro...
From those you guys you named, Sanchez and maybe (big maybe, because of the TT) Schleck are the ones who may be at the same level of Evans, everybody else is just superior.
whittashau said:From his list it's clear he didn't watch the Giro
Mentioning Schleck and Sanchez, but not Aru or Kelderman. And how is Evans second tier? Even if you didn't watch cycling this year he got crushed by Nibali in the Giro last year as well.