Re: Re:
Ah right. I wasn't really referring to the Bouhanni incident - just asking a more general question. I'd be surprised if Nibali was getting towed that long because the TV was more focused on his chase (which we saw a lot of) than they were with what was going on up front. I suppose Astana were watching the camera bike as well as the race officialsEscarabajo said:That was the difference. In one there was a clear blatant acceleration. In the other, well, we are not sure.Eyeballs Out said:Escarabajo said:LOL.Eyeballs Out said:I don't see why there is a distinction between hanging onto a car for 10 secs+ and hanging onto a bottle for 10 secs+. Same practical advantage
But anyway, was there any evidence Nibali was hanging onto the car ? From the video that was posted it was impossible to say, only that he was clearly hanging on to something
The difference is about 20-40 mph. That's all.
?
If I hang on to a car doing 40 mph how fast am I going?
If I hang on to a bottle in a car doing 40 mph how fast am I going ?
In the first one you might say we did not see he was doing it with a bottle, but at that speed I bet he was hanging onto the car, otherwise he would be risking a major crash at that speed. Big difference. That's why it was inferred that he was holding onto a car. Besides they can ask the other riders who were standing behind and watching in shock.
I thought about the mechanics the first time that I saw it and then I drew my conclusion that He put his head down and hung onto the car. There was just too much speed. For how long? don't know but it was enough time on television to merit expulsion anyway. I bet it went for a lot longer than what he said. 150 m? no way.