MustIski said:
Shame that Lähteenmäki was sick during the earlier days of Tour. She could have definitely competed for a place at the podium if she would have been fit. Kyllönen is having a really good breaktrough season. Too bad that her skis weren't too good today.
Ah thanks for that information. I agree, had she been fit going into the tour I also think she would have placed higher. She is one to watch for the future.
What?! A Finn with bad classics skis?! The Finns seem to have had really good skis in classic these last few seasons so just one skier getting it wrong is not bad at all.
python said:
when analyzing elite race results, i often value post-race comments of the participants themselves above what my own eyes saw…it appears there were 2 reasons for petter’s difficulty: sprinting too early in the race and poor grip wax. At least that’s what the Canadians think…their chief coach justin wadsworth said that the 1st the preem ended petter‘s race. it was too close to the start and too hard, so he instructed his guys to avoid it…also, kershaw noticed that northug did not seem to have the grip running on the outside of the track.
Yep seeing something and understanding what you are seeing depends a lot of what you know about what you are seeing. And the experts tend to see things differently than us amateurs.
But in this case I'm not so sure.
Northug usually prefers glide over grip. He prefers to advance in areas were it costs less energy, meaning downhill and the flats. So going up hill one should expect it to look like he might have a bad grip at times.
The observations I have been able to gather is Thomas Alsgaard saying something about Northug perhaps not being able to put in top performances 3 days in a row as he said could be seen in Kuusamo. I remember Northug struggling in that race, but I assumed it was more to do with being out in front alone for the hole race and being chased by the pack in difficult snow conditions. Could be Alsgaard is right, could be I am right, or it could be a bit of both.
Northug said he felt he did not have a good day when the race started and felt he had to take the early bonus points. He might be telling the truth or he might not. I'm not sure going all out for the bonus at first oppurtunity is a good tactic if your having a bad day, so I think I'll take that statement with a huge grain of salt. (I have never ever heard him complain about waxing in a post race interview. This is information that becomes available much later via third parties or an evaluation or something.)
Therese Johaug answered that they did not have the best skis in the classic race when asked a leading question in interviews after the alpe cermis climb the day after. She added that in a tour one has good skis some days and not so good skis other days. Hence careful to not put any blame on the waxers.
One observation supporting a generally bad Norwegian glide in that race both for the boys and the girls was Heidi Wengs race. In the gliding part of the course it was easy to see she had a bad glide. IMHO she is not strong enough in double polling yeat to be able to camouflage bad glide, and her experience in testing and having the right skis is less than the older girls. This I think is due to her being young and new on the team and not having had so much time to build up experience in choosing good skis for her, and the right balance in regards to grip vs. glide for her.
So my theory is that Northug started the race as planned, he might not have felt super, but he might not have felt that bad either. He proceeds as planned and takes the first bonus. His grip is as planned, meaning perhaps a little worse than his competitors. But when he goes down hill and on the flat he finds he is not able to advance as usual. He tries hard on the first round, but after that he starts to limit his losses.
So why did this happen? I think it's a mix of issues. I think the bad glide really exposed him badly, and he did not have the strength to compensate.
But I could be wrong. I think they evaluate the ski performance after the tour, so we might hear something about what happened in a few weeks time. Usually one of the NRK commentators mentions these things in passing during one of the races in january.
So my guess is bad glide+bad day for Northug.
python said:
Today’s climb may bring some surprises. I doubt bauer will keep up with his record on the climb but one of the canadians (babikov!?) may do very well…I also think hellner can deliver a special performance today. as I analyzed a couple of days ago, northug without a comfortable cushion of bonuses was unlikely to win the gc…and so it look to happen.
the topography of the climb (flat for 6.5km out of the total 9km) and the strength of numbers in terms of team tactic/drafting/standings, favor one of the Russians today. i agree, legkov is the most logical choice having shown a consistent climbing strength during the past 2 days (1st to the top in the 5km classic and lively yesterday in the intermidiate sprints).
cologna ? if I recall correctly, lost to legkov almost 1.5 minute last year on the very mountain. so his chances seem to line up with 2nd on the GC.
we shall see in 2 hours
And right you were!
But Dario wasn't that much worse than Legkov in the end so I think the situation in the race is essential in evaluating the climbling performance.