I would hate to go into the final shoot knowing I could go to the penalty loop and still win. That is some f'ed up pressure.
Take that to the clinic please.Diggins racing like she's possessed by the spirit of Mühlegg.
Yeah, it's more about the technique combined with the dominance, but I get your point.Take that to the clinic please.
I was not able to watch the race live and came back to chaos...either the whole Swedish team came down with COVID or that was an epic waxing disaster. Ouch.If Carl started early before the snowfall got stronger and had found someone on the way (like Heidi Weng did with Dolci) she could have been fighting for the win.
Overall it looks like the Swedish service team made some mistakes.
Wildly, she's actually more aesthetic to watch in classic nowadaysDiggins racing like she's possessed by the spirit of Mühlegg.
Karlsson's technique was already breaking down at the first time check, she clearly isn't back at 100% yet.I was not able to watch the race live and came back to chaos...either the whole Swedish team came down with COVID or that was an epic waxing disaster. Ouch.
I think the skis were ok as long as there was enough skiers around to keep the course ”clean”. Andersson lost most time the last lap.Karlsson's technique was already breaking down at the first time check, she clearly isn't back at 100% yet.
Andersson suddenly loosing more and more time after being up there at the start was a bigger surprise. Clearly more snowfall and bad skis didn't help either.
Appreciate that, thanks. Yeah, Muehleggs technique would have given any windmill a run for its money but that's not the first thing I think of when I hear that name. The reference just drags up some ugly imagery; he'd have made Bjarne Riis ashamed of his measly 60%!!Yeah, it's more about the technique combined with the dominance, but I get your point.
Still better technique than Stadlober...
Johan Olsson had a good session on Swedish TV about Diggins last weekend, were he talked about how there is a big difference between technique and style.Yeah, it's more about the technique combined with the dominance, but I get your point.
Still better technique than Stadlober...
Wildly, she's actually more aesthetic to watch in classic nowadays![]()
This is a really good post; spot on IMHO. The thing that seems to be driving her classic improvement is really increased core stability (and of course helps skating too); watching her going up the hill in the sprint yesterday she was rock solid in the core which allows her to keep those hips high and forward, and from there everything is working, kick, poling, etc. Last year she was constantly sinking into the back seat and everything just stops when that happens (plus it looks horrendous).Johan Olsson had a good session on Swedish TV about Diggins last weekend, were he talked about how there is a big difference between technique and style.
Diggins have a very messy style, but her tecnique isn't bad at all in skating. If you chopped all the female skiers in half (haha) and only looked at their movement from the waist an down I'd say Diggins is perhaps the best. Her hips are stable and her angles are overall very good, meaning she gets the power down in the right direction. The upper body movement isn't that great, but not that bad either, but her head movememt makes everything look extremely chaotic. But the head movement is perhaps the one movement during a race that have the smallest affect of your performance.
Petter Northug was also a skier where the technique were better than his style in skating, even if he had different issues than Diggins. Both had some kind of strange looking head movement, but where Diggins is executing really good with the legs, Northug was executing really well with the upper body.
I honestly think Diggins technique in skating is a lot better than many of her biggest opponents.
Yeah, otherwise her descending and cornering wouldn't be that great, it's more about the extra upper body movement that makes her skiing a lot less economic.Johan Olsson had a good session on Swedish TV about Diggins last weekend, were he talked about how there is a big difference between technique and style.
Diggins have a very messy style, but her tecnique isn't bad at all in skating. If you chopped all the female skiers in half (haha) and only looked at their movement from the waist an down I'd say Diggins is perhaps the best. Her hips are stable and her angles are overall very good, meaning she gets the power down in the right direction. The upper body movement isn't that great, but not that bad either, but her head movememt makes everything look extremely chaotic. But the head movement is perhaps the one movement during a race that have the smallest affect of your performance.
Petter Northug was also a skier where the technique were better than his style in skating, even if he had different issues than Diggins. Both had some kind of strange looking head movement, but where Diggins is executing really good with the legs, Northug was executing really well with the upper body.
I honestly think Diggins technique in skating is a lot better than many of her biggest opponents.
It's these dumb short loops that really erase the benefit of the interval start; it's such a lottery in terms of who you get to ski with around the course. Just like mens race...If Carl started early before the snowfall got stronger and had found someone on the way (like Heidi Weng did with Dolci) she could have been fighting for the win.
It's been a "big four" relay teams for years. Used to be Austria 5th with Sumann, Mesotitsch and Landertinger, now it's Sweden 5th with Ponsiluoma and Samuelsson.Back to total Norwegian domination in the men's 10km race. No one came remotely close this time.
Very impressive performance by Deggendorf in what appeared to be a really tough race for the women.
Crazy gaps in the men's relay if Norwa had not backen off in the end. The Qualität of the men' s fiels seems really deuted.
Very interesting, I'm also a skater coming from running and cycling background. I had spent a lot of time becoming a strong double poler and was very solid in V2(what we call it in the US) but was having issues with V1 on steep hills. It wasn't until I did a video session with a really good coach that I could see what was going on (hips not high enough, which in turn kills shin/ankle angles), and things changed overnight. Physics combined with physiology can be strange; what works for one might be disastrous for another even though the basics are similar.Yeah, otherwise her descending and cornering wouldn't be that great, it's more about the extra upper body movement that makes her skiing a lot less economic.
Frankly, as a skating guy with a cycling background and lack of upper body strength I'm not one to talk big. My lower body technique also blows my upper body technique out of the water. That said, my uphill V1 on longer climbs is probably my biggest strength.
It's Jeanmonnot that cost them this race though, she lost 1'10 to Vittozzi. I know they aren't going to - and shouldn't - drop her, and Guigonnat was in in place of Chevalier who is both sick and capitulated in Östersund. The World Cup being down in Austria while the IBU Cup was up in Sweden precluded it, but I'd have been very interested in what Jeanne Richard could have done. She's been great this season, Michelon is a bit more volatile so Richard should be next one up regardless, especially for the relays, and she's four years younger than Guigonnat too.This Norwegian relay team with Arnekleiv, Skogan, Knotten and Tandrevold is looking really strong, injuries or illnesses aside its likely the Worlds team.
The French messed up by putting Guigonnat in the first leg of the relay, she's too slow.
I never made it as a skier to reach any form of high level, but I've done my hours with filming and analysis of technique training on roller skis and ski (both mine and with guys in the same training group - a lot better skiers than me, a couple of guys that won medals in Norwegian Championship at junior level, but they never made it at elite level) and back in our days we used to watch clips of Ole Einar Bjørndalen. He was seen as the perfect skater 15-20 years ago and one thing with his style was the very stable head, a thing you see with some of the most elegant skiers like Kruger and Røthe aswell, and I think that's one of the reason why we easily get fooled by Diggins, because her head goes everywhere.Yeah, otherwise her descending and cornering wouldn't be that great, it's more about the extra upper body movement that makes her skiing a lot less economic.
Frankly, as a skating guy with a cycling background and lack of upper body strength I'm not one to talk big. My lower body technique also blows my upper body technique out of the water. That said, my uphill V1 on longer climbs is probably my biggest strength.
