- Jun 16, 2010
- 1,458
- 0
- 10,480
Granville57
Oh God, No. NO. NO. NO. NO NO
Oh God, Yes.
Please? Please? Please?
Oh God, No. NO. NO. NO. NO NO
Great post. Until I saw the name Dave I thought you were mimicking my girlfriend!
Granville57
Oh God, No. NO. NO. NO. NO NO
Oh God, Yes.
Please? Please? Please?
Oh God, No. NO. NO. NO. NO NO
the contract, and inputs into the delivery of the contract, had been exhausted. yes, i appreciate this. i appreciate Eleven is making a point on after this contract has been delivered, so i see how can there be a deminishing return.D-Queued said:We could have an intelligent conversation about the value of the sponsorship, but this isn't going in that direction.
What eleven is saying is not sound, as eleven has applied the term 'diminishing returns' to the entire future value. If what you are suggesting is the intent (and I have noted the same in my previous post), then this is only one portion of the calculation of the value.
blackcat said:...that USPS laid out millions for that positive glow
but not the drug glow.MacRoadie said:Oh, they laid out millions for a glow alright...![]()
robbiecanuck said:great post. Until i saw the name dave i thought you were mimicking my girlfriend!
Zam_Olyas said:RR, i remember you talk about the use of hemassist and how disturbed you were do you know why it never came out?
Price asked Armstrong if what had happened to him was worth it, and necessary for the good of the sport.
“That’s a great question,” Armstrong replied evenly, “and one that I ask myself every day. My answer is not a popular one. My answer is that it wasn’t worth it.
“I can look at what it’s done to our sport, I look at how teams and sponsors are fleeing, events are folding, participation is down,” Armstrong said. “It all stems from choices I made. But with all due respect, [the USADA investigation] was not an effort to clean up cycling. Because in order to do that you have to truly take a global view and a global look at this thing, and a global commission has to do it, which I think we’ve started to do now.”
Read more at http://velonews.competitor.com/2014...ion-helped-cycling_333679#xSYl4WjkqUbKWV2G.99
the sceptic said:Lance obviously wishes he never got busted, but I have to agree with him that cycling isnt any better now than it was 10 years ago. Doping didnt begin and end with Lance.
DirtyWorks said:This is all true. But, then what happens is Wonderboy uses it like a wedge and dumps lie after lie after lie on top of it. It's a kind of manipulation that is just awesome if it wasn't so terrible.
Let Mercier be. It is the honeymoon phase. He'll be an ex-friend soon enough because that's how Lance works.
DirtyWorks said:This is all true. But, then what happens is Wonderboy uses it like a wedge and dumps lie after lie after lie on top of it. It's a kind of manipulation that is just awesome if it wasn't so terrible.
Let Mercier be. It is the honeymoon phase. He'll be an ex-friend soon enough because that's how Lance works.
the sceptic said:Lance obviously wishes he never got busted, but I have to agree with him that cycling isnt any better now than it was 10 years ago. Doping didnt begin and end with Lance.
What I dont get is why Scott Mercier seems to have a crush on him.
the sceptic said:Lance obviously wishes he never got busted, but I have to agree with him that cycling isnt any better now than it was 10 years ago. Doping didnt begin and end with Lance.
What I dont get is why Scott Mercier seems to have a crush on him.
Bosco10 said:Here's the video FWIW:
http://youtu.be/NYVZbcnAtyU
noddy69 said:I actually think where Lance states that Scott had his degree to fall back on others didn't so decided to stay and fight is the most honest I have heard him. He just says I cheated, it was part of the time and I did it......took his sweet time but decent to hear it with no fake tears, nothing attached just an assessment of what he did.....I'm not saying he is great for doing it but at least he is doing it now...........however his attitude to was it good for cycling is still bolo*x
Bosco10 said:Bill Gates ain't never got his degree neither.
Benotti69 said:He thought he was too big to fall. F##K him!
Benotti69 said:What Lance is forgetting, conveniently, is while he and his team doped the cards were stacked in his favour as he had the UCI in his back pocket. Yeah he doped but he took it to levels not seen in the sport. 7tdfs in a row and he never looked like he was going lose any of them!
No Lance was not just another doper in a sport full of it. Lance was 'the' doper of the sport.
There are plenty of jobs in society that dont require a college degree and are honourable and respectable. Dont remember Bassons having a degree, Obree neither.
Again Armstrong trying to paint himself as unfairly treated. How many other guys retired from the sport with a fortune in excess of 100million$? How many other riders had learjets?
Armstrong had his chance to do good for the sport and talk to Tygart. He thought he was too big to fall. F##K him!
Armstrong’s foreword reflects Ms O’Reilly’s belief that he should not take the sole blame for a problem that was endemic in professional cycling long before he arrived on the scene.
Stingray34 said:On Australia's ABC1 channel, The 5-star rated, 'Stop at Nothing: The Lance Armstrong Story,' is broadcast at 8.30pmEST on Wednesday, July 2.
Apparently, Armstrong is openly labelled a sociopath in the doco.
If some posters with some technical nous can rip of find a way around the inevitable geo-block, I think it will be greatly appreciated.
Doubt there will be anything new, but the the preview I saw had no-nothings openly condemn the guy. The worm has well and truly turned.
gooner said:It's on BBC4 in the UK/Ireland this Sunday 9.00pm.
Supposed to be much better than The Armstrong Lie.