The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Mellow Velo said:Evans takes roughly a second per Km out of Contador, which is roughly in line with their 2007 Tour efforts.
Bertie will want tomorrow's stage as I think it's significant to both him and the team, but he'll have a tough time taking a minute out of the Aussie, who's obviously in good nick.
The St. Francois de Longchamp finish is two thirds of the Madeleine, at 8%, so far from easy.
Especially after the Croix and Galibier.
Midnight said:Evans is going well but his team is failing around him, already 2 members have quit. What a shame that a competitive rider never seems to have the team around him at the big tours. If the same applies at the TDF I cant see him reaching the top step of the podium.![]()
My thoughts exactly.BroDeal said:Good ride by Evans but I cannot shake the suspicion that Evans is near his highest level and Contador will kick it up a notch by Tour time.
jackhammer111 said:you sure you don't mean weeken in the last weak? lmao
are you sure you didn't mean peek?
you called me a dumb @ss over word use?
BroDeal said:Good ride by Evans but I cannot shake the suspicion that Evans is near his highest level and Contador will kick it up a notch by Tour time.
BroDeal said:There is a difference between a typo and someone who does not know the difference between lose and loose, cannot capitialize, is unable to organize his writing into paragraphs, has never expressed an original thought, and has fully demonstrated that he is in possession of a low bandwidth brain.
dimspace said:either that or someone has stolen cadel and replaced him with an imposter..![]()
BroDeal said:There is a difference between a typo and someone who does not know the difference between lose and loose, cannot capitialize, is unable to organize his writing into paragraphs, has never expressed an original thought, and has fully demonstrated that he is in possession of a low bandwidth brain.
lookkg386 said:Give him tour favouritism and watch the pressure turn him....
I think being slightly under the radar this build up has been in his favour.
jackhammer111 said:i've never been able to warm up to cadel. he's so introverted. he seems at war with the world, and it makes me suspicious. it's not right, it's just the way i feel.
lookkg386 said:From Cadel's point of view if dull wins you the tour then so be it.
I for one have found his recent attitude towards media etc. quite wierd also, but if he is dull or not whatever - has never worried me enough to dislike him for it.
biker jk said:Which part of his "attitude towards the media etc." did you find weird? Cadel's reaction to the journalist poking him in the shoulder he landed on when he fell? His comment that he'll cut the journalist's head off if his dog was stepped on? That was rather funny. For a supposed "introvert" he seems to be expressing a lot of emotion in public and then he's called "dull". I think some posters don't like his riding style ("he never attacks") and this colours their percetion of his character.
dimspace said:i just dont get him... and im frankly flummoxed by his form..
he just doesnt... oh i dunno..
ok..
hes dull..
there.. ive said it..
(i cannot guage his level of popularity amongst the other riders)
lookkg386 said:Which part of his attitude - well you pretty much answered that yourself, the journalist who "poked" him in the shoulder was an Aussie , and apparently a good friend (??).
Captain Kirk said:I can only relate my experience of Cadel, which was racing the Australian MTB circuit in the 93-96 period when CE was a junior and started racing up in Expert.
CE got a lot of attention within MTB instantly, as he was thrashing our then elite (not hard) as 16/17 year old, then the road fraternity saw his potential – and then the AIS lab rats got him. They say he is the first AIS athlete to be completely profiled from the start.
So aside from instant attention from day 1, he was always not a spotlight kinda guy (eg McEwan/Armstrong).
Introvert, yes.
Earnest, yes.
Product managers dream, no.
Media savvy, no.
Approachable demeanour, no.
Always on the podium, but not comfortable on it……….Ive gotta alot of autographs from back then, but not his ? This has only just occurred to me, and kinda sums it up.
Cadel is the antithesis of “Lance”. Lance is a human logo or product that maximises return on his key strengths, those skill sets LA uses so well are unnatural to Cadel.
I have never met anyone who naturally warms to Cadel, at that means in Australia……we respect him and are proud of what he has achieved – but a word such as “admire” does not seem not to fit.
As many of you have stated, you have respect, but cannot put finger on it why seems hard to like…..he’s a conundrum.