The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
The Hitch said:I'm starting to think froome won't even podium this year. The tour in recent years has been dominated by guys who are on form all year. There are some exceptions but the winners especially last 3 years have been the guys who peak 6 months.
Valverde vs Contador. Unfortunately for Valverde, he cannot win that battle from what I see.
Ironically the vuelta has in recent years been dominated by the opposite, guys who do very little all season.
LaFlorecita said:Who would be 3rd then?
I still think Froome is the top favorite and will be very hard to beat.
Netserk said:There was a tailwind on the climb today.
roundabout said:He only won today because Contador did not race
roundabout said:He only won today because Contador did not race
Justico said:After being spanked by Contador few weeks ago he eats a few extra steaks, boom Gilbert 2011 record vanished.
Ridiculous.
The "Dope Wars: Episode 2014 - Old School Dopers Strike Back" will only end up in a totally doped peleton, again.
the sceptic said:actually, its pretty scary that this is the same Valverde that got toyed with by Contador a couple of weeks ago.
Of course, there were tailwinds, and Horner was faster.. but still. Froome is in big trouble in july imo.
roundabout said:40-1-2-21-7-(8)-46-7-1
Hmmm
Not anywhere near a podium in the previous 5 editions he rode in the "absolutely Valverde territory".
Libertine Seguros said:With the exception of 2012 when everything went wrong for him in the Ardennes though, he's been up there regularly in the top 10. In 2008, the edition where he was 21st, he followed that up by winning LBL, so it's not like he had a bad Ardennes campaign. He's been top 10 in 5 of his last 5 Ardennes classics and won his last real puncheur finish from a bunch before this, admittedly against a much weaker field.
Again, Roma Maxima was a much bigger surprise, with the multiple attacks from distance; hiding in the bunch on a short, steep ascent and timing the sprint right at the end is well within Valverde's remit, even at his weakest. Flèche is about timing. In 2008 Evans was the strongest on the final climb, went too early and faded, Kirchen won. In 2010 Contador and Antón were the aggressors, but Evans profited. Today Martin had to come from positioned quite far back, which meant he wasn't able to answer Valverde's sprint; Kwiatkowski had done a bit too much work in lead position for my money.
I do not think that Don Alejandro is clean, though I do think he's a talented cyclist. I don't understand why he gets so much more hate than a number of other dopers, other than that he was lucky enough to have a good enough legal team to mean he wasn't banned while he was protesting his innocence. He is almost certainly doping in 2014, and his victory today was almost certainly influenced by it. I just don't think La Flèche Wallonne 2014 was an especially remarkable performance for a guy with his characteristics, capabilities and palmarès, and not one that jumped out at me as "this is beyond the pale".
Benotti69 said:He is getting attention due to the fastest ever ascent of the Muur de Huy.
That is remarkable.
BigMac said:Then you have to take a look at all the riders who were in the group and not just Valverde. They climbed together for the great majority of the climb. Valverde only attacked in the last meters, which did little difference to the overall timing. I bet the time gained on Gilbert's previous record was done while the group was still together.
BigMac said:Then you have to take a look at all the riders who were in the group and not just Valverde. They climbed together for the great majority of the climb. Valverde only attacked in the last meters, which did little difference to the overall timing. I bet the time gained on Gilbert's previous record was done while the group was still together.
The Hitch said:Its not a direct comparison between one ascent and another. Sure there are plenty of variables that could result in 2011 being ridden slower than 2014 that have nothing to do with doping.
But what Valverde did was set the record. That means he didn't just beat 2011. He beat every year. A much bigger sample. And the bigger the sample the more the variables even themselves out.
Beating the entire sample, by 3 seconds, means that even if you have certain advantages that particular year, its still suspicious.