He never was, apart from the role of TdF domestique.
I mean that both Vans were close in those cobbled races a few years ago (not anymore) plus obviously's Wout great performances in various kind of races. It seems he doesn't have it anymore.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
He never was, apart from the role of TdF domestique.
2020 was the only time they finished same group in RVV.I mean that both Vans were close in those cobbled races a few years ago (not anymore) plus obviously's Wout great performances in various kind of races. It seems he doesn't have it anymore.
2020 was the only time they finished same group in RVV.
But my point absolutely stands that most of Van Aerts reputation is based on the TdF, and not based on monument performance for a very long time.
People used to want me banned for saying thisVan Aert is a Belgian Pozzato. Win Sanremo and some semi classics, primadonna, race defensively, not use his attack. Will never be world champion like Ballan
Lol.The 'problem' is Visma beating a dead horse by continually acting like he's a monument contender for Flanders and Roubaix, i.e. literally sending him to altitude training especially for these spring classics.
He'd be better off going to Paris-Nice, Catalunya and then heading to the Tour de France. He can do what he does best: help his GC leader and target specific stages.
15, coincidentally also the number of winless monument participations he hasWhich rank today in Harelbeke for Wout?…
Lol.
He should target the cobbles.
But skipping Sanremo is absolutely braindead.
Yep. This altitude camp wil also turn out to be a big mistake as a lot of people have predicted. He should have raced much more given his lack of confidence. Wout seemed to be struggling emotionally in the interview after the race. Body language of someone who's feeling defeated.Lol.
He should target the cobbles.
But skipping Sanremo is absolutely braindead.
I don't think you can place the blame entirely at the feet of Belgian fans and media for obsessing about the spring: Wout has frequently said those races are the most important of the entire calendar for him.I think what I'm getting at is the discourse around this rider is based on something that's lost in translation.
When he dominates his job in the TdF (does really good work for his GC leader and wins some stages), for some reason there's a whole bunch of people who see that and interpret it as 'oh yeah, let's now win Flanders + Roubaix or bust'
I mean unless his Vuelta crash has somehow crippled him and made him 'lesser', he was still totally smashing the points classification and winning stages before his DNF. That's what he's good at. But then Visma and the whole Belgian world once again start obsessing over the spring campaign - again.
I don't know man but Wout van Aert is a formidable bike rider in his own right when doing what he does best. Fighting VdP is not what he does best. And when Wout van Aert is riding on the front in the Tour doing pulls for Vingegaard or winning stages, VdP will be riding gruppetto.
So, each to their own, right? VdP is a different type of rider.
I honestly feel for Van Aert.I don't think you can place the blame entirely at the feet of Belgian fans and media for obsessing about the spring: Wout has frequently said those races are the most important of the entire calendar for him.
Maybe the best thing that could happen to him would be Thibau Nys targeting the spring classics next year.I honestly feel for Van Aert.
Not because he loses in the cobbled classics, that happens to everyone.
But I feel for van Aert because his entire country is people who are armchair experts in his psyche.
I don't think you can place the blame entirely at the feet of Belgian fans and media for obsessing about the spring: Wout has frequently said those races are the most important of the entire calendar for him.
I think what I'm getting at is the discourse around this rider is based on something that's lost in translation.
When he dominates his job in the TdF (does really good work for his GC leader and wins some stages), for some reason there's a whole bunch of people who see that and interpret it as 'oh yeah, let's now win Flanders + Roubaix or bust'
I mean unless his Vuelta crash has somehow crippled him and made him 'lesser', he was still totally smashing the points classification and winning stages before his DNF. That's what he's good at. But then Visma and the whole Belgian world once again start obsessing over the spring campaign - again.
I don't know man but Wout van Aert is a formidable bike rider in his own right when doing what he does best. Fighting VdP is not what he does best. And when Wout van Aert is riding on the front in the Tour doing pulls for Vingegaard or winning stages, VdP will be riding gruppetto.
So, each to their own, right? VdP is a different type of rider.
Unless my memory is jammed, when he came on the scene he was touted as a classics rider and Rabofail were more than happy to put all their eggs in the WVA basket. Even after his first exceptional performance in the TdF, the Monuments were still seen as a priority by the team and he remained sole leader.
Stupid decision by Rabofail to stroke his ego.
Weird to think he could retire without a cobbled Monument while Niki Terpstra is sitting at home with two on the mantelpiece (thanks to Quickstep employing a multi-pronged attack)
They have dominated semi-classics though for a couple of seasons (not this season). Won a lot of those races. Then nowhere in the monuments.Rog is still the last rider to win a monument for Visma.
Crazy... but true. I mean yeah, every year Visma (& formerly Jumbo) do a huge public relations campaign about the classics season being a priority.
And every year the outcome is the same. Why? Because they never had the best monument riders. And they often shot themselves in the foot by riding like they did (aka extremely passive tactics a lot of the time with the expectation WvA could go toe-to-toe with VdP and Pog in Flanders or VdP in Roubaix).
You're acting like they're trying to cover up this fact. Quite the contrary actually, the reason you know it's their last Monument win is because they keep repeating it themselves, since a victory in a cobbled Monument is the only thing that still evades them. They've won pretty much every other race.Rog is still the last rider to win a monument for Visma.
Crazy... but true. I mean yeah, every year Visma (& formerly Jumbo) do a huge public relations campaign about the classics season being a priority.
And every year the outcome is the same. Why? Because they never had the best monument riders. And they often shot themselves in the foot by riding like they did (aka extremely passive tactics a lot of the time with the expectation WvA could go toe-to-toe with VdP and Pog in Flanders or VdP in Roubaix).
Depends on what you call "competitive". He has to be at his very best to at least offer up some kind of challenge to MVDP, and clearly he's not at his very best. I've said it before, and it's pretty clear from today that Jorgenson is their only (sort of) shot at a podium in Flanders... with a lot of luck.Wout will be competitive in RVV no doubt. Still it will be really tough to match MVDP.