- Jul 30, 2009
- 1,621
- 0
- 0
auscyclefan94 said:5 man teams? Gee that is small!
Aye. Should hopefully make the race interesting!
auscyclefan94 said:5 man teams? Gee that is small!
The Hitch said:But as I understand the hill is about 2km.
All of it will be out of bounds?
Anyone know if there are any other uphill areas where one can watch maybe?
Winterfold said:Mass civil disobedience is a possible option![]()
auscyclefan94 said:5 man teams? Gee that is small!
auscyclefan94 said:5 man teams? Gee that is small!
Andy99 said:Squad sizes for the Olympic Road Race announced by the UCI today...
http://www.uci.ch/Modules/BUILTIN/g...bjTypeCode=FILE&type=FILE&id=NzM5ODE&LangId=1
Notably;
AUS 5
BEL 5
CAN 1
DEN 4
ESP 5
FRA 4
GBR 5
GER 5
IRL 3
ITA 5
KAZ 2
LUX 2
NED 5
NOR 3
NZL 2
SWE 1
USA 5
AussieGoddess said:also Swiss gets 5. Cance will be pretty happy. Will he go all out for TT or road race?
AussieGoddess said:I thought it had always been 5 man teams at Olympics.
And 2 of those must ride the Time Trial.
auscyclefan94 said:5 man teams? Gee that is small!
ingsve said:Ya, that's what makes the olympics a bit of a joke. Unlike other sports the Olympics is far from the most prestigious race to win. I think it would almost struggle to make the top 10.
Ferminal said:Is it a joke because 5 is too small relative to the 8 in a monument, or 9 in the worlds, or because 5 is fundamentally too small for a cycling team?
Ferminal said:Is it a joke because 5 is too small relative to the 8 in a monument, or 9 in the worlds, or because 5 is fundamentally too small for a cycling team?
With Sanchez, Bettini, and Ullrich as the most recent Olympic champions, I think your lottery argument doesn't fly. Yes, it might be raced a little differently, less controlled because it's hard to control a race with 5 man teams, but is that a bad thing? Clearly the winner has to be strong regardless. Maybe even stronger.ingsve said:Well 5 is not too small regardless of circumstances. There are plenty of races that only have 6 man teams for example. But when you compare it with other major races then having 5 riders instead of 8 or 9 makes a huge difference in how the race is raced and that means it drops in significance quite a bit. It becomes more of a lottery than what I consider acceptable in a top road race.
Archibald said:Bobridge(TT), Porte(TT), Goss, Renshaw, Haussler... choo choo!! ??
ingsve said:Ya, that's what makes the olympics a bit of a joke. Unlike other sports the Olympics is far from the most prestigious race to win. I think it would almost struggle to make the top 10.
just some guy said:Bobridge will be track riding and nowhere near the RR unless he watches from the stands imo
if the TT riders must ride the RR
Then Evans,Porte,O´Grady,The Hussler and Goss
With Rogers as reserve
Not for most sprinters, but Cavendish has been dropped on far easier parcours. In absolute top shape he has a chance though.Jukebox said:http://app.strava.com/segments/627910
Thats a link to GPS data for box hill. It's a very steady grade and the best amateurs are climbing the hill in 5 and a half minutes at almost 17 miles an hour(27kph). I really don't see this being an issue at all for the sprinters.
maltiv said:Not for most sprinters, but Cavendish has been dropped on far easier parcours. In absolute top shape he has a chance though.
