Libertine Seguros said:
I assume you mean the Normans, who were a mostly Viking people, mixed with native Frankish (Germans) and Gallo-Roman (pre-French) people. The language was French but the ethnicity only a minority. Britain had surely already been built by the Romans anyway?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angevin_Empire
French is as far as I know not an ethnicity and the nation state of France didn't exist during the middle ages and early modern times. The family that ruled in England originated from (modern day) France and they spoke French thus I'm calling them French. Just making a statement(by making a silly statement) about how silly it is to insult one's country by its past(the dude referring to Australia)
Cause as I see it, I'd rather have a nation(I should actually use the term kingdom here in the case of the occupation by the Plantagenet family) build up by convicts than one that's build up by the French!
Influence of the French ruling class on the English language(which is not a Romance language, but a lot of words come from the French language bc of the conquest of the British island) is huge.
---------
Anyhow... If Cavendish manages to win in Australia I'll eat up my hat. After I broke his knee! (sarcasm)
But if I have to be honest, I really don't want him to win. Sour grapes for what he did to Boonen!
Ps: Frankish people are not Germans. Frankish tribes (who originated from what the Romans referred to as Magna Germania which is an incorrect generalization anyway) for example "conquered"(most of the Germanic migrations to the Roman empire in the 4th and 5th century were "peaceful" mind you) parts of the Roman empire and assimilated with the local population as time flew by as they were in a large minority. It's all a mix really.