Or he'll end up sleeping with the fishes!Let's get it out of the way, I don't expect anything apart from Fuentes thumbing his nose at UCI/WADA and doing the usual 'I know stuff, but I won't tell' act.
Or he'll end up sleeping with the fishes!Let's get it out of the way, I don't expect anything apart from Fuentes thumbing his nose at UCI/WADA and doing the usual 'I know stuff, but I won't tell' act.
He said something similar in the past. And nothing.Here is what a friend posted (on a group in facebook) about what is being said about the interview. (I'll post what he said in Spanish and then the way it's translated)
El médico canario Eufemiano Fuentes será el protagonista, el próximo domingo, en Lo de Évole, programa de entrevistas conducido por el periodista catalán Jordi Évole. En el extracto que el programa ha utilizado para promocionar la emisión, Fuentes considera “casi seguro” que habrá quien esté nervioso por lo que pueda decir.
Fuentes, además, reconoce que “hacía trampas”, evitando, al menos en este extracto, usar la palabra dopaje y añade que “no conozco a nadie que no las hiciera”. Así mismo, asegura que si él contara todo lo que sabe, alguna de las medallas conseguidas por los deportistas españoles en los JJOO de Barcelona de 1992 serían retiradas. Lo de Évole se emitirá el próximo domingo a las 21:25 horas en La Sexta.
Fuente: Ciclo 21.
A bit off topic, but the most extreme example of a team running and running and not slowing down that I can remember was South Korea in the 2002 WC.Don't teams who have a lot of possession usually not run that many kilometres compared to other teams?
It's less infuriating than losing to Argentina after Cruyff stayed home cause his family was threatened inside their own home, but I was alive for that one.Still bitter about it, yea?As for me, I want to know about the 2008 euro winning team where Spain were at their best.
![]()
Then: "It's a disgrace how much cycling has been linked to Fuentes, why don't people talk instead about all the other sports he was working in?"Fuentes did not talk much about cycling actually, but more on football and athletics.
Then: "It's a disgrace how much cycling has been linked to Fuentes, why don't people talk instead about all the other sports he was working in?"
Now: "It's a disgrace how little cycling has been discussed by Fuentes, he talked instead about all the other sports he was working in!"
That has been almost all of the reporting, and apparently Real Madrid is seriously considering a lawsuit because of his statements.Him and what football clubs Fuentes worked with seem to be the big takeaways from the whole show.
TBH I'm not in favour of singling out one scandal and GOATing it. The wider story is important, from the hope enlivened by police raids at the Giro and the Tour through the despair of cyclisme à deux vitesses and then the long, slow crawl through Cofidis, Puerto, Landis, the Telekom confessions and Freiburg, Rasmussen, the CERA positives, and - ultimately - the Fall of LA. (I'm sure I've missed something in there. I used to know this list off the top of my head.) None of these on their own achieved anything, just like the police raids at the Giro and the Tour, but taken collectively they forced the hands of the teams and the UCI.Operación Puerto is still the biggest doping scandal to ever affect the sport of cycling. One way to avoid mistakes being repeated is to reveal history to current fans of the sport. Likely the UCI blood passport might not exist if not for the impetus provided by the Puerto scandal.
Glad the OP started this thread. I've been lurking here since Floyd Landis was the most popular thread in the Clinic and Operación Puerto is still the biggest doping scandal to ever affect the sport of cycling. One way to avoid mistakes being repeated is to reveal history to current fans of the sport. Likely the UCI blood passport might not exist if not for the impetus provided by the Puerto scandal.
Armstrong was one man. But Puerto snared or implicated many top riders, including Alberto Contador whose Astana team was excluded from the 2006 TdF and Ivan Basso . But of course the biggest part was the links to unnamed athletes from other sports - obviously the world's richest professional sports teams in Football. I think the comment above by Aragon is a big reason why they got away with it and the stored blood bags are still not analyzed and linked to individuals - lawsuits, plus Spanish courts. IMO, justice and fair sport isn't important to those who might have spilled the lid on all those unlinked bags.
Yes its a disgrace and any casual read of events shows that "Spanish courts" worked overtime to clear any implication by Spanish riders. The sliver of hope (and that is a very small sliver) is that the bags still exist (I assume under refrigeration) so still have the potential to be analyzed and linked.
Festina was bigger than Puerto, it showed the sheer depth of doping in the peloton. I remember it breaking and commentators of many sports concerned about the potential fallout for their own sports.Glad the OP started this thread. I've been lurking here since Floyd Landis was the most popular thread in the Clinic and Operación Puerto is still the biggest doping scandal to ever affect the sport of cycling. One way to avoid mistakes being repeated is to reveal history to current fans of the sport. Likely the UCI blood passport might not exist if not for the impetus provided by the Puerto scandal.
Armstrong was one man. But Puerto snared or implicated many top riders, including Alberto Contador whose Astana team was excluded from the 2006 TdF and Ivan Basso . But of course the biggest part was the links to unnamed athletes from other sports - obviously the world's richest professional sports teams in Football. I think the comment above by Aragon is a big reason why they got away with it and the stored blood bags are still not analyzed and linked to individuals - lawsuits, plus Spanish courts. IMO, justice and fair sport isn't important to those who might have spilled the lid on all those unlinked bags.
Yes its a disgrace and any casual read of events shows that "Spanish courts" worked overtime to clear any implication by Spanish riders. The sliver of hope (and that is a very small sliver) is that the bags still exist (I assume under refrigeration) so still have the potential to be analyzed and linked.
Psychic doping?Forget about blood bags, the mere reappearance of Fuentes was enough for Valverde to produce an amazing performance at Gran Premio Miguel EPOrain.
No transcript that I've seen as yet. Marca's live blog, linked in my previous post, has the best summary of it I've seen so far. The closest he seems to have come to the stuff you and I would have liked him to talk about - pre-EPO use of transfusions - was that he used plasma expanders with Fermín Cacho. Him and what football clubs Fuentes worked with seem to be the big takeaways from the whole show.
Links show up better in the forum's dark theme - they're barely visible in the normal onewhere is that link FMK - I can’t seem to find it. TIA!