The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Benotti69 said:angling to be para millar qua angle angling para millar.
guffaws ensue
#blackcatiness
sniper said:Benotti69 said:angling to be para millar qua angle angling para millar.
guffaws ensue
#blackcatiness
Michael Gallagher: "my coach Dan who had no idea"
Millar: "my close friend and coach Dave who had no idea despite dating my sister who was running my program, and despite holding my hand right there in that restaurant in Biarritz when I got blitzed and my house got raided by the French police"
Interesting article. But what I don't understand with Gallagher is he said he obtained a natural Hct of "45.9," that was achieved while clean and boosted with EPO to only "47.7"...a dismal gain of ~3.9% (marginal improvement on VO2max?). However, he says he was seeing a 5% increase in performance...so he must have been a super-high responder or something.Alex Simmons/RST said:
Performance improvement is due to many physiological factors, and is not solely due to changes in HCT. Keep in mind performance can improve while HCT declines, e.g. through increased blood plasma volume after a block of VO2max work. Training that can also increase cardiac output, and of course peripheral adaptations in the muscles (increased mitochondrial enzyme activity, capillarisation etc).Nomad said:Interesting article. But what I don't understand with Gallagher is he said he obtained a natural Hct of "45.9," that was achieved while clean and boosted with EPO to only "47.7"...a dismal gain of ~3.9% (marginal improvement on VO2max?). However, he says he was seeing a 5% increase in performance...so he must have been a super-high responder or something.Alex Simmons/RST said: