• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

  • We hope all of you have a great holiday season and an incredible New Year. Thanks so much for being part of the Cycling News community!

Paris-Nice 2023, March 5-12

Page 50 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
l34rtUx.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: JosefK
Even a sprinter stage would have been more exciting than this one. Unless you're a fan of Arabia/Slovenia of course.
Man, today was decent enough I think. Hard racing, and the best rider just took the race and won. That in itself is always pretty interesting to me.

Sure, some other years this stage has been a lot better, but they have also been incredible and probably overperformed a bit. We shouldnt expect that kinda racing every year.
 
It has been a good litmus test for what kind of fan you are.

Do you prefer the stage race dominated by a Slovenian, as expected, who attacks every mountain stage and leaves his rivals scattered in a trail behind him, who constantly races aggressively and put on a show, but who leaves nothing to doubt or no suspense. Almost dominant to a depressing extent.


Or do you prefer the stage race dominated by a Slovenian, as expected, who wins every stage in a sprint and will win the GC on bonus seconds, who does nothing interesting or daring throughout the race, and possibly doesnt deserve to win, but does constantly give the impression that the race lead could change hands and looks sometimes vulnerable
 
It has been a good litmus test for what kind of fan you are.

Do you prefer the stage race dominated by a Slovenian, as expected, who attacks every mountain stage and leaves his rivals scattered in a trail behind him, who constantly races aggressively and put on a show, but who leaves nothing to doubt or no suspense. Almost dominant to a depressing extent.


Or do you prefer the stage race dominated by a Slovenian, as expected, who wins every stage in a sprint and will win the GC on bonus seconds, who does nothing interesting or daring throughout the race, and possibly doesnt deserve to win, but does constantly give the impression that the race lead could change hands and looks sometimes vulnerable
Neither
 
It has been a good litmus test for what kind of fan you are.

Do you prefer the stage race dominated by a Slovenian, as expected, who attacks every mountain stage and leaves his rivals scattered in a trail behind him, who constantly races aggressively and put on a show, but who leaves nothing to doubt or no suspense. Almost dominant to a depressing extent.


Or do you prefer the stage race dominated by a Slovenian, as expected, who wins every stage in a sprint and will win the GC on bonus seconds, who does nothing interesting or daring throughout the race, and possibly doesnt deserve to win, but does constantly give the impression that the race lead could change hands and looks sometimes vulnerable
Whatever race Landa is in.
 
You're not on high altitude for a long time even during high altitude stages. And watts at while chill pacing in the peloton are not the same as watts on the final MTF going full throttle.

You don’t need to be at altitude for long, for the effect to be profound, as the fatigue accumulates during the stage.

Also I find it odd you assert Jumbo are wrong about Vingegaard… I’m pretty sure they know better than you ;)
 
It has been a good litmus test for what kind of fan you are.

Do you prefer the stage race dominated by a Slovenian, as expected, who attacks every mountain stage and leaves his rivals scattered in a trail behind him, who constantly races aggressively and put on a show, but who leaves nothing to doubt or no suspense. Almost dominant to a depressing extent.


Or do you prefer the stage race dominated by a Slovenian, as expected, who wins every stage in a sprint and will win the GC on bonus seconds, who does nothing interesting or daring throughout the race, and possibly doesnt deserve to win, but does constantly give the impression that the race lead could change hands and looks sometimes vulnerable
I prefer not knowing who wins with a 99% certainty before a stage even starts. What Pogacar doesn't isn't daring because he knows he is the best in the race with 100% confidence so there's no risk in attacking and flying away.

But I love how Jumbo dominance is boring while this is apparently mesmerising to watch.
 
I don't know how could you say guys that Pogacar makes cycling boring. If you want to have 100% of unpredictability, go and play some lottery. In general, cycling is a very unpredictable sport comparing to other disciplines. Pogacar is (putting clinic stuff aside) a truly, naturally gifted cyclist and I myslef enjoy cycling with figures like him much more than I would if every race would be won by a different rider and everyone would be complaining that it was mostly by accident and different tactic gimmicks.
 
Chapeau to Pogacar on the spectacular victory of the stage and the race! He took off on Eze and gained 45' on this relatively short climb and kept his lead till the end. How different feelings for Yates this year - last year he won after attacking while this time he was brutally counter-attacked by Le Patron.

Yates was OK but if he had his 2022 form he still would have been 20 or 30 seconds off Pogacar.
 

Latest posts