sniper said:no, i don't have all the answers. but neither do i see any reason to give JV the benefit of the doubt like many back then were giving Lance and Bruyneel the benefit of the doubt. There are too many parallels. In fact, I currently see no indications whatsoever that suggest JV's Garmin is clean. He's claiming Sky is clean fcol, and is using the same rethorics as Lance and Bruyneel used to sell us and fully in line with Brailsford. Give me one reason why JV or his doctors deserve the benefit of the doubt? Because he says so? Give me something tangible (other than Kimmage's 2008 internship please, cuz that's outdated). If you don't have anything, then he, like everybody else in cycling, does NOT deserve the benefit of our deeply rooted doubts.
You know what? You will never convinced. I have asked you before how the hell you go about proving you have't done something or aren't doing something and your answer to that was plain lame. If it tickles your fancy to think JV is as dirty as Bruyneel and Armstrong, you are welcome to it. But Don't moan if people get a bit tired of you every now and then.