• The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Pre Tour de France-thread

Page 29 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Re:

Robert5091 said:
Weather wise, the hope for windy weather is pretty much dashed according to the weather forecast. Can be up to 30C - sweaty.

Because of TTT and Roubaix stage, most of the climbers will be up against it after first week anyway, so the lack of crosswinds might actually be a blessing when the GC fight is concerned.
 
Re: Re:

Koronin said:
The Hegelian said:
On another topic: how do people rate Uran's chances? He was 54 seconds off winning a tdf last year. Definitely flown under the radar this year - people talk more about Bernal......


Unlikely due to Slipstream almost folding last year and loosing most of their riders then scrambling to field a full team for this year. He won't exactly have any support in the mountains and not sure he'll have a very good TTT either.
Not like he had much support in the mountains last year with Talansky and Rolland both getting ill during the race.

If Rolland and Martinez are in form, he could have better support in mounains in 2018 than in 2017.

TTT will be a problem, though. While this EF's roster is not awful TT-wise (Scully, Craddock and Martinez all have shown some TT form this year, Clarke was a part of some Orica's TTT wins in the past, Phinney's and Vanmarcke's presence should not slow them down either), some teams are bound to do much better than them, and with 35kms, gaps are going to be significant. And Uran's success in the past usually came with limiting losses rather than from chasing lost time.
 
Re: Re:

Põhja Konn said:
Robert5091 said:
Weather wise, the hope for windy weather is pretty much dashed according to the weather forecast. Can be up to 30C - sweaty.

Because of TTT and Roubaix stage, most of the climbers will be up against it after first week anyway, so the lack of crosswinds might actually be a blessing when the GC fight is concerned.

Agree - it could be a nightmare scenario, GC wise. of QS & Sky racing off with crosswinds and the TdF being over before the first weekend.
 
Re:

Logic-is-your-friend said:
Never a fan of TTT in a GT, but as far as this one goes... isn't it relatively short? I'm hoping the timedifferences would be relatively small. These guys get close to 60km/h at times, meaning the overall time for a team timetrial should be around 40 minutes?

It's 35.5 km, up and down a bit and in a loop from start to finish...
stage-3-profile.jpg


and some nice straight sections where the better teams can really crank it up
stage-3-route.jpg
 
Re:

Logic-is-your-friend said:
Never a fan of TTT in a GT, but as far as this one goes... isn't it relatively short? I'm hoping the timedifferences would be relatively small. These guys get close to 60km/h at times, meaning the overall time for a team timetrial should be around 40 minutes?
35km is quite a bit more than what we are getting in most of the stage races nowadays. Usually TTTs are no longer than aroud 25km.

The 2009 TdF had a TTT of a similar length (38km). The gaps were rather significant. 3rd team lost 40 seconds. 10th team lost over 2 minutes.
 
Re: Re:

Anderis said:
Logic-is-your-friend said:
Never a fan of TTT in a GT, but as far as this one goes... isn't it relatively short? I'm hoping the timedifferences would be relatively small. These guys get close to 60km/h at times, meaning the overall time for a team timetrial should be around 40 minutes?
35km is quite a bit more than what we are getting in most of the stage races nowadays. Usually TTTs are no longer than aroud 25km.

The 2009 TdF had a TTT of a similar length (38km). The gaps were rather significant. 3rd team lost 40 seconds. 10th team lost over 2 minutes.

It's longer because it's a 3 week race ;)
 
Mod hat on:

Hi all. We're aware that this situation is a big deal but can we please point out that speculation about the case specifically belongs in the clinic, not in here. You are free to comment on what effect you think Froome's presence will have on the race, but it's not acceptable to speculate on why you think this decision was made. It's also off-topic.

Cheers,

KB.
 
Re: Re:

Anderis said:
Koronin said:
The Hegelian said:
On another topic: how do people rate Uran's chances? He was 54 seconds off winning a tdf last year. Definitely flown under the radar this year - people talk more about Bernal......


Unlikely due to Slipstream almost folding last year and loosing most of their riders then scrambling to field a full team for this year. He won't exactly have any support in the mountains and not sure he'll have a very good TTT either.
Not like he had much support in the mountains last year with Talansky and Rolland both getting ill during the race.

If Rolland and Martinez are in form, he could have better support in mounains in 2018 than in 2017.

TTT will be a problem, though. While this EF's roster is not awful TT-wise (Scully, Craddock and Martinez all have shown some TT form this year, Clarke was a part of some Orica's TTT wins in the past, Phinney's and Vanmarcke's presence should not slow them down either), some teams are bound to do much better than them, and with 35kms, gaps are going to be significant. And Uran's success in the past usually came with limiting losses rather than from chasing lost time.
This.
If anything he comes back with a stronger team and more focused. I don't think they were expecting too much last year. Not to mention the podium.
 
If, as some people on this forum are definitely hoping for (in fact even stating openly they would get involved in it) Froome was to be interfered with by a spectator, does anybody not think that the racing has to stop while he gets back on? Or is it still a case of 'its a race not a trip to the shops'.
 
Re:

Singer01 said:
If, as some people on this forum are definitely hoping for (in fact even stating openly they would get involved in it) Froome was to be interfered with by a spectator, does anybody not think that the racing has to stop while he gets back on? Or is it still a case of 'its a race not a trip to the shops'.

Have people really been wishing for that to happen? If so, that’s pathetic.

Of course other riders should wait if a rider is assaulted. It should go without saying whatever your views about things like mechanicals that a rider getting hit by some clown is not a racing incident.
 
Re: Re:

Zinoviev Letter said:
Singer01 said:
If, as some people on this forum are definitely hoping for (in fact even stating openly they would get involved in it) Froome was to be interfered with by a spectator, does anybody not think that the racing has to stop while he gets back on? Or is it still a case of 'its a race not a trip to the shops'.

Have people really been wishing for that to happen? If so, that’s pathetic.

Of course other riders should wait if a rider is assaulted. It should go without saying whatever your views about things like mechanicals that a rider getting hit by some clown is not a racing incident.


I think it's more an possibility this could happen and if it does many wouldn't exactly be surprised.
 
Re: Re:

Koronin said:
Zinoviev Letter said:
Singer01 said:
If, as some people on this forum are definitely hoping for (in fact even stating openly they would get involved in it) Froome was to be interfered with by a spectator, does anybody not think that the racing has to stop while he gets back on? Or is it still a case of 'its a race not a trip to the shops'.

Have people really been wishing for that to happen? If so, that’s pathetic.

Of course other riders should wait if a rider is assaulted. It should go without saying whatever your views about things like mechanicals that a rider getting hit by some clown is not a racing incident.


I think it's more an possibility this could happen and if it does many wouldn't exactly be surprised.
There were people in the clinic threatening to do it.
 
Re: Re:

Singer01 said:
Koronin said:
Zinoviev Letter said:
Singer01 said:
If, as some people on this forum are definitely hoping for (in fact even stating openly they would get involved in it) Froome was to be interfered with by a spectator, does anybody not think that the racing has to stop while he gets back on? Or is it still a case of 'its a race not a trip to the shops'.

Have people really been wishing for that to happen? If so, that’s pathetic.

Of course other riders should wait if a rider is assaulted. It should go without saying whatever your views about things like mechanicals that a rider getting hit by some clown is not a racing incident.


I think it's more an possibility this could happen and if it does many wouldn't exactly be surprised.
There were people in the clinic threatening to do it.


Oh, missed that. That isn't good.
 
Re: Re:

Singer01 said:
Koronin said:
Zinoviev Letter said:
Singer01 said:
If, as some people on this forum are definitely hoping for (in fact even stating openly they would get involved in it) Froome was to be interfered with by a spectator, does anybody not think that the racing has to stop while he gets back on? Or is it still a case of 'its a race not a trip to the shops'.

Have people really been wishing for that to happen? If so, that’s pathetic.

Of course other riders should wait if a rider is assaulted. It should go without saying whatever your views about things like mechanicals that a rider getting hit by some clown is not a racing incident.


I think it's more an possibility this could happen and if it does many wouldn't exactly be surprised.
There were people in the clinic threatening to do it.
If that’s the case, that’s not good at all, hope the mods clamp down on it.

As much as I believe Froome is disgracing the sport, I would hope that the other riders would sit up and assist if Froome does get the Merckx treatment.
 
Re: Re:

42x16ss said:
Singer01 said:
Koronin said:
Zinoviev Letter said:
Singer01 said:
If, as some people on this forum are definitely hoping for (in fact even stating openly they would get involved in it) Froome was to be interfered with by a spectator, does anybody not think that the racing has to stop while he gets back on? Or is it still a case of 'its a race not a trip to the shops'.

Have people really been wishing for that to happen? If so, that’s pathetic.

Of course other riders should wait if a rider is assaulted. It should go without saying whatever your views about things like mechanicals that a rider getting hit by some clown is not a racing incident.


I think it's more an possibility this could happen and if it does many wouldn't exactly be surprised.
There were people in the clinic threatening to do it.
If that’s the case, that’s not good at all, hope the mods clamp down on it.

As much as I believe Froome is disgracing the sport, I would hope that the other riders would sit up and assist if Froome does get the Merckx treatment.
How is he disgracing the sport??
 

TRENDING THREADS