Race interference: Protests, Sabotage, and Assaults

Page 4 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Maybe, but the police can't do whatever and then justify itself by saying "they started it mom". If the proposed course of action only makes things worse then it only serves a sadistic urge to see people you disagree with getting hurt
So let me get this straight, I simply turn around your logic that actions have consequences, and you instantaneously start throwing the word 'sadism' around.

So the whole "people you disgree with" seems to be pure projection to me. If anything, you're showing complete tolerance to normally unacceptable behavior simply because you agree with them politically.

Ironic really
 
So let me get this straight, I simply turn around your logic that actions have consequences, and you instantaneously start throwing the word 'sadism' around.

So the whole "people you disgree with" seems to be pure projection to me. If anything, you're showing complete tolerance to normally unacceptable behavior simply because you agree with them politically.

Ironic really
What are you even talking about. I merely said if the police starts beating a large group of determined people right before the peloton rides through they'll only make things worse because A RIOT WILL BREAK OUT THEN AND THERE, then you were like "don't care, want them beaten regardless"
 
Normally the way to go would be a riot breaking out and then people being beaten, not the other way around. I doubt it would be a solution if the Police would just beat anyone who looks suspicious. It would also be highly illegal.
 
What are you even talking about. I merely said if the police starts beating a large group of determined people right before the peloton rides through they'll only make things worse because A RIOT WILL BREAK OUT THEN AND THERE, then you were like "don't care, want them beaten regardless"
Not that RR can't speak for himself, but to state the obvious, he didn't say anything remotely like that.
 
Maybe, but the police can't do whatever and then justify itself by saying "they started it mom". If the proposed course of action only makes things worse then it only serves a sadistic urge to see people you disagree with getting hurt
You don't approach a repeated encounter as if it's a one-off. But yes, the police should have been better prepared so they could more credibly respond with overwhelming force.
 
  • Like
Reactions: joe_papp
In the Tour the french police gives you a whack with their baton if you run to close to the riders. Here the Spanish police doesn't even use them when you're blocking the road...
There was very clear footage of a woman getting a baton thwack on the back of the legs on stage 5 (was it 5? Where there were a few protesters in the road on a corner)
Edit: stage 10
 
Last edited:
It was in reference to today's stage, not yesterday
i-guess-6bbd2dffef9f55a17010b6d8aca89850-meme.jpeg
 
Moderator mode on

For the last time, this thread is about how roadside protests might be handled or avoided. Identifying support for, or opposition to, any particular cause of protest will be considered political discussion, and will draw a ban.
 
Moderator mode on

For the last time, this thread is about how roadside protests might be handled or avoided. Identifying support for, or opposition to, any particular cause of protest will be considered political discussion, and will draw a ban.
IMO, roadside protests are probably best handled by addressing the issue causing them.
 
Not in this forum they are not.

There are countless places on the internet suitable for any of us to express our political positions: this is not one of them.
That post was apolitical. How do you resolve any problem? You address the cause. Of course, if discussion of the cause is off-limits then discussion of the resolution becomes rather pointless. Anyway, I'll let you all have at it, I don't think I can add anything on this thread.
 
Not in this forum they are not.

There are countless places on the internet suitable for any of us to express our political positions: this is not one of them.
It's a political opinion to call something political. "Political" implies that both sides of a debate are valid and that reasonable people could disagree. But clearly there are some debates, such as, "should we enslave Canadians?", that do not fit this description.
 
  • Like
Reactions: the delgados
It's a political opinion to call something political. "Political" implies that both sides of a debate are valid and that reasonable people could disagree. But clearly there are some debates, such as, "should we enslave Canadians?", that do not fit this description.
Any regulation can be undermined by such reductio ad absurdum. This is not legislation that is going to have life changing repercussions, so does not need to be constructed in watertight terms.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

TRENDING THREADS