Sorry I was being facetious about Chapman.
Despite what people say about the British public's interest in cycling, and so the lack of coverage in the mainstream media, Lance is front page news here. I said the British media would go after this and already questions are being directed at Sky. The stark and extreme nature of Lance's cheating, not just the extent of it but his bullying nature, have been a huge talking point. I have read his demeanour and behaviour compared to the mafia the way he has gone after whistle blowers. I have also heard him described as a psychopath. The article I read today said like all bullys he is a coward, because he chose not to defend against the USADA charges.
And they will go after Brailsford too. Barry being one of the 11, Rogers being named by LL, Leinders, Yates, it is all being talked about in the press and Sky will have difficult questions to answer. Their zero-tolerance edict is exposed as a sham, whether it be through stupity and ignorance or more duplicitous means is yet to be decided.
And yes, the British media is a long way from accusing Brailsford and Wiggins of cheating, because that taints British cycling deeply, but they will ask the right questions, and unless those questions are answered thoroughly they will continue. If there is something happening at Sky I do think it will exposed.
That said I don't believe Sky were doing anything like USPS. Rogers has a lot of questions marks, and I'm not certain of Froome, but until I get starker evidence I give them the benefit of the doubt.
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram