Ranking the UWT stage races

As a newcomer, there may already be a thread about this and if so, my apologies and please merge with that but I couldn't find one. I know the monuments and classics are largely considered more prestigous, with the Grand Tours and Worlds obviously ahead as well, but I wanted to talk about the stage races and where they rank. The Major tours are quite clearly the top 7, but where are they individually ranked? And what about the other 5, where are they seen to be after it? I've only been watching cycling for 15 or so years so my experiences will probably be much different to yours but this is the way I see it:

1. Criterium du Dauphine. The Dauphine is the main precurser to the Tour obviously and despite being the second youngest of the 7 it definitely has more prestige than the others in my viewing of cycling, whether or not that holds true across the board I'm not sure. It has big mountains, the views are incredible and it just feels massive in comparison to the rest.

2. Volta Ciclista a Catalunya. Obviously the oldest and it's the first real purely GC test of the year with Tirreno and Paris-Nice having sprint stages littered throughout. It's also often the hardest race to watch as an Aussie (especially when you get up at 5 for work...) but you make the effort a few nights to see how everyone is really shaping up heading into Grand Tour season, so this is an important marker which I really enjoy watching.

3. Paris-Nice. This is the point where I start to debate where to rank these races. It's usually the one where ASO try new things (Like the TTT format) but I still feel like it deserves its spot in this place because it's the first of the tours for a reason, it often has a stage for the sprinters which I feel most of these Tours should but don't necessarily have.

4. Tour de Suisse. 3-5 were the hardest to rank, Suisse is the other one right before the Tour and I feel it should be more recognised despite being next to the Dauphine which is obviously currently #1 in my opinion (and unlikely to change). Maybe it's a touch too close to the Tour in this regard but I still feel that way.

5. Itzulia Basque Country. I know it's had three different names but I'm calling it this. It's got some absolutely brutal climbs usually and a good break in the middle of the Classics season but I also feel it's a little lost because of that too? Not really an early season indicator as most of the favourites here have probably ridden Catalunya, Paris-Nice or Tirreno but also a little far out from the Giro to get a real indication.

6. Tirreno-Adriatico. Surprised I have it ahead of Romandie? Fair enough, it's the one with the most sprints and as such I'm guessing most people probably have it as the bottom of these Major Tours, but I have it highter obviously, as it gives a more balanced week than the others, and loses points for being at the same time as Paris-Nice. Great race usually anyway.

7. Tour de Romandie. Yep, 7th. You don't really see any Giro contenders race it at all, and it's a shame because despite it being 7th, it's still obviously a prestigeous race in its own right. I'm not a fan of how often they have two ITT's in the race (only one since 2019 has had fewer than 2) in a 6 day race, would feel better served if it were only one instead.

8. Tour de Pologne. Obviously the main lead up race between the other GT's and the Vuelta, this race is usually pretty balanced between mountains, ITT and flat so we get the best of all worlds and a good indicator for the last GC of the season for those that rode the Giro, or a good closer for those that rode the Tour.

9. UAE Tour. Had a hard time splitting this and TDU, but the fact is you get to see the likes of Tadej, Roglic, Evenepoel often start their seasons here instead of TDU, as much as I hate that. Usually 7 stages and has an ITT and a couple of mountain stages which bumps it above my home country's race.

10. Tour Down Under. If it had the right profile and length it could easily be above the UAE, I feel like it's one stage short of what it needs to be, and also feel like it needs one less sprint stage. Give it another stage around Mt Lofty as well as WIllunga Hill and maybe add an ITT, either as a prologue or at the end.

11. Gree Tour of Guangxi. I found it tough to rank these last two next to each other but this one at least has a little climbing in it so it makes the GC more interesting than Renewi, and the results are often a surprise, with only Enric Mas so far as a normal GC in GT guy whose won it.

12. Renewi Tour. Yep, Renewi at the bottom, it's not a GC race at all, as shown by the fact you basically just have to be a really be a good ITT rider with one minor "Hilly" stage for you to separate yourself from the rest.

So yeah, there are my rankings. Cheers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pantani_lives
The relative status seems to switch a lot over the years as well depending on how early they are in the year. Paris - Nice is a classic race but since it's so early in the year it has historically been seen more as a kick-off race rather than a highly prestigious race. When I first started following cycling 28 years ago the sentiment was more that Tour de Suisse was the 4th most prestigious stage race after the 3 GTs but that has shifted a bit since then.
 
The relative status seems to switch a lot over the years as well depending on how early they are in the year. Paris - Nice is a classic race but since it's so early in the year it has historically been seen more as a kick-off race rather than a highly prestigious race. When I first started following cycling 28 years ago the sentiment was more that Tour de Suisse was the 4th most prestigious stage race after the 3 GTs but that has shifted a bit since then.
This! TdS was the biggest one week stage race. I don't know how but Dauphiné took his place.

1 -Dauphiné
2 - TdS
3 - PN
4 - Volta a Catalunya
5 - Pais Vasco
6 - TA
7 - Romandie
 
I'd say that Paris-Nice is at the top (it's so important that it often warrants more than one thread). It may be so that Dauphiné has a better start list but its function as a warm-up race is undeniable and I think that takes a bit from its prestige even if the riders present obviously do everything to win when they're there.

Also, definitely Guangxi below Renewi even if the organisers of Renewi do everything they can to make it as dull as possible.
 
I'd say that Paris-Nice is at the top (it's so important that it often warrants more than one thread). It may be so that Dauphiné has a better start list but its function as a warm-up race is undeniable and I think that takes a bit from its prestige even if the riders present obviously do everything to win when they're there.
Yeah, my first thought as well. It's often not the most fun, but in my mind definitely the most prestigious.
 
Paris - Nice

Dauphine
Suisse

Catalunya
Itzulia
Tirreno
Romandie


To me, Paris Nice is clearly the most prestigious right now.
Suisse used to be the biggest by far (close to GT level actually) but it's fallen a lot in the last 2 decades given that it has become unpopular as a Tour prep and is otherwise in the middle of nowhere for riders that don't do the Tour. I'll still group it just behind Dauphine due to its history but you could easily put it in the third group.

Catalunya, Itzulia, Tirreno and Romandie are basically on the same level. If we're going by race design attractiveness and starting field Tirreno and Itzulia beat the others in the last decade and Romandie comes clearly last. But I don't think any rider makes a big distinction between winning one of these four over the others.

UAE Tour, Cologne, Guanxi or Down Under definitely don't deserve to be mentioned anywhere near these big 7 and just show that the "World Tour" status is just a meaningless UCI category creation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gratemans
I don't think anyone considers Rund um Köln a major stage race ;)

Romandie clearly bottom of the big 7 right now, UAE Tour sadly clearly best of the rest. The other WT stage races are not even ahead of the likes of Algarve.

Otherwise I think people are going off very recent trends too much. Yes, Paris-Nice had a far better startlist than Tirreno this year, but it's only four years ago where Tirreno had the most star-studded field I've ever seen and Paris-Nice was basically Roglic and a few second-tier-at-best riders. Yet multiple people are putting four races between them, that's excessive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Red Rick
And while we're on the subject of Romandie: I think it might be better off if it was moved into a pre-Vuelta slot. Would also be much more suitable weather-wise and create a better spread of the bigger stage races, which like the classics are too heavily slanted towards the first half of the season.
 
Otherwise I think people are going off very recent trends too much. Yes, Paris-Nice had a far better startlist than Tirreno this year, but it's only four years ago where Tirreno had the most star-studded field I've ever seen and Paris-Nice was basically Roglic and a few second-tier-at-best riders. Yet multiple people are putting four races between them, that's excessive.
Before 2013, the difference between the two were even greater. So I could also say that a few years between then and now where TA seemed at least as prestigious is the very recent trend that you go off of too much ;)
 
A follow up to this question. Since there is such a gap after the top 7 one week races.

Which is the most prestigious 2.PS race and where would it fit among the WT stage races?
I bet something at least beats Guangxi.
 
Dauphiné needs to be near the top but putting it at I'm a bit iffy on, largely since ASO took it over and it went through a stint of being essentially an extended Tour visua with UCI points, thinking of things like spoiling the unveiling of new or long-forgotten climbs like Mont du Chat by including them immediately before their appearance in the Tour, and including a carbon copy of the Tour TT in 2011.

Paris-Nice needs to be near the top too, due to its standalone role as essentially the stage racing equivalent of Omloop; any stage race before Paris-Nice is a pre-season tune-up, but after Paris-Nice, the season has begun in earnest. Far more people come to Paris-Nice as a major target than do so the Dauphiné or the Tour de Suisse, as these being shortly before the Tour or shortly after the Giro usually means they are used either to build form or to capitalise on form before a break, whereas Paris-Nice being the first real chance to put a meaningful marker down for the season raises its importance.

Suisse is extremely historic and has a highly prestigious win list, but it did suffer a bit for ASO's work on the Dauphiné, making it the Tour recce of choice, which reduced the field at Suisse for a bit. I also highly resent the 2009 route to this day as unbecoming of a race of the history and prestige of the Tour de Suisse, as bad as anything the Giro did for Moser.

Catalunya is extremely historic, but it has also fluctuated in value and been shuffled around the calendar a lot, I would contest that it belongs somewhere in the midfield despite its strong fields in recent years (having big names show up is one thing, having them targeting your race as a major goal is another), and amongst the Spanish races Itzulia is actually more important than it, and is one of the most important stage races - but while at times I would contest it merits discussion alongside Suisse, Dauphiné and Paris-Nice on a palmarès, it is the only one of the four I wouldn't contest has a case to be the most important. It is, however, the most unique, with its own characteristics given by the nature of the climbing being very different from the big Alpine and Pyrenean ascents.

After those four, probably Tirreno-Adriatico belongs next, although again I'm a little iffy because it has fluctuated a bit in character. For me the race of two seas should be about the little walls of the Marche and not a petit-GT; it being a Milano-Sanremo prep means they like long stages and short hills, but they and Paris-Nice did flip-flop their styles for a little bit in the 2010s. Romandie also fluctuates in value for me - during eras where the big GT favourites are also contending in the Ardennes, its calendar spot makes it an afterthought for them, but when they are not, it is the strongest stage race at that point in the calendar. Therefore for much of the 2000s and early 2010s with the likes of the Schlecks, Cunego, Valverde, Rodríguez, Sánchez, Evans and di Luca doing the Ardennes, it was a relatively less important race than in the mid-2010s when it has one of the strongest stage racing fields of any race outside the GTs, with the likes of Froome, Quintana, Pinot, Porte, Bardet, Zakarin, Dumoulin and van Garderen regularly on the startline.

The other races belong in their own category of "lesser" WT races. Pologne is at least historic and the biggest race in its area, but most of its history being amateur and a less-than-optimal calendar spot as well as the geography of Poland meaning a lot of long and not especially interesting (and oftentimes unreasonably dangerous) sprint stages harm its prestige; (Insert Sponsor Here) Tour of the Bene(not Lux as it's never been there) is just "a stage race in Belgium and the Netherlands" that, aside from the WT status, doesn't offer much different from a dozen other races in an area where it is months removed from the most important races in that part of the world.

TDU, UAE Tour and Tour of Guangxi are just bookends to the season. UAE is pre-Paris-Nice, so it's a prep race. Guangxi is post-Lombardia, so it's a wind-down race. TDU has actually been doing a good job in the last 10 years or so of improving its parcours and making more interesting races, but the fact it's so geographically and chronologically distant from the rest of the calendar means apart from the locals, nobody's ever peaking for it, it's on in the middle of the night for the largest part of the cycling fanbase (while it is improving its global outreach, the fact remains that the lion's share of the audience is in Europe) and much of the péloton treat it as warm weather miles logged. Again, I think the organisers have done a good job coaxing some more interesting racing out of the field in recent years, but the calendar spot is a double-edged sword; if they ran in a better calendar spot, the field would drastically drop away due to the travel in proximity to other season's goals, but as long as they're in such an isolated calendar spot, they'll never be a target race that can grow in prestige to compete with the higher level of WT races.
 
A follow up to this question. Since there is such a gap after the top 7 one week races.

Which is the most prestigious 2.PS race and where would it fit among the WT stage races? I bet something at least beats Guangxi.
Alps/Trentino as biggest Giro prep race; Burgos as biggest Vuelta prep race; Tour of Belgium and Tour de Luxembourg for history; Quatre Jours de Dunkerque for personal favour.

I'd rank all of these above Guangxi. Alps/Trentino and Burgos I'd probably rate over UAE too.