Went with 3.
Stage by stage:
1) TTT. I don't like TTTs, but it's at least an OK length in a nice city.
2) Look at all that lovely intermediate stage terrain between Pamplona and Viana not being used, or the hills of the GP Miguel Indurain. Sad.
3) How can you screw up the run-in to Eibar that badly? No Karabieta? Really? If they're just going to go over through Elorrio and round by Durango and Ermua, they may as well just go up Urkiola and finish there, since it's harder than Arrate.
4) This one came straight out of the Tour de Suisse 2009. Valdezcaray is not hard enough on its own to be anything other than a 20 man sprint at best.
5) No Riojan mountains at all? Just a circuit race? Really?
6) Actually not too bad, would have preferred a couple of more climbs earlier in the stage, but I'll take what I can get from this route.
7) Generic, meaningless flat stage, motor racing finish, seems popular in Spain at the moment.
8) At least the finishing climb is fairly steep, but could they seriously not include Ordino, La Rabassa or something else to make it a bit tougher and encourage somebody to make a move with more than 7km to go? Or to mean that any attacks inside of 7km to go are more likely to stick?
9) Too flat for the final vague uphill to be of any importance. If we're lucky, it'll be like the Suancés stage in 2008 that Bettini won. Not worthy of a weekend stage at all.
10) Joke.
11) I actually rather like this. Should perhaps be a bit longer (or at least be accompanied by a second TT of the same or longer length), but not a totally easy time trial but still one that favours the strongman.
12) Really ridiculously poor stage plan. The final climb could be quite good but the stage leading up to it will be laughably bad unless the wind is strong.
13) Useless again.
14) Don't mind this at all. Lots of climbs, although it could easily be much tougher than it is. At least the final climb here should be decisive and gaps can and should be created, and legs will be tired.
15) Actually a tougher lead-in to Covadonga than I expected but still, all about the final climb and nothing else.
16) The false flat between Cobertoria and Cuitu Negru isn't quite as bad as I thought, but this will still be about the last few kilometres. At least the legs will be tired by the rest of the stage and the gaps should be decent.
17) Both overkill and utterly pointless; not steep or hard enough to create difficulties. Seems like the Peio Terme stage in the 2010 Giro. So many options for short mountaintops, steep short finishes (Santo Toribio?) or descent finishes in the area, it's a letdown.
18) Total waste of a day.
19) Likewise. Really? No ITT here?
20) This I like. It will probably be all about Bola again, but at least they've made it a proper hard stage before then.
21) Ceremonial.
Overall, I think there are some OK stages there, but none that make me excited for the Vuelta, and I'm one of the race's biggest defenders here. I like the race and think it gets some really undeserved bad press. But it's not helping itself. It's like the organisers recognised that in the last couple of years almost the only meaningful gaps have been created on MTFs, and that those gaps have been pretty small, and have therefore made the equation that "more MTFs creating those small gaps = bigger gaps and more stages with gaps, therefore more MTFs = good" without stopping to think that the reason behind those small gaps is that all too often the MTF stages are simply not tough enough to break the péloton apart until they get to the final climb, and none of the contenders are worn down enough to collapse big style.
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram