Rate the 2015 Ronde van Vlaanderen

rate!

  • 5

    Votes: 7 9.3%
  • 4

    Votes: 6 8.0%
  • 3

    Votes: 7 9.3%
  • 2

    Votes: 3 4.0%
  • 1

    Votes: 1 1.3%
  • 10

    Votes: 2 2.7%
  • 9

    Votes: 3 4.0%
  • 8

    Votes: 8 10.7%
  • 7

    Votes: 18 24.0%
  • 6

    Votes: 20 26.7%

  • Total voters
    75
  • Poll closed .
Feb 24, 2014
15,228
3,122
28,180
10 for Kristoff.
2-3 for the race overall.
The route needs a change.
Kwaremont and Paterberg should keep more important role than on the old, Kapelmuur - Bosberg, parcourse, but shouldn't lock the race.
It won't be easy to create something between, but the organizer have had their three years of increased profit, so they should try hard.
 
Nov 7, 2010
8,820
246
17,880
Re:

Dekker_Tifosi said:
a 6, because of the final 30km

a 2 for the first 230km, an 8,5 for the final 30

A 5 from me.

Great ride from Kristoff, but the first 220km were dull and the race was basically all over once Kristoff got the 30 second lead coming into the Kwaremont. I think it really missed Boonen and Cancellara - two real winners who would have been more prepared to take big risks to get 1st.
 
Jan 26, 2014
1,053
81
10,580
it was okay but the coverage was bad. They dont even know if Sep was dropped or was launching the chase
 
Feb 18, 2015
13,828
9,830
28,180
I really really enjoyed the race so I gave it a 9. The main reason for that is probably that I didn't see the first 200 km
 
Feb 20, 2012
54,081
44,444
28,180
5, only cool thing that happened was the deciding breakaway, after the Pater the race was decided
 
Jan 27, 2012
15,268
2,660
28,180
Mediocre edition.
RVV should offer much more action and drama.
Still Terpstra and Kristoff (with GVA) managed to make the finale entertaining.

6.
 
Jul 11, 2013
3,340
0
0
The last 40-50 km was okay but I cannot help to compare with the epic gent wevelgem so have to give it 4 (fair or not)..

Sky were strong but their defensive (haul in every interesting move/deter others from trying something) riding kind of ruined the oppertunity to open up the race earlier on..

I would have preferred some more chaos (apart from Shimano service car fail)...
 
Jul 1, 2013
1,952
0
0
10 for kristoff. 1 for rest of race. Sick of hearing about Sky's new bike on commentary. Like Big Wigg said, Its a game changer. Unfortunately neither the bike or him changed a thing.
 
Apr 15, 2014
4,254
2,341
18,680
6.5/10

First part was too much passive racing, which was mainly caused by Sky and Quickstep tactics. They both stiffled early initiative. Kristoff rode fantastically, smart and strong. Van Avermaet & Sagan raced with real passion. Kudos also to Benoot.

Edit: And also big shout for Greipel!
 
Sep 8, 2009
15,306
3
22,485
guys i hope you realize that the epic gent wevelgem occurs only once in 40-50 years. stop comparing race to it plz
 
Apr 12, 2009
2,364
0
0
A 8. Easily one of the best RvVs of the last decade. I have no idea where this negativity is coming from?
Is this the same forum that likes boring MTF stages, or LBLs etc.
Edit: but there's no RvV of this decade that I'd rate lower than a 7 (there's only one i've seen live that was actually rather boring)
 
Feb 10, 2015
5,939
817
19,680
Hard to rate.

Team Sky destroyed the race with their boring style until the Taaienberg. Nice finale, thanks to the winning move. 5/10.
 
Jul 25, 2012
12,967
1,970
25,680
The route kills it and I stopped watching as soon as Terpstra and Kristoff had 20+ seconds, only to look up and watch Kristoff take an easy win. But I enjoyed the race a fair bit up until that part. 7.
 

zlev11

BANNED
Jan 23, 2011
2,734
3,146
17,180
7/10, but this race really needs to go back to the normal route. maybe this route could work if people truly raced from the Koppenberg to the end like last year, but more often than not it won't happen.