• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Rate the 2015 Ronde van Vlaanderen

rate!

  • 5

    Votes: 7 9.3%
  • 4

    Votes: 6 8.0%
  • 3

    Votes: 7 9.3%
  • 2

    Votes: 3 4.0%
  • 1

    Votes: 1 1.3%
  • 10

    Votes: 2 2.7%
  • 9

    Votes: 3 4.0%
  • 8

    Votes: 8 10.7%
  • 7

    Votes: 18 24.0%
  • 6

    Votes: 20 26.7%

  • Total voters
    75
  • Poll closed .
10 for Kristoff.
2-3 for the race overall.
The route needs a change.
Kwaremont and Paterberg should keep more important role than on the old, Kapelmuur - Bosberg, parcourse, but shouldn't lock the race.
It won't be easy to create something between, but the organizer have had their three years of increased profit, so they should try hard.
 
Re:

Dekker_Tifosi said:
a 6, because of the final 30km

a 2 for the first 230km, an 8,5 for the final 30

A 5 from me.

Great ride from Kristoff, but the first 220km were dull and the race was basically all over once Kristoff got the 30 second lead coming into the Kwaremont. I think it really missed Boonen and Cancellara - two real winners who would have been more prepared to take big risks to get 1st.
 
Jul 11, 2013
3,340
0
0
The last 40-50 km was okay but I cannot help to compare with the epic gent wevelgem so have to give it 4 (fair or not)..

Sky were strong but their defensive (haul in every interesting move/deter others from trying something) riding kind of ruined the oppertunity to open up the race earlier on..

I would have preferred some more chaos (apart from Shimano service car fail)...
 
Jul 1, 2013
1,952
0
0
10 for kristoff. 1 for rest of race. Sick of hearing about Sky's new bike on commentary. Like Big Wigg said, Its a game changer. Unfortunately neither the bike or him changed a thing.
 
6.5/10

First part was too much passive racing, which was mainly caused by Sky and Quickstep tactics. They both stiffled early initiative. Kristoff rode fantastically, smart and strong. Van Avermaet & Sagan raced with real passion. Kudos also to Benoot.

Edit: And also big shout for Greipel!
 
Apr 12, 2009
2,364
0
0
A 8. Easily one of the best RvVs of the last decade. I have no idea where this negativity is coming from?
Is this the same forum that likes boring MTF stages, or LBLs etc.
Edit: but there's no RvV of this decade that I'd rate lower than a 7 (there's only one i've seen live that was actually rather boring)
 
7/10, but this race really needs to go back to the normal route. maybe this route could work if people truly raced from the Koppenberg to the end like last year, but more often than not it won't happen.