The traditional poll. I was not sure whether to do just the men's race or overall, but I decided overall, as it is a week long competition.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Seems like some of the comments/ratings reflect that only the RR has been considered, which was not the intention.Brullnux said:The traditional poll. I was not sure whether to do just the men's race or overall, but I decided overall, as it is a week long competition.
I don't mind, I imagined this would happen. People can interpret the question as they wish.Cance > TheRest said:Seems like some of the comments/ratings reflect that only the RR has been considered, which was not the intention.Brullnux said:The traditional poll. I was not sure whether to do just the men's race or overall, but I decided overall, as it is a week long competition.
I can't say it was very predictable when at the last Km we could have had a group, Alaphilippe alone or Alaphilippe and Moscon. Add some rain and we would have been here talking about how great the course wasValv.Piti said:4. Predictable it would come down to the last lap and the coverage was poor in the end and I don't really like that Sagan won for the 3rd time. GVA, Gilbert, Kwito etc. disappointed me.
Smartest and strongest. He covered 2 attacks in the last 3 km. You wouldn't see Kristoff or Matthews doing that.Mayomaniac said:4 or 5, voted 5. boring race, last lap was good, Sagan was the smartest and deserves respect, but you don't see people praising Gerrans for being the smartest when he won 2 Monuments.
Overall The TTs where good, the RR circuit was what it was and only bad weather could create a great race.
He did it in great style. Look what Freire did on the last hill when Ivan Basso tried to attack: that Freire was a monster! Anyway, Sagan has been great as well today!movingtarget said:I gave it a 6. Not a great race but to do a triple Worlds is a big feat no matter how it was done. Oscar Freire did the same and most cycling critics raved about him.
I hope as well they are going to come back just change slightly the course. With the finish line closer to Salmon Hill it would have been very interestingAxel Hangleck said:Overall I gave it an 8; but might have rated it higher but the men's race was a bit underwhelming & the coverage cutting out at a vital time. Great venue, scenery, crowds, enthusiasm, etc
If i was the UCI I'd be wanting to go back as I thought it showed the sport in a good light...