- Jul 16, 2010
- 17,455
- 5
- 0
Angliru said:Are you purposely ignoring the reason for my referencing that particular Tour stage's result or is it that you can't take my inference that Gilbert's dominance actually has an expiration date?![]()
A stage in a Tour is something different than a one day race. Never mind he already won every single race he entered since Brabantse Pijl till the first stage of the Tour. It's called not being in your best shape anymore after a long peak. Don't start whining when someone disagrees with your nonsense. You said dominance was short lived, yet it isn't with most dominant cyclists. A period of around 5 years. Is that short lived? Sorry that I use evidence to back up my arguments.
Cancellara's and Boonen's dominance wasn't short lived. While you used them as an evidence to say it was. Besides, Cancellara was pretty dominant this year as well in the cobbles
I was only talking about the part of your post I disagreed with. But hey, if I also have to debunk your reference to a particular Tour stage, I'll bite. Being dominant is not the same as being unbeatable(as Cancellara proved this year). Someone who is really unbeatable obviously doesn't exist. Though I never said Phil was unbeatable.