john_d said:
Sometimes opinions get in the way of the facts ...
Bernard Hinalult
1982
Tour de France
1st place overall classification
Winner prologue, stages 15, 20 and 22
12 days in yellow jersey
Giro d'Italia
1st place overall classification
Winner prologue, stages 3, 12, 18, 22
15 days in pink jersey
1985
Tour de France
1st place overall classification
Winner prologue, stage 8
16 days in yellow jersey
Giro d'Italia
1st place overall classification
Winner stage 12
10 days in pink jersey
However on this case, facts escape people. Namely you. Notice how you had to go back to 1985?
There are two things you're missing.
A. Riders' training wasn't as targeted as it was now. Now you have to be in tip top condition at both to win both. Back then, that wasn't the case.
The transition is most evident in the early nineties. By the start of Induráin's reign he was doing the Giro-Tour double. Later he was doing it at a severe cost to his reserves. Later still, he was not hitting top form at the Giro. By the end, he was skipping the Giro completely.
This is the part where you're probably going to quote Pantani winning both.....but had it not been for a random collapse by Ullrich, he wouldn't have won the Tour, and had it not been for Festina screwing up Zülle's doping programme, he wouldn't have won the Giro. So under normal circumstances he wouldn't have won either.
B. What was Hinault the master of? That's right, the chrono. How were the Giro routes in the early eighties? flat. There was usually one, sometimes two mountain stages. Usually limited to one major climb per stage. This was so that riders such as Moser and Saronni would win.
Next time, try not to answer me back like that. Respect would've been nice on your part......especially considering you were missing obvious facts
blackcat said:
disagree with Devolder. As is, yes you are right. But Armstrong said he could win the Tour.
Makes me think, Armstrong knows how much the recovery and transfusion program can give, in conjuntion with Ferrari
This would be the Armstrong that regularly when asked on this or that riders' performance (Kohl for example), has remarked he doesn't even know the rider in question?
Frosty said:
Is there a link for this?
I remember someone commenting on how some riders' values had dropped back to normal levels and their performances had become ordinary but i didnt realise he had named names?
That's the occasion allright
He was asked if Cunego was one of the targetted riders. At the time, a few different outlets (I remember euronews did so) reported he had smiled back to the question and answered back, not saying the name Cunego, but clearly refering to the question just asked that "some riders'" blood values went back to normal as soon as the riders were warned......"even if their performances did the opposite" (this is an exact quote as I remember it)