I have always been intereted in Kelly's win in the 1988 Vuelta, because even though he started out as a sprinter, he could obviously climb as well (like winning Liege, Paris-Nice 7 times etc.). I know he has been described as an 'all-rounder', but you have to climb pretty darn well to win a GT and win by 1min 27.
So what do people know about the race? Was the course not that hard in terms of mountains or was the field not that strong and indeed how good to the point was Kelly as a rider? I know he is an all-time great, but he raced really before my time so I could hardly have watched him race (I wasn't yet 3 years old when he won the Vuelta). Would any riders in the today's peloton have similar attributes as Kelly?
So what do people know about the race? Was the course not that hard in terms of mountains or was the field not that strong and indeed how good to the point was Kelly as a rider? I know he is an all-time great, but he raced really before my time so I could hardly have watched him race (I wasn't yet 3 years old when he won the Vuelta). Would any riders in the today's peloton have similar attributes as Kelly?