http://www.cyclingweekly.co.uk/news/latest/397436/shimano-gets-tough-on-dopers.html
It seems a bit weird a gruppo manufacturer cracking down on doping but i applaud them. It says in the article that is what brought on by Euskaltel's position on Astaloza.
I especially like the bolded part, even though i don't believe it will do anything, it would be good to see them dump a team on their arse's and then see if SRAM or Campagnolo would have enough balls to sponsor them.
Regarding this point i just made above, i also want to something cleared up and would like an answer to this question:
Am i right in saying even though many teams ride shim this policy will only be enforced by teams that are personally sponsored by shim? ie. Euskaltel, Skil, Rabo(?), Columbia(?) and not others ie. Cervelo, Fdj(?), Garmin(?) etc
It seems a bit weird a gruppo manufacturer cracking down on doping but i applaud them. It says in the article that is what brought on by Euskaltel's position on Astaloza.
Exert from article said:Basic guidelines in Shimano's anti doping policy:
•]If the team management of one of our sponsored teams (no matter in which cycling discipline) is involved in any doping affair, we will stop our sponsorship of this team immediately[/B]
• If an individual rider is involved in any doping affair without the knowledge of the team management, the team will be given the chance to give a clear explanation and a future improvement & control plan to Shimano, upon that it will be decided to continue the sponsoring or not. If another doping incident occurs within the same team, we will keep the option of terminating our sponsorship contract
• Terminating a sponsorship contract means return of all Shimano materials or other contributions that have been supplied to the concerned team immediately.
This anti doping policy is already stated in our ongoing sponsorship contracts but Shimano feels it is valuable to emphasize this ones more to make it clear for everybody what is our opinion about the use of doping in sport. For all our future sponsorship negotiations it is essential for us that the teams show us their anti doping policy in advance.
Shimano Inc.
I especially like the bolded part, even though i don't believe it will do anything, it would be good to see them dump a team on their arse's and then see if SRAM or Campagnolo would have enough balls to sponsor them.
Regarding this point i just made above, i also want to something cleared up and would like an answer to this question:
Am i right in saying even though many teams ride shim this policy will only be enforced by teams that are personally sponsored by shim? ie. Euskaltel, Skil, Rabo(?), Columbia(?) and not others ie. Cervelo, Fdj(?), Garmin(?) etc