The Hitch said:
You mean like when he finished with the elite group on la farrapona, (Despite domestiquing) again on Angliru the day after (despite domestiquing and being held back) and then won on Pena cabarga 2 days later.
Or maybe you mean like the alpes in the 2012 tour when he won 1stage, led home tiny groups of heads of state in the next 2 then had the energy to podium the tt (despite aerodynamic handicapped).
I dont like to use argument of weak field,but in this case its clear reason,In those races there was nobody anywhere near to Quintana climbing,so Froome was by far the best climber in those races (ohh Cobo

).As a result he could do almost everything what he wanted with this bad field.
Or you mean like the dauphine last year when be dropped everyone 2 mountain stages in a row?
I dont want to be rude,but are you serious?There was worse field than in those 2 GT mentioned.Oh I forgot Contador who all winter was flying across Europe with Tinkoff and almost forgot what the bike looks like.
Oh, all that doesn't count, because after being beaten stage after stage by froome for 2 and a half weeks of the 2013 tour Quintana put together 2 results-
2 results, over 3 days when froome was already counting his prize money cos he had a 7 min gap, and that proves Quintana can ride multiple stages and froome can't and therefore Quintana is the best climber?
You know what Quintana did on Ax3 and Ventoux,so dont try to confuse me.
bolded: Froome was there for humiliating every cyclist on french roads in July,so he wasnt counting his money at all.Maybe I give you that he was a bit unmotivated on last 1 km of Semnoz when Purito attacked him,but nothing more.
So to your last question: Yes.
