Stefan Denifl

Page 2 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
May 15, 2011
45,171
617
24,680
Seems Groupama's Preidler is another rider involved ... Admits he had blood taken but never reinfused
 
May 3, 2015
4,833
4,404
21,180
Oh no, i really like Preidler. Elite sport is rotten. Its really not like Preidler did something extraordinary, especially considering he definitely showed promise for more as a junior...
 
May 15, 2011
45,171
617
24,680
Re:

ppanther92 said:
Oh no, i really like Preidler. Elite sport is rotten. Its really not like Preidler did something extraordinary, especially considering he definitely showed promise for more as a junior...
Yeah, if riders like him are blood doping, why should we believe the big guys are clean?
 
Aug 29, 2009
7,879
7,072
23,180
it's only a shortened version though. I think you get a bit of a different impression reading the full one (in the newspaper)
 
Feb 18, 2015
13,820
9,810
28,180
Of course he claims to never have actually doped but let's be real, he did that to not lose his results and no way he would have come out like this if he had never actually done anything wrong.
On another note, Austrian cycling is f*cked
 
Gigs_98 said:
Of course he claims to never have actually doped but let's be real, he did that to not lose his results and no way he would have come out like this if he had never actually done anything wrong.
On another note, Austrian cycling is f*cked

Yup, the end of austrian cycling for good it seems.
 
Feb 18, 2015
13,820
9,810
28,180
Serpentin said:
Gigs_98 said:
Of course he claims to never have actually doped but let's be real, he did that to not lose his results and no way he would have come out like this if he had never actually done anything wrong.
On another note, Austrian cycling is f*cked

Yup, the end of austrian cycling for good it seems.
Very curious if there are any bora links as so many Austrians ride for them.
 
May 10, 2017
227
3
1,835
I hope the implications of this does not impact the Tirol-KTM team, would be a shame to see U23s out on the street.
 
Jul 3, 2009
18,948
5
22,485
Hopefully not, and hopefully old Totschnig didn't show too many youngsters how the world worked when he was running the show.
 
Mar 14, 2009
3,436
0
0
Re:

TourOfSardinia said:
Fanboy mode:
So does this add another win to Alberto's palmares?

So one convicted doper gets stripped of his win in favor of another convicted doper.

Priceless ... only possible in cycling :cool:
 
Apr 16, 2009
17,600
6,854
28,180
Re: Re:

Jancouver said:
TourOfSardinia said:
Fanboy mode:
So does this add another win to Alberto's palmares?

So one convicted doper gets stripped of his win in favor of another convicted doper.

Priceless ... only possible in cycling :cool:
Remember when Ekimov was complaining that he was being robbed when Hamilton was caught for doping?
That was the worst!
 
Apr 16, 2009
17,600
6,854
28,180
Preidler is saying that it was an attempt to transfuse blood. That he never actually did it. I am not sure what is the difference in the eyes of the UCI. Maybe a lessen ban. But I don't believe that for a second.

Maybe is time to open a new thread about the Doctor ring! (like we did with Fuentes).
 
Jul 15, 2013
896
0
4,580
Re: Re:

Escarabajo said:
Jancouver said:
TourOfSardinia said:
Fanboy mode:
So does this add another win to Alberto's palmares?

So one convicted doper gets stripped of his win in favor of another convicted doper.

Priceless ... only possible in cycling :cool:
Remember when Ekimov was complaining that he was being robbed when Hamilton was caught for doping?
That was the worst!
Remember when Ullrich's last results were voided, awarding wins to Julich and Koldo Gil
 
Aug 29, 2009
7,879
7,072
23,180
Re:

Escarabajo said:
Preidler is saying that it was an attempt to transfuse blood. That he never actually did it. I am not sure what is the difference in the eyes of the UCI. Maybe a lessen ban. But I don't believe that for a second.

Maybe is time to open a new thread about the Doctor ring! (like we did with Fuentes).

in the interview Preidler mentions that it means the end of his career anyway, no matter the length of the ban (which is likely to be still 4 years by the way. There's the same penalty for "use" and "attempted use", afaik. And he clearly confessed the attempt.)

So if he indeed didn't tell the whole truth, it probably was not to get a shorter ban
 
Jul 10, 2012
2,212
1,971
14,680
Re: Re:

Jancouver said:
TourOfSardinia said:
Fanboy mode:
So does this add another win to Alberto's palmares?

So one convicted doper gets stripped of his win in favor of another convicted doper.

Priceless ... only possible in cycling :cool:
tru, bc athletes are rarely penalized in other sports
 
Mar 4, 2011
8,426
11,151
23,180
Re: Re:

Jancouver said:
TourOfSardinia said:
Fanboy mode:
So does this add another win to Alberto's palmares?

So one convicted doper gets stripped of his win in favor of another convicted doper.

Priceless ... only possible in cycling :cool:

Oh, not at all just cycling; Ben Johnson's gold medal went to . . . Carl Lewis (that race was one of the clearest cases of the entire field being doped).
 
Apr 7, 2011
4,886
439
16,580
Jörg Werner, manager of Kittel, Degenkolb and Martin, admitts that he has been a regular attendant at Schmidt's practise in Erfurt. However, he insists that it was only for his own regular personal treatment.
 
Jun 24, 2017
1,619
320
11,180
Comment by Marcel Kittel on the case:
https://www.marcelkittel.de/en/
Gist of it: Shocked by the revelations that Schmidt still was part of doping programm in cycling and that he apparently purchased doping equipment from Stefan Matschiner who had just been busted before. Also shocked that his home town Erfurt is in the centre of investigations. Mentions his UV-treatment and how young athletes should be extremely careful as to who they trust.
 
May 5, 2010
51,686
30,231
28,180
Re: Re:

search said:
Escarabajo said:
Preidler is saying that it was an attempt to transfuse blood. That he never actually did it. I am not sure what is the difference in the eyes of the UCI. Maybe a lessen ban. But I don't believe that for a second.

Maybe is time to open a new thread about the Doctor ring! (like we did with Fuentes).

in the interview Preidler mentions that it means the end of his career anyway, no matter the length of the ban (which is likely to be still 4 years by the way. There's the same penalty for "use" and "attempted use", afaik. And he clearly confessed the attempt.)

So if he indeed didn't tell the whole truth, it probably was not to get a shorter ban

Personal reasons? He's 28, so if he gets a four-year ban he'd ben 32 by the time the ban is over. Certainly wouldn't be the first to return from a ban at that age.
 
Oct 5, 2011
1,103
504
12,080
Re: Re:

RedheadDane said:
search said:
Escarabajo said:
Preidler is saying that it was an attempt to transfuse blood. That he never actually did it. I am not sure what is the difference in the eyes of the UCI. Maybe a lessen ban. But I don't believe that for a second.

Maybe is time to open a new thread about the Doctor ring! (like we did with Fuentes).

in the interview Preidler mentions that it means the end of his career anyway, no matter the length of the ban (which is likely to be still 4 years by the way. There's the same penalty for "use" and "attempted use", afaik. And he clearly confessed the attempt.)

So if he indeed didn't tell the whole truth, it probably was not to get a shorter ban

Personal reasons? He's 28, so if he gets a four-year ban he'd ben 32 by the time the ban is over. Certainly wouldn't be the first to return from a ban at that age.

I guess it's not everyones cup of tea to come back and face all those people you betrayed. And then there also is the press. Hope he stays away for ever.