Wellens crashed (maybe even the same crash as Narvaez?) before TV started. That's as far as I could make up from the commentators and some online sources. He already crashed quite hard in RVV and was riding with a fractured rib.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It has been like 3 days since I visited this topic and I felt like I had to read a whole chapter of a book!
In short, I think Pog lost mainly because of wrong choices.
It took him making the wrong choice of following Alaphilippe. It also took a chase group that wasn't cooked by Pogs attack, simply because nobody followed Alaphilippe / Pog when they went clear (for reasons I don't understand: weren't they able or were they just very cold-blooded, or were they (most likely) seeing Pog go and thinking: don't follow this, it's suicide).
So for once, there was the ideal scenario (for the chasers) of Pog going early, on a parcours with a lot of headwind, and behind a strong group with some domestiques, not enough UAE riders to jump on attacks, and ofcourse a very dedicated chase by a strong duo. Pog still had a very fine sprint, but that sprint was lost because of wrong timing (started too early by Remco, so both Remco and Pog had to go early with some headwind).
So all the stars aligned for Skjelmose to win the race (he didn't steal it: he probably gave his very best chasing with Remco which most would consider suicide, so he was brave and willing to go all in).
Just saying that everything was close to perfect in terms of wearing Pog down, chasing Pog, and that sprint.
And still, Pog nearly won. He was the fastest on most of the key climbs. So I would say he's still the outright favourite in LBL. Remco is in fine form, but unless his early crash took much out of him and he that sharp attack uphill like on Redoute when he won Liege, I can't see Remco matching a serious (and this time better-timed) Pog attack. If Pog attacks on Roche-au-Faucons it's a done deal imho.