I'm saying you feel attacked because your way of conversation comes of very defensive.
It's not an argument only against Pog. We've had the same arguments against Remco and WVA. When a rider is much stronger than others, and he wins with ease, people just say the field wasn't that strong. That the top competitors weren't there. Which is the case here.
Well, people could be wrong when they say that about Remco and WVA.
Now it feels like you and others are saying this, because you hold some type of grudge against people that have said this about the rider you have as your avatar. Who is the one feeling attacked or taking this very personal? Who is the one being defensive?
That some great riders werent in the race, doesnt mean the field is automatically "weak". Especially not when it contains a few monument winners and another GT-winner. Many experienced riders, who has had great results. A bunch of great young riders, who are deemed to be great talents as well. It is not a weak field, just because one rider is one of the best we have ever seen and some other great riders were missing. It is only a "strong" field when those handful of riders are all at the same time participating? Where is the logic in that?
Many of the riders in the race yesterday has had a very good spring and won big races, but you still wanna claim it was a "weak" field? The only races that will have a "better" field are the five monuments, worlds and the TdF.
No other race can claim to have a "good" field then?
That just wasnt the case here. It was a good WT-race, with many good riders. The main favorite won because he was the best, but it is not like it was a training ride. Look at the gaps. Look at how many didnt finish. It wasnt an easy race at all. Anyone claiming something else needs to get a grip, to put it frankly. Everything else could be discussed in another part of the forum.