Fishermen more likely...Some say Teddy wins races against farmers so maybe it wasn't different with Eddy
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Fishermen more likely...Some say Teddy wins races against farmers so maybe it wasn't different with Eddy
Hilarious! Mou is an hell of a characterHis two most recent tweets are indeed about Ayuso:
I love some mou hahahaHilarious! Mou is an hell of a character
Ayuso should leave the team. What an arrogant person.The Quebec/Montreal team. Ayuso not looking as pleased.
Miss my alpha trollI love some mou hahaha
Pogacar should demand UAE to dump him asap.Ayuso should leave the team. What an arrogant person.
GOAT GOAT GOATWait is over, GOAT is back on the menu!!!
If we go by that logic of "farmers" in Merckx era, then we can say the same about this era.I find it extremely disrespectful to the other riders from that era as well as Merckx to just go with the narrative that Merckx was the only good rider against farmers.
If we go by that logic of "farmers" in Merckx era, then we can say the same about this era.
This era is basically 3/4 riders above everybody, and the rest is farmers.
What is the name of the guys Pogacar beat in strade bianche, Giro? I'm not going to talk of the Tour because the competition he faced was injuried competition, even if it was better than the competition he faced in the previous races.
There is 3/4 guys that win every race, especially Pogacar who won a lot this year, and then there is a bunch of farmers who always lose against those guys.
It's not about the difference between the good and the not so good. It's about the fact that many years ago many riders didn't approach everything in such a professional way as they do now. It's happened in all sports.If we go by that logic of "farmers" in Merckx era, then we can say the same about this era.
This era is basically 3/4 riders above everybody, and the rest is farmers.
What is the name of the guys Pogacar beat in strade bianche, Giro? I'm not going to talk of the Tour because the competition he faced was injuried competition, even if it was better than the competition he faced in the previous races.
There is 3/4 guys that win every race, especially Pogacar who won a lot this year, and then there is a bunch of farmers who always lose against those guys.
Ok, but if you have lack of professionalism on one hand and super teams on the other, both limiting the level of competition (though I still don’t agree about the latter) - what would you say was the sweetspot? Historically speaking, what was the most competitive era in cycling?Cycling didn't just randomly appear in the '90s. Through the post war period up to the '80 teams where not so important. Altough some really strong teams existed, like KAS or Van Looy's Faema, they never had the strongholds of todays team. Like almost 75% of this year world tour races (so far) have been won by 4 teams, and that's not inclunding Trek and Ineos. And not only they dominate the result sheet, they also dominate the race development.
Yeah, the teams are way more professional now, but it's a shame they all looked like amateurs this year against Emirates.It's not about the difference between the good and the not so good. It's about the fact that many years ago many riders didn't approach everything in such a professional way as they do now. It's happened in all sports.
I would say from the mid 1990 to OP, excluding the TdF. I have a friend who calls the doping of that period 'democratic'.Ok, but if you have lack of professionalism on one hand and super teams on the other, both limiting the level of competition (though I still don’t agree about the latter) - what would you say was the sweetspot? Historically speaking, what was the most competitive era in cycling?
It’s exactly like that in my opinion. When a sport is transitioning to more professional approach, there is a period where you have guys who have already committed entirely to sport while some of them still keep taking it easy. Take F1 for example. You had a period where some guys took things very seriously and had entire gym programme figured out already (Senna) while others still smoked cigarettes (Rosberg). That kind of environment is without a doubt less competitive than the one where everyone is at the gym 6 hours/day, caring about details like nutrition etc. Entire sport evolves and it’s taking more and more effort to succeed relatively to what it took years ago. It’s not that you can use the latest tools to achieve comparative advantage - you have to use them not to stay behind. Everything needs to fall into place, including having the right team.I would say from the mid 1990 to OP, excluding the TdF. I have a friend who calls the doping of that period 'democratic'.
Anyway i don't know why lack of professionalism (and i also have some grudges about using this word, like not having a power meter is not a lack commitent, it's short coming of pre solid state electronics) would limit the competition. It surely limit the average performance of the peloton, but it's not like some people where insanely more professional than others.
Over the 5 years Pogacar competed for the TdF GC, Visma was by far the stronger team than UAE on a cumulative basis (in 2023 UAE caught up and they were roughly on par the first time, in 2024 they obviously were the strongest although against a Visma B-team). In fact, Pogacar's first two wins were like racing for Total Energy or Cofidis. He literally had zero support.Yeah, the teams are way more professional now, but it's a shame they all looked like amateurs this year against Emirates.
Totally agree. Except I think you got the years mixed up? It was 2020 and 2021.Over the 5 years Pogacar competed for the TdF GC, Visma was by far the stronger team than UAE on a cumulative basis (in 2023 UAE caught up and they were roughly on par the first time, in 2024 they obviously were the strongest although against a Visma B-team). In fact, Pogacar's first two wins were like racing for Total Energy or Cofidis. He literally had zero support.
2019:
1. Pogacar
40. Polanc
72. De La Cruz
2020:
1. Pogacar
34. Majka
44. Formolo
I actually didn’t find him that impressive, Sunday will give us a better view on his form thoughGood show today. He seems on track to be WC.
Trade him to Movistar.Pogacar should demand UAE to dump him asap.
I agree that Sunday will be a better measure of form- the climb on the circuit today was relatively short- Sunday should reveal more one way or anotherI actually didn’t find him that impressive, Sunday will give us a better view on his form though
I don't generally disagree, but when Merckx rolled around many competition were verging on being 60 years old. The were already waves of ''professionalization'' before. If you look at some documentaries you can see that they were paying attention to thing like diet, rest and their bikes. Now, of course, i'm not denying progress, they surely had a more limited knowledge of phisiology than what we have today and more limited resources (i mean they stopped at bar to get water and soda bottles) but in general they were far from amateurs, that was more in the pre WW-I and maybe WW-II era. Cycling was seen as a profession and a good paying one to my knowledge.It’s exactly like that in my opinion. When a sport is transitioning to more professional approach, there is a period where you have guys who have already committed entirely to sport while some of them still keep taking it easy. Take F1 for example. You had a period where some guys took things very seriously and had entire gym programme figured out already (Senna) while others still smoked cigarettes (Rosberg). That kind of environment is without a doubt less competitive than the one where everyone is at the gym 6 hours/day, caring about details like nutrition etc. Entire sport evolves and it’s taking more and more effort to succeed relatively to what it took years ago. It’s not that you can use the latest tools to achieve comparative advantage - you have to use them not to stay behind. Everything needs to fall into place, including having the right team.
I think the sport has never been more competitive than it is now, certainly not in the Merckx era. I would never be as insulting to call those guys farmers, though…
Not bad. He seemed pleased. I think he didn't try a long range attack so he could save something for Sunday.Good show today. He seems on track to be WC.