I'm afraid he is.Not enough Pidcock.
Regarding Pogacar, I think he could add FW to his schedule. Nice warmup before the big prize.
I'm afraid he is.Not enough Pidcock.
I think you will find that there are plenty of people who think that Messi or Ronaldo is undoubtedly the greatest player of all time. Those are obviously not the Most balanced opinions and those may not be the greatest Football experts of all time, but I think still that those Fans are a plurality just like Pogačar Fans in cycling. I think this actually happens in almost every sport with the best athletes of their generation.I like Pogacar
But it seems only in cycling that there’s such recency bias and current rider worship from fans.
No one really puts down pele or Maradona in favour of Messi or Ronaldo in football, the debate tends to be more balanced.
Pele never even played outside of the Americas in his entire club career , but no one says he played in a farmers league.
Merckx dominated gts and monuments against great competition in both but he ‘competed against farmers’
It just annoys me as a fan of sport and of cycling.
They would have a good case certainly for Messi who has won everything.I think you will find that there are plenty of people who think that Messi or Ronaldo is undoubtedly the greatest player of all time. Those are obviously not the Most balanced opinions and those may not be the greatest Football experts of all time, but I think still that those Fans are a plurality just like Pogačar Fans in cycling. I think this actually happens in almost every sport with the best athletes of their generation.
I’m Axel MerckxTell me you are not Charlyghoul...
There will be always people like you, who will find some argument even for most obvious things. Messi was the GOAT even before he won WC with Argentina. I don't like Messi and i will always be Cristiano fan, but he was so much better than everybody else and everybody could see it. He won that WC with a great amount of luck (3 penalty series) so if one of his teammates would not score goal from penalty... he would not be the Goat? Soccer is so much more difficult right now since and doing this now (as Messi did) is just something else). The same goes for Pogacar, people saying if he doesn't win P-R he is not the GOAT, those people (like you) just don't want to see obvious things. So if Wout had mechanical on last cobble sector Pogacar would somehow be much better rider as he is now? He is riding P-R with 66kg, it is literally 8-14kg difference from other TOP 10 riders. That would be whole 2 categories in boxing right now. It is the most amazing person we have ever seen in cycling.They would have a good case certainly for Messi who has won everything.
Not as many were calling him the greatest ever
( better than Pelé or Maradona) in say 2011 or 2012 when Messi was at his peak, like Pogacar is now.
He had a lot more left to win, he still hadn’t won anything with Argentina, had only won half of his ballon d’ors, hadn’t played in different leagues.
Pogacar is like Messi of that time, he’s brilliant, he has the talent, but he probably still has big things to do to be the greatest.
Even Merckx didnt have such dedicated haters. The true sign of greatness
So you are 80 years old dude, who is using word "lol" ?lol. Merckx had so many dedicated haters he got punched while riding up the Puy de Dome.
The French HATED him until he lost.
And the theory had it that Merckx was convinced not to start the 1973 TDF because the public had had enough.
And there is a YouTube video somewhere at the start of the 1975 TDF where every member of the public responds to the reporter’s question saying they are so tired of Merckx “ras le bol de Merckx”.
Again this thread is being peppered by posters who know almost nothing about the era. I lived it. In Europe. Stop mouthing off on stuff you don’t know anything about.
So you are 80 years old dude, who is using word "lol" ?
Usually that’s were you end it with “gg 2ez get rkt”.Not sure your math(s) is that good, “dude”.
But lol.
The Spaniards were willing to beat him up. The French seethed....how dare that Belgian dominate our precious Grand Boucle'. You could sense that when Lemond beat up on Hinault except he had so little team support they had sympathy. Didn't every major rider get a fan-sponsored bath of mystery liquid at some point? Euro team riders didn't treat newcomers any better, either.lol. Merckx had so many dedicated haters he got punched while riding up the Puy de Dome.
The French HATED him until he lost.
And the theory had it that Merckx was convinced not to start the 1973 TDF because the public had had enough.
And there is a YouTube video somewhere at the start of the 1975 TDF where every member of the public responds to the reporter’s question saying they are so tired of Merckx “ras le bol de Merckx”.
Again this thread is being peppered by posters who know almost nothing about the era. I lived it. In Europe. Stop mouthing off on stuff you don’t know anything about.
You're using "dude". Spicoli wants his lingo back.So you are 80 years old dude, who is using word "lol" ?
Annoys you? Do we look like we care?I like Pogacar
But it seems only in cycling that there’s such recency bias and current rider worship from fans.
No one really puts down pele or Maradona in favour of Messi or Ronaldo in football, the debate tends to be more balanced.
Pele never even played outside of the Americas in his entire club career , but no one says he played in a farmers league.
Merckx dominated gts and monuments against great competition in both but he ‘competed against farmers’
It just annoys me as a fan of sport and of cycling.
That entirely depends on how if Merckx were riding today he would be on a modern bike, with modern performance science, nutrition, strategic planning, etc. If his numbers would be superior, his will to win the same, then perhaps he could beat the best today. Conversely, how would Tadej or Jonas be in the conditions of the late 60s-early-70s, racing on steel frames, 170 days a year, on poor nutrition, etc? Would they beat Merckx or De Vlaeminck? This is why any real comparison between eras is impossible. It's like the Messi-Pele/Maradona debate. The game of football was played so differently between their eras and it's the same in cycling. As for the competition., Merckx faced the best cyclists in the sport at the time, during an age when riding a bike to get around was commonplace, much more than today, in continental Europe. In Italy there was even a game of plastic balls with cyclists pictures on them, which could be traded much lake baseball cards at the time in the US. That sort of thing doesn't exist anymore, while fewer ride bikes to get around and so the popular level of the sport has diminished and with it the viable number of talented riders to fill the pro ranks. Today that is made up for by the more global arena from which the pro ranks fill their teams. But to say Merckx only competed against cyclists from three other nations is misleading. All we can say is that Pogacar races in conditions that maximize his sensational physiological parameters, allowing him to reach performance levels that rival any of those in the past, for which some consider him the goat. The incredible thing about Merckx, however, was that, despite sub-optimal scientific preparation and racing so much year in and year out during his career, he still managed to win just about all the major classics and GTs multiple times. Impressive.Annoys you? Do we look like we care?
Merckx would be a meh rider nowadays.
Not great to beat MDVP, not great to beat Tadej or Jonas.
A glorified WVA.
Nothing more, nothing less.
It is simple. Back in those days there was a way bigger bunch of potential winners that they never were discovered.That entirely depends on how if Merckx were riding today he would be on a modern bike, with modern performance science, nutrition, strategic planning, etc. If his numbers would be superior, his will to win the same, then perhaps he could beat the best today. Conversely, how would Tadej or Jonas be in the conditions of the late 60s-early-70s, racing on steel frames, 170 days a year, on poor nutrition, etc? Would they beat Merckx or De Vlaeminck? This is why any real comparison between eras is impossible. It's like the Messi-Pele/Maradona debate. The game of football was played so differently between their eras and it's the same in cycling. As for the competition., Merckx faced the best cyclists in the sport at the time, during an age when riding a bike to get around was comonplace, much more than today, in continental Europe. In Italy there was even a game of plastic balls with cyclists pictures on them, which could be traded much lake baseball cards at the time in the US. That sort of thing doesn't exist anymore, while fewer ride bikes to get around and so the popular level of the sport has diminished and with it the viable number of talented riders to fill the pro ranks. Today that is made up for by the more global arena from which the pro ranks fill their teams. But to say Merckx only competed against cyclists from three other nations is misleading. All we can say is that Pogacar races in conditions that maximize his sensational physiological parameters, allowing him to reach performance levels that rival any of those of the past, for which some consider him the goat. The incredible thing about Merckx, however, was that, despite sub-optimal scientific preparation and racing so much year in and year out during his career, he still managed to win just about all the major classics and GTs multiple times. Impressive.It is simple
idk if it's comparable. You only have one Pogi, Messi and Ronaldo were two going toe-to-toe for years and years, so more difficult to argue one was dominant on the level of Pogi.No one really puts down pele or Maradona in favour of Messi or Ronaldo in football, the debate tends to be more balanced.
